basically instead of two tables at the poll during the primaries youd have 3

the only reason RNC and DNC exist is to narrow down candidates

through the primary

but the people still elect the candidate

then the Super Delegates are SUPPOSED to function similarly to the Electoral College and vote with the constituents iirc

Yeah... The EU is doing alot it shouldn't.
I get the narrowing down principle, it makes sense for a party to do so.
But as you point out, at least one more option would probably do alot of good.
The super delegate part though, very strange!

and if it HAD to be between two parties then we would have to have an additional process after the primary to narrow things further

Super Delegates can be bought and honestly i think that they should be nonpartisan as a result

Man, if it had to be between two parties the corruption potential would be hughe

because they already have party biases

thats the problem we are dealing with

ofc they have. There should be no acctual delegates, only the result of the voting

DNC rigged the presidential primaries to ensure Hilarys win

yea ideally

i heard about that

very sad

id maintain the electoral college in regards to the over pres election though

popular vote aint always the smartest lol nor are electors at times but idk its a insurance thing if anything

like before typically electors just vote with the state

It may very well be an insuranse thing, but also a weak point

I remember hearing about that and the fact that bernie pulled a coward move and played for Hillary really showed me a lot

and since electors change based on population the way you campaign changes

Bernie did essentially cuck himself

Should I start another BLM page? The official one was some Australian guy having a laugh. And I'm an Australian guy that wants a laugh.. I could make them all do the Boiling water challenge and become cannibals or some shit

Very complicated system for someone not as read in to it as me 😛

tbh i dont know as much as i might be implying, especially about the Electoral College

Probably more than me anyhow!

thats why idk how to argue or or against it when it comes up

fair lol

https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/about.html

oh boy, here comes the facts!

"Each candidate running for President in your state has his or her own group of electors. The electors are generally chosen by the candidate’s political party, but state laws vary on how the electors are selected and what their responsibilities are. Read more about the qualifications of the Electors and restrictions on who the Electors may vote for."

lol

jeez

id get rid of party selected ones

but yea it leaves it up to the states

so California might have different rules from say Texas

btw something those two states have in common. They both like talking big, and about succession

aaaaaaaand they never do it, in part cause its illegal to leave the Union

Is it really illegal??

"The Constitution does not directly mention secession. ... The Supreme Court has consistently interpreted the Constitution to be an "indestructible" union. There is no legal basis a state can point to for unilaterally seceding. Many scholars hold that the Confederate secession was blatantly illegal."