Lol @ the article they linked about the "intellectual dark web" too

"Here are some things that you will hear when you sit down to dinner with the vanguard of the Intellectual Dark Web: There are fundamental biological differences between men and women."

what r penes an vagine

hormone socal consdruc

I... think it's meant to be supportive of the IDW? But I'm not sure

Oh god, president German inner security Organisation (Verfassungsschutz) (IIRC Equivalent to your NSA), gets a new job.
For stating facts and speaking truth -> there was no hunt on Migrants.

new job?

Like what he was fired?

Yes, you can say that he was fired

To the web above. No Lauren Southern? Pshht

Lauren is right next to Stefan

Styx is a bit too unpresent

looks like a web of diversity to me

No Idea what they represent. BUt looks weird.

That tweet is from a parody account.

the Ford one?

yep

im suprized not to see philip defranco or jontron. guardian didint really do their research

Hmm you are right. Scott Adams needs to do more colabs tho

Pewds isn't on there?

@Arch-Fiend lol and @Timcast is in the center of that network <:TimThink:482277772497125378> 👌

"rightwing influencer Stefan Molyneux, who openly promotes scientific racism"

Scientific racism?

Racism backed by science. Well at least they are openly anti-science.

" If a user is caught sending abusive Super Chats, the revenue received will be donated to charity instead of being split between YouTube and the channel’s creator"

So they punish the creator for what the users are saying.... So basically they steal the superchats from creators who could be being harassed?

That's hilarious

wasn't guardian one of the biggest news sites pro-snowden when he leaked the documents ? now, they're pro-censorship... what a turn

Rules for thee, not for me

where did you see that @Grenade123 is that part of the new EU laws?

Seriously?

Oh, no

It's in the article up there

From the guardian

oh gotcha, my bad, i didnt read up

ill stfu and go back to my corner lol

"“YouTube is an open platform where anyone can choose to post videos to a global audience, subject to our community guidelines, which we enforce rigorously,” said a YouTube spokeswoman.

The company has tightened the rules for which channels have access to monetisation features and deployed machine learning technology to identify hate speech in comment features, the spokeswoman added. If a user is caught sending abusive Super Chats, the revenue received will be donated to charity instead of being split between YouTube and the channel’s creator."

There has to be a potential lawsuit there somehow. It's steal money from the commentor and creator

ya that is pretty messed up

i have to agree, if i donate money to one person

and another group comes along and takes it

thats thievery of the highest order

I know they can claim it's in the TOS, but o don't think this is enforceable.