Message from @Dennafen

Discord ID: 462760547746578435


2018-06-30 23:19:27 UTC  

There are more and more libertarian-minded people moving in.

2018-06-30 23:19:53 UTC  

Technically, the NGO would save more lives by working with smugglers because there would be no chance of missing a boat, and save even more lives again by actually paying the smugglers because the people most at risk of death can't afford to pay.

It's pretty clear the NGO should completely fund smugglers and transport people shore to shore.
How can't people see that?

2018-06-30 23:20:15 UTC  

Yeah, and the Democrats and Republicans are both just mouth pieces for different corporate overlords.

2018-06-30 23:20:25 UTC  

At the moment.

2018-06-30 23:20:34 UTC  

I'm not certain that's the truth.

2018-06-30 23:20:37 UTC  

For either side.

2018-06-30 23:21:18 UTC  

Maybe not for local governments, but for the federal government it does feel that way.

2018-06-30 23:21:20 UTC  

I don't think it's the parties that get bought out, but the politicians.

2018-06-30 23:21:40 UTC  

It's the equivalent of saying Youtube is a mouthpiece for Dollar Shave Club.

2018-06-30 23:21:58 UTC  

except instead of spicy videos, the people being bought are making law.

2018-06-30 23:22:20 UTC  

I see what you mean, but it's not the same thing.

2018-06-30 23:22:25 UTC  

Its more like saying youtube is a mouthpiece of google 😁

2018-06-30 23:22:33 UTC  

No, that would be more accurate.

2018-06-30 23:23:10 UTC  

When you have politicians on both sides submitting laws from special interests groups with little or no changes that what I mean by being mouth piece for corporate interests.

2018-06-30 23:23:16 UTC  

nah... parties are always pitching for donations...

2018-06-30 23:23:54 UTC  

That money is frequently going directly to the candidate, or to a PAC.

2018-06-30 23:24:15 UTC  

again not talking about money.

2018-06-30 23:24:34 UTC  

The money is the exchange for political favor.

2018-06-30 23:24:53 UTC  

Political donations should be 100% illegal

2018-06-30 23:25:07 UTC  

Entirely?

2018-06-30 23:25:12 UTC  

No they're not thinking for themselves, they allowing other corporate interests to simply supply them with their opinions.

2018-06-30 23:25:12 UTC  

btw.. does US reward the party from election turnout....

2018-06-30 23:25:15 UTC  

Yes entirely

2018-06-30 23:26:03 UTC  

I guess I don't follow, Dennafen. Why would that be the case?

2018-06-30 23:26:28 UTC  

What reason does the politician have to follow a corporation's perception of things rather than their own?

2018-06-30 23:26:57 UTC  

The only corporations that I can see that would have influence to that degree without question would be the media corporations.

2018-06-30 23:27:04 UTC  

Less thinking and more money involved

2018-06-30 23:27:06 UTC  

And that's simply due to dependence.

2018-06-30 23:27:19 UTC  

That's what I'm trying to get across, Falko.

2018-06-30 23:27:38 UTC  

It's a financial exchange.

2018-06-30 23:27:52 UTC  

I was never a big fan of Rick Perry, but I hated him all the more when I traced the money to the law.

2018-06-30 23:28:42 UTC  

He made a relatively new vaccine mandatory in Texas to middle school teenagers. Turns out, he'd taken money from the pharmaceutical company behind it.

2018-06-30 23:28:46 UTC  

Okay when the Cato institute comes up with a policy idea, that should be advice for a reprehensive, but instead they have fully written bills that are given to representatives and then they put up for vote with little or no change.

2018-06-30 23:29:16 UTC  

This isn't an attack on the Cato institute just one I thought of off the top of my head.

2018-06-30 23:29:38 UTC  

Most if not all special interest groups do this same thing.

2018-06-30 23:30:00 UTC  

Which should also be illegal

2018-06-30 23:30:05 UTC  

Most laws that are presented are like this as well.

2018-06-30 23:30:31 UTC  

I can agree with that one @I AM ERROR

2018-06-30 23:30:41 UTC  

relevant, I think.

2018-06-30 23:30:49 UTC  

lol