Message from @Grenade123
Discord ID: 469189921542766602
Lying womanizers are only okay if they're *our* lying womanizers
Oh I'm sure theyll dig up more old-ass cases
Trump's in business. There's probably dirt somewhere. I just don't think impeachment over drama and decades old gossip is a good precedent
to be honest people have been digging for so long now id be surprised anything new comes up
Or maybe not be surprised anymore?
I mean, theres the tax returns, the so called tape, russia connections (which was just his son talking with a secetary), Stormy, and now, people going aha, putin wanted trump to win.
When Trump initially won, it was supposedly so obvious that it was because of Russia. Now a year and a half later, there's still no evidence of this being true. It's possible but those saying that it's true without a shred of evidence are mentally retarded.
If it was so obvious in 2016, how come there hasn't been a shred of evidence found yet?
yeah the only shit thats obvious is the info that got hacked n leaked but for real itsshit people shouldve know in some isntances
They needed a quick excuse and would “find” (create) the evidence later.
gouvt transparancy is key but i understand the need for security in relation to foreign interests
Well theres a balance between too much or too little
Id appreciate if they didnt record absolutely everything on everyone creating a profile
I've got an annoyance for a radio commercial in my area 'Ever wonder why people in Europe speak so many languages? Maybe it's because they use our lesson course!'
No, it's because they live in nations the size of states, with open travel policies, and neighbors that speak a different language. How about replacing 'why' with 'how', you dolts.
Sorry. Had to complain about it to someone. :p
@RyeNorth you are complaining that an advertisement advertised a product
Almost as important as complaining about people gambling in a casino
He is complaining about them advertising poorly
@Deleted User I own an internet radio station. I absolutely get advertising. The issue I take is the quality of the message. It grates on me because it sets up a premise and sets it's product up as the why, not the how.
Yeah, but with advertising, it's a given that will happen
Using their product as 'WHY' people in Europe generally speak at least two languages is weak.
They cite their product as being a major seller there, sure
but it's far more powerful and accurate to say, 'HOW' do they learn so many languages easilly and effectively? Maybe because they use our lesson course!
The 'WHY' is geopolitical. To someone informed, it's easily dismissed. to someone uninformed, it's potentially giving false information and understanding about geopolitics.
“ STDs in LA county are skyrocketing. Officials think racism and stigma may be to blame” by Soumya Karlamangla on L.A Time Los Angeles Times
Officials in California rejected the theory that their rising STDs are a result of hook up culture and not using condoms. They’ve decided it’s racism, and have a program teaching children to treat dicks like a game of hot potato.
http://archive.today/8GvHK
It's kind of a meta thing.
It's not that the advertisement is an advertisement, that they're trying to sell a product, it's that they missed an opportunity at accuracy for a grandiose angle.
It's that one word swap that gets me. Using the word Why where the word How would be more accurate to their product.
The power of one word in a message.
or how about the fact they made knowingly giving a partner an STD no longer a crime?
also how tf is it racism?!
people choosing to have sex with other people is racism?!
Did they make it no longer a crime
or no longer a felony?
might have been no longer a felony
in their attempt to lower crime by not having anything be illegal
so now instead of these people being in jail, they get a fine and are allowed to go spread STDs intentionally all day long
Its a misdemenor now
So its still a crime, just not so serious