Message from @Aperture Tech

Discord ID: 464984563354042378


2018-07-07 02:35:58 UTC  

fair obviously

2018-07-07 02:36:07 UTC  

Would a system like the giver be put in place

2018-07-07 02:36:25 UTC  

You mentor and learn then take the next spot

2018-07-07 02:36:48 UTC  

most positions terms would jsut last the length of their position in their own States goverment

2018-07-07 02:36:57 UTC  

Or just like what we have now where anyone can go to school and grant an education that leads to you going forth with the position of government

2018-07-07 02:37:11 UTC  

but those not attached to the home government their would be a system of term limits in place

2018-07-07 02:37:22 UTC  

But

2018-07-07 02:37:31 UTC  

elected preferrably

2018-07-07 02:38:18 UTC  

Want to give the people as much power as possible, although a kinda of electoral college might be necessary

2018-07-07 02:38:23 UTC  

What if a subsection of member declared that they want an official to stay past term

2018-07-07 02:38:57 UTC  

I.e Democratic means to dictatorship

2018-07-07 02:39:38 UTC  

As in they already have a postion in the home state or only a position in the confederation?

2018-07-07 02:40:07 UTC  

Let's go with home state but with that in home state it could lead to confederation

2018-07-07 02:40:19 UTC  

tbh i havent thought as far into these aspects lol

2018-07-07 02:41:24 UTC  

A very well written constitution should be able to keep subsections of parties from illegitimate power,
The wording however..
Very interesting thoughts you guys have

2018-07-07 02:41:46 UTC  

If the home state has a change of governmental system then likely negotiations would have to start with the other members to determine their ability to stay on or have to appoint someone

2018-07-07 02:41:52 UTC  

hard to say there

2018-07-07 02:42:15 UTC  

but yea it could potentially be prevented if the constitution is written well enough lol

2018-07-07 02:42:33 UTC  

thanks Rickard

2018-07-07 02:42:33 UTC  

Ah but

2018-07-07 02:42:38 UTC  

BUT GOOD SIR

2018-07-07 02:42:42 UTC  

lol

2018-07-07 02:43:02 UTC  

although again they COULD also be kicked out

2018-07-07 02:43:13 UTC  

What if members vote to change this constitution

2018-07-07 02:43:18 UTC  

oooh!

2018-07-07 02:43:33 UTC  

And thank you rickard!

2018-07-07 02:43:41 UTC  

ideally though only Democracies would be members with very few exceptions like the UK

2018-07-07 02:44:21 UTC  

since they are technically in-between a Parliamentary Democracy and a Constitutional Monarchy

2018-07-07 02:44:40 UTC  

The Prime Minister would be the Confederations rep

2018-07-07 02:44:55 UTC  

Monarch would still largely do nothing as it does irl lol

2018-07-07 02:44:58 UTC  

Would it be one person

2018-07-07 02:45:01 UTC  

Or a collective

2018-07-07 02:45:17 UTC  

Might use royals for diplomacy though

2018-07-07 02:46:34 UTC  

Each member would have a Main rep, that being their executive leader. then theyd have essentially whatever their vice is if they have one and if not then the person would be elected by the individual state for that specific position

2018-07-07 02:47:02 UTC  

at least thats my vague idea of it lol

2018-07-07 02:47:09 UTC  

Also

2018-07-07 02:47:21 UTC  

i must disagree on the royals part.
I do support the idea of 'non' political diplomats that work for nothing but the best of relations with other entities.
Power should be earned, not inherited

2018-07-07 02:47:37 UTC  

I agree with you on this but for all of this to work we have to implement a all must vote law

2018-07-07 02:47:38 UTC  

true

2018-07-07 02:47:45 UTC  

It is mandatory for everyone to vote

2018-07-07 02:48:05 UTC  

i can see that