the fact someone had to invent the word Cis is... a fucking disgrace to all of humanity.

Thats*

they all have slightly different means

Weak

Beta=weak

Wea>k on ur keyboard why is it that hard to type weak

soyboy implies they are weak because of what they eat, beta implies weak because of lack of testosterone, and cuck is weak in terms of skill and confidence, so much so their partner needs someone else to satisfy them

beta can also mean lack of fighting ability

Lol thats typically subjective and can occur with alpha type mammals.

and in the animal kindgom, betas usually need to resort to rape in order to procreate

hence the male feminist ally being a rapist trope

There's more to it than that.
Originally the idea was applied to animal packs.
The Alpha Wolf being the leader, and the Betas being the others that follow.
In humans and our modern society, it's been twisted slightly, but the idea of an Alpha still exists (see Trump), where the idea of a Beta has become... well, a hyper-extreme of the concept. Human Betas are so utterly BETA in that regard, that if animals understood, they'd commit suicide to be considered a beta on the same tier.

See example: Male Feminists are Betas.

its just nature after all

Alphas are the strongest and best, Betas are doomed to second place, they can't compete against Alphas.

Eh its a stretch with words nowadays. I could call someone an omega and that would be last guy.

So are they worse than betas or better than alphas

the terms beta and alpha stem from what we observed in pack animals

but Grenade123's description of the other terms is largely right.
Soyboy- Implied to only eat soy and has a low testosterone level. Often seen as a reason they're all betas.
Cuck- Worthless at everything they do, so bad at sex that they need someone else to come fuck their partner to satisfy them.

the alpha is usually the leader

some times there are a pair of alphas, the dominate mating pair

I mean wolf packs are what you are comparing to right?

everyone else is a beta

lions, any pack animal really

with a noticeable power structure

I mentioned wolves as an example, yes, but most pack animals have this mindset, that there is a clear LEADER that all others follow.

also as Grenade said, often the leadership role is seen as a pair of alphas. An Alpha Male and an Alpha Female.

but that's only in animals.

often times, betas, usually males as you need less males than females to keep population sizes up, are forced out of the packs after a certain age. As a result, some species resort to raping the females belonging to an alphas pack, because they can't take on the alpha and win the "rights" to the females

so they sneak in, rape a female, and run away

^ also describes Feminist Male Allies surprisingly well. Betas raping the women because they're too worthless to earn a woman on their own.

while the alpha gets all the sex he wants

yes, it does, doesn't it. It fits too well.

That's why the term started being used on them.

actually i think it was just because they were so submissive

they bent over for anything a female wanted or claimed

just happens we are animals still, and most women don't seem to really want someone who just folds over

hell, i don't think most people want someone who just rolls over entirely.

It was because of their general attitude and overall way they presented themselves. Humans are animals too, so it's only natural that when someone looked at them and said "yeah... That's a fucking Beta Male." - Duh they're going to have the same traits as beta males from other pack animals.

not guaranteed, but certainly seems to be working out that way.

but the left denies science, so of course they wouldn't see the comparison.

no, nothing is 100%, but trends are trends for a reason.