Yes, we can agree on that.

with 80% of the country (how do we not have this yet?)

because the people who would vote that in are career politicians?

https://twitter.com/amnestyusa/status/1044275471809216513

So sexual assault of a minor wasn't enough, rape wasn't enough, gang rape wasn't enough, gotta go straight to *genocide*.

@Grenade123 Constitutional Convention yo

Hold on

How is THAT not outside intervention in our election process?

Brett Kavanaugh ethnically cleansed me once. (I got better)

a NGO

calling for us to Halt our processes

I'm really, really interested as to what the democrats are planning. They're willing to burn so many resources to keep this guy off the bench that it has to be HUGE.

I think the implication was that he was involved in torture, not genocide

(I was being facetious)

Sure, I just wanted to make sure we were on the correct ridiculous accusation page

Atkins - That is why if I were President Trump, I would have went with my second pick for this one let them freak out and then after they push all their political capital I would put up my real pick.

Nope. Never give in to this bullshit.

Oh no, not give in

Never set the precedent that a man is guilty until proven innocent.

Have some one I don't mind if I win with..but don't mind if he goes down in flames

I wouldnt advocate this 4d chess nonsense. Just push through

^

We should halt any future funding to Amnesty International unless and until any information relevant to their possible involvement in human rights violations.

how about

we just stop at

"We should halt any future funding to Amnesty International"

if they do a good job they can get money through donations, if not..then to bad?

I thought the idea of threatening a second nomination was crazy, but now I think about it, it's the kind of hardball the Dems would try. Maybe it could work. Amy seems like a good threat. She actually would repeal Roe.

I mean, if it were me..I would have my next nominee lined up and as soon as the vote is finished throw it out there.

and as that crap show is going, start working on my third, and keep doing it till Sparticus has a Heart Attackicus

I wouldn't just throw it out. But I would issue a credible threat.

Oh I would, and after the third or fourth..I would like Pick Ted Cruz, just to make their head explode.

So a sexy halloween costume company had a sexy Handmaid's Tale costume that people got offended about, and they took it down and apologized. Now they're under fire for having sexy native American costumes.
http://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/2018/09/24/yandys-sexy-native-american-costume-sparks-twitter-backlash-youre-filth.html

It's pretty ironic that people in favor of the message of Handmaid's Tale would attack them for not showing enough modesty in their dress.

the costume debate begins again lol

Clearly they feel allowing women to dress a certain way is sexist :^)

expecting ideological consistency from regressives are we?

They're radical+intersectional feminists, so yes they view allowing women to dress as a sexy native is wrong because it enforces the patriarchy through objectification, and harms minority women who are more vulnerable than white women.
It's liberal feminism that views empowering women by allowing them to make their own choices as a good. Or as they like to call it 'white feminism'.

but thaaaaaaz racisssss

at least they are finally starting to admit that they just hate white people

literally playing into the alt-rights hands imo