right, right thats the whole idea. but theory and observation dont always agree w/ each other

and then you have tons of auto-immune diseases cases erupting where the immune system thinks the very organs/tissue of the PERSON is a "threat"

As for all the chemicals added to vaccines. Not too sure, could just bbe really modern failsafes. The original vaccines were just pus from the sores of infected people.

all im saying is.... this is an pro-informed-consent.... message

Not saying tis wrong, being misinformed is wrong. But not my fault, you got me thinking why some of those chemicals are there.

Now Im really curious what they used for.

ya, did you see the article i posted earlier about the CDC published ingredients?

Reminds me of that ciggarettes have over 1000+ chemicals

And they list down all the uses of it.

I dont smoke, but I reckon that if you search hard enough, you can find something innoculous that is used to produce one of the most unhealthiest things out there.

Some are added to stabilise the the vaccine solution, some is to prevent coagulation of the ingredients inside

Makes sense, pus hardens.

Harder for it to spread in the blood stream

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-06-cdc-document-bombshell-reveals-list-of-all-vaccine-excipients-including-african-green-monkey-kidney-cells-and-fibroblast-cells-from-aborted-human-fetuses-see-the-complete-list.html

But I think they should list the ingredients and uses in that vaccine so that we can be more inform about it

Yeah, its a mix of issues here.

One, slightly informed people can be more harmful than uninformed people

Informed enough to know that mercury is in it, but not enough to know that its in there as part of a compound and is harmless in that state,

True

cant imagine anyone in their right mind to read that LONG list of ingredients and be like.... "YEP, THAT SOUNDS GOOD!"

But we pretty much turn a blind eye to almost every other things like shampoo, soap, etc

Or even the processed food we eat

I mean it makes sense, but that falls back to my statement

Half informed is worse than uninformed.

thats not as bad as injecting them directly in you... which bypasses most of the body's protective barriors that help to filter and mitigate extreme complications and reactions

And its hella hard to make sure someone is "fully informed"

And people should try harder, keeping stuff like that hidden will only arouse suspicioun

doesnt matter anyways... no means no .... the obligation is not on us to prove that we are "fully informed"

Even then, people should look at the results anyway.

Having the information available is more important, because you can't really change the lazy people

If they cant understand the chems in vaccines, they should understand the results of the vaccines.

of course, they should be encouraged to read the insert label and see all the side effects admitted to and disclaimed straight out of the horses mouth

I am sure that its a thing where the drugs advertised in the US will say helps with x and then list down dozens of potential side effects,

my position is basic.... i am pro-consumer-choice

not "anti-vaxx"

Though I think showing the ingredients alone isnt enough

Anti vac is quite ridiculous tho

I was thinking, look what we achieved, well, this is what we needed.

i am for CLEAN and thoroughly third party safety tested vaccines and stuff after all w/o all the added toxic garbage perservatives and other adjuvents

yeah, you still would not be fully informed just by scanning over the list of ingrediets without a thoroough understanding about each and every one of them.... its just not worth the risk

net overall risk over benefit for much too high of risk