I quite like LVT

@H3llbender And if there's nothing wrong with Georgism or Geo-Libertarianism, what is that makes it annyoing?

I know it annoys hardline capitalists because they like to think land as property the same way niggers were property once.

Georgists do. They had a commune just north of me during the early 20th century

@whiic John Galt for example funded communal utilities in Galt's Gulch via what appeared to be a LVT

I used to be an AnCap, BTW

But what makes Georgists the most annoying?

@H3llbender have you ever read Rothbard?

They served the same social role as Commies do today

@H3llbender It is on my list

@halfthink

@H3llbender Same role? As in threatened some part of capitalism, just like slavery abolitionists did?

@H3llbender have you ever read any Austrian economists?

No

I mean, threatening to release a type of property (whether it's land or niggers), it annoys the owners.

I'm a Geo-Libertarian, btw, despite being a land-owner.

@H3llbender in what sense did you "used to be an ancap"?

@whiic As in quite literally a lot of georgist communes reorganized as communist communes

@halfthink Randian

Randians aren't ancap.

I'm used to talking to leftists

Ayn Rand was minarchist.

@H3llbender Rand was not an ancap, she even rejected the label "libertarian"

as you can clearly tell

...also Rand supported copyright because she was a selfish bitch who wanted monopoly of her writings.

@whiic same reason Milton was a Keynesian.

@halfthink No-one's perfect.

own work that you produced? how absurd

@whiic Hoppe comes pretty close.

Copyright is an interesting topic that we are all probably more likely to actually convince each other of

I personally think copyright is mostly obsolete now

@Unwound Well, that applies more to copyright than to land. And you can modify the land, but you didn't create it.

property rights only count for scarce resources. You can't steal am idea.

On the other hand, if copyright was a legit property, what is the libertarian argument against Cultural Appropriation?

At one point due to the scarcity of information copyright was useful to promote the distribution of IP

But that isn't quite a thing anymore

The purpose of copyright has always been the control of information.

Tim is awake

https://youtu.be/NAvbWeivv8o

Thr libertarian case against IP.