Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 465889518437007360
well i can't argue with that 😛
i think were actually having an issue where i have 2 definitions of politics
so i think i should appoligize
I think once you hold some influence in changing people's mind in politics, you are pretty much political
when im talking about sargon being in politics i mean big P Politics rather than small p politics
same, the moment you partake, you influence, hence you are taking part in politics
Thus you are being political
i think im being semantic
I think I get what you mean
But we don't know the reason for them in joining UKIP
but theres a notion of being IN politics while also theres a notion of being political outside of politics, sargon has actually been political practicly ever since he made a youtube
we are arguing over semantics i think
You just don't consider Sargon to be active in the realm of real life politics
And even though they might not get a position in the government and stuff, he could still be a grassroot for the party
he's not running for office etc, and trying to change the normie world physically
hes been a pundit for his own political ideology ever since gamer gate however in more recent times hes flirted with closer with the actual political system of his country though never actually commited to it. even him joining ukip wasent really a big deal, you have to ask yourself, how many people do you watch on youtube who are registered voters? because thats really all he became no more no less
true, in that regard he isn't partaking in politics
he pundit for brexit, pundit for theresa may now hes punditing for ukip with the added context hes a registered voter, hes not simply saying what he is doing now but also saying what he thinks other people should do but at the same time hes still not a foci of the responcibility of governence of the people yet to any degree
true, but he's famous so his activities do inspire people to take action
sure but it would be even more inspiring if he was a leader more than a cheer leader
well, with his occasional stage shows, and speeches he does a bit of that.
But the rest of the time, yes he's waiving his kekistani pompoms at western values
and thats sort of my arguement that hes very good at avoiding that commitment
cuz he doesn't want to do them 😄
ofcourse, he wants other people to do it for him but he creates an illusion to a lot of people that what he does is very important and very influincing, but in truth no ones lives are directly effected by his ability to make critical choices
When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all 😉
I don't think sargon is that big of a name to influence change on a large scale
back to the whole uk thing, if anyone is interested, i think as it is right now its very important to look at what labour does in the future because i dont really have any idea how the torys could posibly hold themselves together without support
labour is conservatives right?
they might all be leftists compared to the US
torys are conseritives
torys vs labour is like democrats vs progressives here in the states
neolibs vs socialists
labor is socialists, Jeremy Corbin thinks Cuba is utopia
lol
i think that labour is crazy but at this point maybe an insane person is better than an evil person
if you can strip away a lot of the antinativist shit from labour that would certainly help too
How insane?
i havent really thought about labour in a while i really remember a lot of batshit stuff from the last election though, just not the details
is cuba no longer under a dictatorship?
oh
once again, men are better than women in everything, apparently