Message from @Dr.Wol

Discord ID: 463758094288289822


2018-07-03 15:59:04 UTC  

I just finished watching it in pieces here. Good interview.

2018-07-03 16:13:45 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/398858182455459853/463739134863736842/image.png

2018-07-03 16:13:59 UTC  

Because liberals get the bullet too

2018-07-03 16:16:27 UTC  

The FBI is literally investigating every imagined conspiracy theory the lefty media can invent.

2018-07-03 16:17:38 UTC  

@RanStairs who are those people?

2018-07-03 16:26:03 UTC  

its cuz they're too far with the lie, they have to stick with it now and desperately try to find ANYTHING to dent Trump,
Not realising (or perhaps willfully ignoring) the fact that with every grasp, they solidify his core base, and only push the center further away because they'll get tired of this endless nothingness

2018-07-03 16:26:51 UTC  

Trump knows this i think tahts why he's letting them, because when the end of the investigation comes, he'll bring the hammer down on them for wasting all this time. And with every grasp the left media made, the hammer will increase in size

2018-07-03 16:27:23 UTC  

not just time, money too

2018-07-03 16:27:48 UTC  

@ikillomega share it. we're tryna get the story out.

2018-07-03 16:30:10 UTC  

whats this MattesFile?

2018-07-03 16:46:40 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/398858182455459853/463747419117584384/image.png

2018-07-03 16:46:42 UTC  

What do you guys think about this plea deal, and the “ conspiracy theories “
http://archive.today/700xn

2018-07-03 17:12:41 UTC  

he pled guilty,

conspiracy theories are in the eye of the beholder

2018-07-03 17:13:27 UTC  

Molymeme did a completely exhaustive examination of all the sketchy crap that family was involved in. I doubt it had anything to do with the 2016 election.

2018-07-03 17:13:48 UTC  

Just regular corruption.

2018-07-03 17:14:26 UTC  

Old boomer politicians who don't understand tech paying a slimey used car salesman to do their network admin work and getting taken to the cleaners.

2018-07-03 17:14:38 UTC  

Harvard Business Review via Twitter: Breakthrough research shows that diverse teams make better investments. https://hbr.org/2018/07/the-other-diversity-dividend (Archive: http://archive.fo/cqQIj )

2018-07-03 17:15:50 UTC  

I think Marvel wants a word with the writers

2018-07-03 17:19:57 UTC  

@Deleted User Some antifags

2018-07-03 17:28:23 UTC  

From what i gather from that article, their biggest claim to "diversity works" is that since the 50's, Americas Economy went up, and this coincided with the fact more non-whites and wamen joined the workforce.

Bigger workforce increases economic growth, who knew?

2018-07-03 17:29:05 UTC  

and in the end it starts promoting gender bias training etc

2018-07-03 17:41:55 UTC  

few people will tell you this, but financial performance goes up when the number of employees you have increases faster than their labor appreciation relitive to consumption of production

2018-07-03 17:42:59 UTC  

I find it amusing that the local grocery co-op, a cooperative, put in massive self serve checkouts and got rid of a pile of staff. Co-op 😮

2018-07-03 17:47:07 UTC  

i'm pretty sure this article actually supported a meritocracy

2018-07-03 17:47:14 UTC  

"To accomplish that, companies need not explicitly favor a particular race or gender when hiring. Sometimes simple adjustments in the selection process can increase diversity. In one study led by the behavioral economist Iris Bohnet, of Harvard Kennedy School, students were assigned the role of an employer asked to select an employee who would do well on a future math or verbal task. Even though gender was not predictive of performance, “employers” evaluating individual candidates were likely to be swayed by stereotypes, exhibiting a preference for women on verbal tasks and men on math tasks. But when they assessed two candidates side by side, gender suddenly became irrelevant. Evaluators instead focused on past performance—an actual indicator of future success."

2018-07-03 17:57:45 UTC  

that snipped would imply that diversity is actually irrelevant, and as its put itself, from only 1 study

2018-07-03 17:58:13 UTC  

exactly

2018-07-03 17:58:36 UTC  

hence supporting meritocracy

2018-07-03 17:58:36 UTC  

so that would disprove the claim that diversity is beneficial, which is the headline

2018-07-03 17:58:56 UTC  

well, in an earlier part in that article it also "assumed" all skills

2018-07-03 17:59:10 UTC  

are equal

2018-07-03 17:59:31 UTC  

its trying to spin things

2018-07-03 18:00:05 UTC  

saying "look, when you are actually basing things on merit, you will get a diverse staff"

2018-07-03 18:00:42 UTC  

so then its not diversity that is beneficial, but meritocracy

2018-07-03 18:01:10 UTC  

but you see, you are looking for a cause, not an effect. logic doesn't apply here, only bias

2018-07-03 18:01:40 UTC  

nah im looking on what the article claims, and if it supports it, which it doesnt, it contradicts itself

2018-07-03 18:01:46 UTC  

(ironic, given that the article states people get angry when confronted with their own bias... maybe explains the anger of the left?)

2018-07-03 18:01:54 UTC  

oh, it contradicts itself

2018-07-03 18:01:59 UTC  

its leftist in nature

2018-07-03 18:02:04 UTC  

by default it would