Message from @Dennafen

Discord ID: 462761663477841920


2018-06-30 23:23:16 UTC  

nah... parties are always pitching for donations...

2018-06-30 23:23:54 UTC  

That money is frequently going directly to the candidate, or to a PAC.

2018-06-30 23:24:15 UTC  

again not talking about money.

2018-06-30 23:24:34 UTC  

The money is the exchange for political favor.

2018-06-30 23:24:53 UTC  

Political donations should be 100% illegal

2018-06-30 23:25:07 UTC  

Entirely?

2018-06-30 23:25:12 UTC  

No they're not thinking for themselves, they allowing other corporate interests to simply supply them with their opinions.

2018-06-30 23:25:12 UTC  

btw.. does US reward the party from election turnout....

2018-06-30 23:25:15 UTC  

Yes entirely

2018-06-30 23:26:03 UTC  

I guess I don't follow, Dennafen. Why would that be the case?

2018-06-30 23:26:28 UTC  

What reason does the politician have to follow a corporation's perception of things rather than their own?

2018-06-30 23:26:57 UTC  

The only corporations that I can see that would have influence to that degree without question would be the media corporations.

2018-06-30 23:27:04 UTC  

Less thinking and more money involved

2018-06-30 23:27:06 UTC  

And that's simply due to dependence.

2018-06-30 23:27:19 UTC  

That's what I'm trying to get across, Falko.

2018-06-30 23:27:38 UTC  

It's a financial exchange.

2018-06-30 23:27:52 UTC  

I was never a big fan of Rick Perry, but I hated him all the more when I traced the money to the law.

2018-06-30 23:28:42 UTC  

He made a relatively new vaccine mandatory in Texas to middle school teenagers. Turns out, he'd taken money from the pharmaceutical company behind it.

2018-06-30 23:28:46 UTC  

Okay when the Cato institute comes up with a policy idea, that should be advice for a reprehensive, but instead they have fully written bills that are given to representatives and then they put up for vote with little or no change.

2018-06-30 23:29:16 UTC  

This isn't an attack on the Cato institute just one I thought of off the top of my head.

2018-06-30 23:29:38 UTC  

Most if not all special interest groups do this same thing.

2018-06-30 23:30:00 UTC  

Which should also be illegal

2018-06-30 23:30:05 UTC  

Most laws that are presented are like this as well.

2018-06-30 23:30:31 UTC  

I can agree with that one @I AM ERROR

2018-06-30 23:30:41 UTC  

relevant, I think.

2018-06-30 23:30:49 UTC  

lol

2018-06-30 23:31:09 UTC  

Nacy Pelosi is a joke.

2018-06-30 23:32:19 UTC  

I tend to agree with Falko, for the most part

2018-06-30 23:33:09 UTC  

As journalism was infiltrated, civil society organisations were too .... legislatives listen to their proposals

2018-06-30 23:33:22 UTC  

I tend to agree with myself, but I'm skeptical even then.

2018-06-30 23:33:26 UTC  

but it's hard to comprehend a legal structure that would make that enforceable in a realistic way.

2018-06-30 23:33:41 UTC  

Unless I'm drunk, then I REALLY agree with myself.

2018-06-30 23:35:27 UTC  

In my mind: fund parties with tax money based on voting results and voter turnout, all policy proposals must be transparent to the average voters in what they do, why they do it and who proposed it

2018-06-30 23:35:45 UTC  

Already a problem with that.

2018-06-30 23:35:54 UTC  

I know

2018-06-30 23:36:06 UTC  

Tax dollars going directly to political parties.

2018-06-30 23:36:12 UTC  

That cements the current political structure.

2018-06-30 23:36:21 UTC  

We've had political parties die and be replaced in the past

2018-06-30 23:36:24 UTC  

nobody runs as a whig anymore.

2018-06-30 23:36:57 UTC  

If you have to get elected to get funding, and you have to get funding to get publicity...