Message from @devpav
Discord ID: 485884464229253170
some interesting tactics in Chemitz.. after the "silent march" https://twitter.com/Ruptly/status/1036229755908120576?s=20
Hey guys look what I spent about an hour throwing together
There's this Queen song, where the guitar sounds suspiciously similar to the doom theme
It's called More of that Jazz
yeah
looks like we have hte new agenda
Go after the donors now
Lmao i wonder if black pipl will boycott football now
„Americans protect yourself! Don‘t buy from j... republicans!“ 😒
"We must ban anyone who would provide an alternative view point and those that would support them!"
Donors rise up
The (((Republicans))) are plotting to destroy the ~~volk~~ minorities
lol
Is that why I can't get some tasty ass burgers?
football is racist
blacks are only 12% of the population, they should be represented 12% only in the football teams
how dare you ask that you racist!
Don't question the narrative!
It's a relevant question for anyone to ask about the NFL boycott.
(CTRL-LEFT MODE) Don't bring facts into this! It is about our Narative and how oprressed we feel by the CIS-WHITE-HETERO-NORMATIVE-PATRIACHY!
Alright concerning this "victory"
I'm pretty sure the lifted shadowbans is a perjury dodging move.
So when asked in these hearings "Are you shadowbanning" they can say no.
I mean. They're not in that kind of hotwater if they're asked the question "Do you plan to do it in the future" and say "No" and then end up doing it, right?
I don't think it's a victory at all. I think it's a dodge.
--Seems some youtube commenters are already saying the same. o:
And the video also sorta covers that possibility. D'oh.
surely theyll see this and just change the question to "have you ever shadowbanned anyone on twitter"
The question is how well the court is familiar with the concept of what shadowbanning is. Remember that post twitter made about "we don't shadowban people, we just make it so other people don't see their posts!"? That sort of argument would work pretty well against people who don't know what shadowbanning really is
well, they can't go back, the internet has proof now
If they testify they don't do it, then they can't go back to banning / shadowbanning, because they'll then give proof they did it to scam congress
Plok was such a hard game
I really hate adults who have no idea of concepts that are important to the most amount of people
If you don't know what a shadowban is, or don't have the aptitude to quickly learn it, you have NO PLACE deciding policy for the public.
parents just don't understand