OK..

https://youtu.be/RgjCC8nJggQ

"Prof. Dr. Occasional Cortex" X-D

That Gnome is vicious

lel

If you see something from the Gadfather, its mostly satire.

Agenda 21.

https://mises.org/library/credit-expansion-economic-inequality-and-stagnant-wages

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgQ30cS3IJ4

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/202783932

https://youtu.be/AujhbzS4YN8

what the fuck did I just watch...

I've been saying this all long on this Discord.

It is part of why I don't agree with a lot of economic policies of Bernie Sanders.

I don't understand why people support him and I don't understand why Tim supports/supported him.

Ah, I should add this: The graphic is lifted from the video above, on minimum wage.

@Machete_HD wtf is AIPAC?

https://www.aipac.org/

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/202785868

So, they are lobbyists.
Well, can't really blame them for pushing their agenda

https://web.archive.org/web/20140125123844/http://www.iasps.org/strat1.htm

its hilarious becuae now the far left is gonna try to adopt far right points of view to try and eat away at trump's base. Im gonna make some popcorn LOLOL

shoulda put "trumps base" in quotes lol

If those points are adopted in earnest I don't care.

That would be equivalent to saying that they have been shifted to the right, which is fine by me.

They don't "remain left" while adopting points that are right wing, in earnest. That is a contradiction in terms.

dont know, dont care. its fucking hysterical.

br

b

I like this one:
**Negotiations with repressive regimes like Syria’s require cautious realism. One cannot sensibly assume the other side’s good faith. It is dangerous for Israel to deal naively with a regime murderous of its own people, openly aggressive toward its neighbors, criminally involved with international drug traffickers and counterfeiters, and supportive of the most deadly terrorist organizations.**

Should do the same for Mexico

I don't see anything too wrong in that statement.

A bit hypocritical as it's so unevenly applied, but correct as stated.

@🌸🌺🍍r u ok 🌊🍹🥥 nice read

@Undead Mockingbird `unevenly applied` where?

In regards to who happens to be a US ally.

@Undead Mockingbird trying to parse what you graphed there, where on that graph do you put the line of "jobs actively destabilizing the lives of the people doing them"?

@Undead Mockingbird if you are talking about China - they are too big of an economy unfortunately.

It's not my graph, but what I believe it's meant to show is that the amount of jobs lost to hikes in minimum wage is whatever portion would have been in price on the side of supply between the minimum wage and the point of equilibrium in which a market would have settled.

I think that's a reasonable assumption. The value of your labor has not changed. The price simply is a misstatement of its relative value under minimum wage.