Message from @whiic

Discord ID: 544647925687517186


2019-02-11 22:33:48 UTC  

The people give up freedom to be governed.

2019-02-11 22:33:58 UTC  

An example of a positive right is the right to a speedy trial

2019-02-11 22:34:02 UTC  

The government doesn’t grant rights.

2019-02-11 22:34:31 UTC  

Who grants them?

2019-02-11 22:34:36 UTC  

God!

2019-02-11 22:34:37 UTC  

God.

2019-02-11 22:34:39 UTC  

Gouuuuud!

2019-02-11 22:34:46 UTC  

the BIG G-O-D

2019-02-11 22:34:49 UTC  

People will contest if positive rights are a thing at all, often

2019-02-11 22:34:50 UTC  

Gawwwd does not exist. Sorry.

2019-02-11 22:35:04 UTC  

Then use some other higher power.

2019-02-11 22:35:08 UTC  

Doesn’t have to be god.

2019-02-11 22:35:12 UTC  

Does not exist either.

2019-02-11 22:35:17 UTC  

God as the religious one or as a shorthand for nature

2019-02-11 22:35:26 UTC  

A level above government grants them just for being people.

2019-02-11 22:35:29 UTC  

part of the reason they are called 'natural' rights

2019-02-11 22:35:35 UTC  

And even if we assumed it did exist, what are the rights granted by that higher existence?

2019-02-11 22:35:55 UTC  

@H3llbender Which are the natural rights? Which rights did God give us?

2019-02-11 22:35:57 UTC  

But having public schools that are mostly paid for by the government (taxpayers) is a good thing, as long as the government manages its resources well and doesn't tax people like crazy

2019-02-11 22:36:19 UTC  

Property rights are the natural rights.

2019-02-11 22:36:24 UTC  

For example, many (even libertarians) think copyright is natural.

2019-02-11 22:36:30 UTC  

The rights god (or nature) grant is are all the rights we have except the ones we relinquish to government.

2019-02-11 22:36:31 UTC  

Exhaustive list.

2019-02-11 22:36:32 UTC  

An illiterate person is a social outcast, in today's world

2019-02-11 22:36:46 UTC  

I think that's the biggest load of shit I've ever heard, to argue copyright monopoly as a natural right.

2019-02-11 22:36:58 UTC  

Intellectual "property" rights are postive rights.

2019-02-11 22:36:59 UTC  

Because it's "property". Property of an idea. Or word.

2019-02-11 22:37:14 UTC  

I've quite literally never talked to someone who called copyright a natural right

2019-02-11 22:37:18 UTC  

Most ancaps reject IP rights.

2019-02-11 22:37:24 UTC  

The idea is that you have all rights. The only non-rights are anything which infringes the rights of another.

2019-02-11 22:37:29 UTC  

@halfthink But isn't all property kind about positive rights?

2019-02-11 22:37:53 UTC  

Property rights are pretty much "Don't fuck with my shit"

2019-02-11 22:38:00 UTC  

@whiic no, socialised institutions to protect them are though.

2019-02-11 22:38:19 UTC  

How it becomes "my shit" and how one defines "fuck with" are various things

2019-02-11 22:38:35 UTC  

Especially when it comes to common property

2019-02-11 22:38:40 UTC  

Capital is generally required to have copyright. Since you invested something into the idea.

2019-02-11 22:38:46 UTC  

For example, is any land you circle with a fence "your land"?

2019-02-11 22:38:57 UTC  

Under some definitions, yes

2019-02-11 22:39:22 UTC  

If you can defend it, sure. You put money into circling it. Capital.

2019-02-11 22:39:26 UTC  

Capitalism.

2019-02-11 22:39:37 UTC  

"worked" land is activating a part of my memory