ofc it is, thats why i'm not out int he streets demanding the death of SJW's

Its just taht... if it happens i wont be that vocal about it anymore because these people are risking a negative future for me

Citizens won't be able to save my skin when big brother comes for my oily hide

I myself am more into how to make government more accountable to its citizens way of thinking

government is never accountable

It can be

if you wanna make government accountable, cut taxes and government programs

Not to mention impose term limits on every elected office

that way they can't go "we need your tax money for this! Oopsie now the money is gone, we need more tax money"

You can have taxes and programs

You just need food scrutiny

I think what Dr.Wol is saying is just to cut back on them a bit, not cut them entirely

I'm all for "WORKING programs" but in order to just get a bit more funding, they add more reasons to demand more money

not to mention, government is run by people, people are corruptable

People are corruptible, but they would like to believe themselves not to be

Well in my eayes the discussion how to make governance more efficient is almost missing

Its always only about cutting or increasing money

zutt, I'm not sure there is a way to make governance more efficient

There is

Its all about political culture

face it, if you want government to be more efficient, you gotta cut its funding, so that it has to improvise and make it work
If you add more funding than it needs, it can become lax because it can afford to fail a bit

i think its a curve

And if it won't work, then people themselves will find a solution that doesn't need government

and not linear

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAzj0VQmbYY

Well, you can't cut funding too far, or else the government doesn't have the power to do what it needs to do

Not today but in the future i will give you propper accounting on this

e.g. the postal service

Its a complex set of issues

cutting it too much means you cant afford certain people or machines that are highly efficient, there is a curve where you get maximum price/performance

theres a lot of things government shouldn't have the power to do, scrap it

why does the postal service need to be monopolized by a state corporation?

In my eyes we are not really utilizing well the tools we already have as a society

Well Zutt, thats because most people aren't smart enough to grasp that fact,

Thinking is difficult for many people

should be privatized ... or broken up and then privatized 😉

if you need proof, look at the 60 million Americans that voted for that democrat Goblin

Well lots of ppl dont want to care

Poptarts, why should the postal service be privatized?

But tou can work around that

In modern style democracy

why should it be monopolized is a better question?

It isn't monopolized