Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 464218507656036353
we had an attempt to change the voting system in the UK a few years back
the whole campaign for not changing the system can be summed up as "The public are too stupid to put their desired parties in number order."
and that campaign managed to win -.-
wow, that's wild
The good ol' Blizzard "more deckslots is too confusing for players" excuse
to be fair, the public are usually stupid
i should know
i am a member of the public
aye, but to make that your campaign, and for the public to vote and agree with you?
i mean they are, but literally saying that "order these things from best to worst" is too complicated for the average person is like
that's the kind of problem we teach to preschoolers
I'm not sure if the public are stupid enough to be voting to say they're stupid, or at least smart enough to realise they're stupid
it's just one step away from saying the public is too stupid to vote so we should institute a monarchy
One man one vote. This guy here is the man, and he has the vote.
Sounds good to me. I get to be the one man, right?
the ol putin 2018 platform
Ahem
USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA.
K
This debate is hilarious https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCv1glJx5b4&t=36s
:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>
@Deleted User Gotta poison that well asap or else you might risk having to argue against what they actually have to say.
I want people to listen, which is why I posted it
open borders = free movement between allied countries, visa on entry. The US has an open borders agreement with Canada
I thought that point he made was absurd
No borders = no regulation, enforcement
So what you're saying is... 😉
I meant what he's doing in his introduction by saying that if you're not for open borders you're for violence
Can i buy cheaper guns if theres no border?
every one who ever played civilization knows you deny any open borders request
and can i exploit my workers more effectively without borders?
Lmao
He literally says "If you have men standing at the borders with guns, that isn't defense, that is initiation of violence"
How about just a wall
It worked for israel
well you get the great wall of China early
it'd a good defence
And I believe another country had a 3 foot fence?
i mean, the mongols eventually took over china
Which reduced immigration by over 90%