Yeah people disliked Ebert when he did that

yeah what vesdii said

so unless you wanna redefine the meaning of art, theres an actual limit to art

If anything is art, art no longer has utility as a word

^

also: is football art? that's a game, just in a different medium.

Video games are art where the observer has to use their hands at least a little bit.

if anything is speech, speech no longer has a utility as a word

art has to do with intention

the skill that some footballers have on the ball is art,

But the game itself isn't art

You can't tell intent

the art of war

^

Oh it was Dr.Wol that started this?

probably

i would also disagree and i would say that you could call a sport art

Prff.

Speech has a utility,

"Hate speech" has no utility if its all hate speech

Well that figures.

poetry is art, no?

Hello Scribble, glad to see you're as positive as ever 😃

not visual

creates vision

baseball as a game, to me is certainly art

so what's the difference between football and something like csgo or overwatch that makes them art instead?

Categories exist only as a result of exclusion. It is not pretentious to exclude

uniforms are art

if video games are art afterall

the stadiums are art

the stands are art

but yeah maybe you just lack imagination and choose to see the world in a boring and generic way, that is fine if you want to do that

I'll top it

"Art is art" Prove me wrong

art is art

speech is speech

woke

life is life

deep is deep

redpilled

tim is art

and this is why things like art need to have a limit, else anything can be art, and thus "art" has no meaning as a term

why should anything be limited?