XD

Yes, the 10th ammendment, that gives us all the right to go back to Peleolitich caveman times. 👍

we have a Constitution? Since when?

If you ever want to see how trucks can be driven through loopholes, just watch the traffic flying past the interstate commerce clause

Wait, so people haven't realized it's a false flag?

oh well

realized? you mean are pushing its not

What's a false flag this time?

No evidence of such

The revolutionary war was a British false flag, we’re still British colonies

So back to feminism and meritocracy.

Had to go old skool on that one. 😛

So we agree women should be able to vote and attend public school. Do we agree that they should have equal access to university programs and the professions?

Equal access, yes. Not equal representation.

All these things have been flaming feminist causes within the past 100 years

@DrYuriMom i'm afraid the people of our fair country don't understand the importance of freedom of association and why giving power to the states helps protect that freedom and allows everyone to get along better. They would instead rather be ignorant and let nefarious of just straight up idiotic people erode that right and cement authoritarian power in the federal government.

I never said equal representation. I said equal access.

Modern feminisms are demanding equal representation. That's where my complaint of them stems from, and why I say modern feminists are in contradiction to meritocracy.

Personally, I think applications should be given numbers and cleansed of race and sex identifiers. Then decisions get made by committees that are blinded to that data.

they tried that, didn't it end up being sexist AND racist

There are feminists and there are feminists, sir

"sexist" and "racist"

just like Amazons bot learned "female" was somehow "bad" for the job

@Grenade123 and @DrYuriMom - Yes they did try that. They went a step beyond, they tried it with a computer that specifically was not told the sex or race of any applicants. The amazon bots example was only one of the more recent/more heavily publicized times that this occured.

No surprise I'm a woman. I'm college educated and a professional with board certification and a license to practice in several states. I'm kinda attached to my achievements but they were all based on merit. My tests were the same as the boys and I rocked them.

I'm glad I had the opportunity to achieve this

100 years ago, I might not have

So to the feminists of days past, I raise a glass

I served

Rightly so. I'm glad to have you here on their behalf. But don't compare those feminists to modern feminists.

who is that feminist that used to pal around with Milo from time to time

50 years ago, I would not have been able to except as a nurse in some sidelines fakeshit service

Yea, old feminism is alright, neo-feminism is pretty shit

that is the kind of feminist who was helpful

Same thing with the progressive era, as a whole.

Tbh women of today also don't get that opportunity
>hiring quotas
>wahmen specific post secondary shit despite them being a majority
>modern schooling geared towards traits found more often in women than in men
They get to the end, but their accomplishments are undermined by the helping hands

I don't know how anyone can stand the condescension

@DrYuriMom I think we're all in agreement here.
Original feminists, original anti-racists, all of the greats. We fully support. Dr. King was an amazing man, and hats off to him.
But just take one look at modern feminists and things like BLM, and you tell me with a straight face that those great people of the past wouldn't look on with disgust at what their actions have been perverted into in modern society.

Just remember, women were derided for seeking equal rights throughout history

The bullshit women had to endure in the military is still very fresh

I've seen leftist of today basically calling MLK an idealist fool