Message from @ping

Discord ID: 495784853774663680


2018-09-29 19:38:17 UTC  

She might as well be wearing shorts 😴

2018-09-30 01:32:39 UTC  

have you guys seen this?

2018-09-30 01:32:58 UTC  

Eric Weinstein mentioned p-hacking on rubin the other day and this got recommended to me

2018-09-30 01:33:26 UTC  

i think feminists could be p-hacking to fuel their nonsense in colleges

2018-09-30 01:36:10 UTC  

*Think?* It's built into the system.

2018-09-30 01:36:20 UTC  

trudat

2018-09-30 02:24:28 UTC  

this video is fake news

2018-09-30 02:24:44 UTC  

once you license something GPL you can't revoke it

2018-09-30 02:25:24 UTC  

you can only remove the license for future revisions assuming you are the sole copyright holder

2018-09-30 02:25:54 UTC  

or have explicit permission to re-license code from all contributors

2018-09-30 02:26:48 UTC  

so at worst the linux kernel developers have to maintain something unsupported by the original contributor... which they do constantly

2018-09-30 02:27:31 UTC  

under all versions of the GPL you can't? or at least under v3?

2018-09-30 02:27:46 UTC  

under all versions of GPL

2018-09-30 02:28:06 UTC  

basically every software license

2018-09-30 02:28:39 UTC  

the exception would be the react fiasco with facebook where they could revoke your license explicitly through specific terms

2018-09-30 02:30:32 UTC  

and there are variants of BSD that google uses that allows them to revoke your license if you file suit against them over who keeps rights over the code (typically frivolous)

2018-09-30 02:30:38 UTC  

but other than that

2018-09-30 02:31:12 UTC  

no GPL license to my knowledge grants the copyright holder the ability to revoke it

2018-09-30 02:32:00 UTC  

though i haven't skimmed through all of the licenses that linux is built on

2018-09-30 02:32:29 UTC  

there might be some code from say, nvidia with this type of stuff

2018-09-30 02:32:54 UTC  

but the linux kernel maintainers would never merge code which allowed the contributor to revoke it on arbitrary grounds

2018-09-30 02:33:01 UTC  

I think the one key point is that without attempting to swap licenses, which would provoke mass commit removal requests, the Linux mainline can't prevent da ebil notzee centrists from using their code

2018-09-30 02:33:24 UTC  

Which means you can still use and modify Linux without adhering to the coc

2018-09-30 02:34:21 UTC  

there would be such a shitstorm if linux became non free software

2018-09-30 02:34:47 UTC  

there are versions of it which are not free if i remember

2018-09-30 02:34:47 UTC  

Yup

2018-09-30 02:35:20 UTC  

We're talking libre free, not free beer free fwiw

2018-09-30 02:35:27 UTC  

specific distros, not the whole thing

2018-09-30 02:35:30 UTC  

i mean a good chunk of firmware is nonfree

2018-09-30 02:35:48 UTC  

but that's because we are forced to bend over for vendors

2018-09-30 04:22:38 UTC  

NBC confirmed for <#399204742846349312>

2018-09-30 10:37:05 UTC  

lets hope the FBI Investigation goes in the right direction

2018-09-30 10:37:14 UTC  

and it shows the misconduct of the Dems

2018-09-30 13:27:04 UTC  

Either that or it shows whether or not he is innocent. And this will show the depths the dems will go down to to ensure their power stays unquestioned

2018-09-30 16:30:15 UTC  

Pretty interesting body language analysis about Christine

2018-09-30 16:30:56 UTC  

seems to check out, especially the crackly voice of her story that magically clears up and never ends up in her choking up or clearing her throat after like 5 minutes of talking that way

2018-09-30 16:35:17 UTC  

after having seen that video and hearing her read that fucking PRE-WRITTEN STATEMENT in a way that sounds like she's recounting an event that just happened yesterday in tone of voice but never choking up or clearing her throat or drinking any water this bitch is straight up lying