Message from @aukkras
Discord ID: 495311073872838696
Jeb "please clap" Bush lul
And soon the harassment will start for them too. This is getting ridiculous and we're rapidly approaching something very, very bad.
the word "ridiculous" is starting to lose meaning, I've been using it so much
I've gone to using Redonkulous, which I stole from Total Drama _______
By any means. I expect we will get a repeat of the Ted Cruz situation in front of Lindsey Graham's house soon. That's not good. This personal harassment and protest is going to end badly
Oh you know how this ends?
A female republican Raped at a Gas Station.
That was a good show
Total Drama? Yeah
Didnt see the world tour though
there is a new season coming eventually..or at least coming on Netflix
It's scary that retributive rape for social justice might actually be plausible.
People on twitter salty about Kavanaugh are already heading in that direction
Oh I am not even talking about "for social justice" I am just thinking Mob Mentality, how do you think "Mobbing them at the gas station" like Finestien suggested ends ?
How long until one of these "flash mobs" at a restaurant go on until some guy decides to follow behind a female member of the party and just says "fuck it she is a Nazi she deserves it."
https://www.reddit.com/r/censorship/comments/9j7yt5/the_act_which_will_censor_americans_internet_to/ Interesting thread about internet censorship coming to US @Timcast
Claire Lehman is on the Rubin Report. That's one I need to watch and not simply listen to 😍
@aukkras now that's scary. Is there a good, credible write up beyond a reddit post?
I should say, a sizeable number of people here do not like Reddit and will refuse to use it.
I think EFF is credible source. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/state-lawmakers-want-block-pornography-expense-your-free-speech-privacy-and-hard - this is what he linked
True, but it's also an activist organization.
You want something that looks more neutral if possible.
Even if it isn't.
no that shit needs to be highlighted
that sounds like one of the scummiest two faced bills i've read in awhile
Agreed.
It also seems like the kind of thing that would be abused.
Google already implements all sorts of filters they don't tell you about, but it would say you won't have an alternative should the need arise.
I'm rather agnostic but the writing on the bills website
*Sex” is good.* ***God made it.*** *But “healthy sex” is all about context.*
how about fuck the fuck off
"God made sex" is a homophobic stance
This reminds me of a TradCath argument against the PUA lifestyle I heard recently, that it and hypergamy make sex a product to be consumed, and governments want consumers because they're easier to control. Which goes well with the language here ``` “Sex” is good. God made it. But “healthy sex” is all about context. Sex is powerful,and a government that cares about its people will pass laws to better enable and encourage its citizens to have sex in settings that accord with “the truth about our nature” and “the truth about the way things are.”```
A government isn't supposed to care about it's people.
Stop personifying government, people.
As much as I'm for the message, it's not government's message to send!
You cannot fix culture with law!
Do you want fascism? Because that's how you get fascism.
Some people do want fascism
Even if they say they're anti-fascism