Message from @King Canuck
Discord ID: 464144886132768790
Also pls notice me beanie senpai
i think they do realize that youtube contains a huge media influence, but they'd like to keep that media tilted left to match the company's ideology
I want to take the guys editing, for example, the guardian
shake them a bit
and explain why sargon and co are not the bad guys
because holy fuck, as a jouranlist too i'm fucking fuming at most of the articles Tim covers from sources like them
The amount of rigorous editing and fact-checking and calls and research my program makes me (and the students and profs marking me) have to go through to make sure my article is as objective, and as correct, as possible, makes me sick to see articles like what I'm seeing out there
I've had to scrap entire stories due to finding fundamental errors in my interpretations
or, even more blatant, me not haivng enough evidence to reach the conclusions that I'm reaching through logic
As i history major i am taught to recognized bs from any primary sources, and BOI will future historian will have a field day going over the news feed these past few years
if I can't physically or tangibly prove my article's words, it gets scrapped
what do you mean from primary sources?
Sources from a person who experienced the event
"what the hell happened in the mid-late 2010's? it's like everyone simultaneously starting printing outright lies and people just believed them 🤔 "
gunna be great to look back on with that good ol' 20/20 hindsight
Here's what I think the perspective will be in hindsight
a combination of the old news panicking cause of their slow descent into death from lack of profits
Combined with the fact that crazy ideas catch on faster than ever now
the further in teh past you go the wider the acceptable primary sources is, like most information on the Aksum empire is from a greek 'historian' who may never have even went to the country but since he is the only source we have, you get the idea
Combined with the fact people can now edit out opinoins they don't like
Combined with the fact that the internet is still, in the grand scheme, brand new
will be seen as a perfect storm for reality-twisting orwellian-style news cycles to dominate until someone or something puts down some kind of "internet constitution"
🤔
You can create your own subjective reality with block buttons and confirmation bias
"People this period seem to go out of their way to make things up and then get mad about it rather than fix an actual problem"
and every two-bit hack can print whatever the fuck they want
at this point i think we really do need extranational laws for the internet
if only so that countries will stop trying to cripple it
I dread the day when im teaching history student to cite from goddman twitter
Or how about this, danger
meme history
Good
GOD
how fast does the meme-cycle spin nowadays?
i could be my own primary source
If I take a fucking nap for a day or two off the internet there's some new bullshit meme
i've found my calling in life, i must become a professor of meme history
and I have to dig for an hour to find the source
academia is DEEEEEAAAD
Okay how about this, for an example miss