Message from @Scribblehatch

Discord ID: 485908113921409056


2018-09-02 17:11:42 UTC  

yeah

2018-09-02 17:22:27 UTC  

looks like we have hte new agenda

2018-09-02 17:22:37 UTC  

Go after the donors now

2018-09-02 17:27:25 UTC  

Lmao i wonder if black pipl will boycott football now

2018-09-02 17:27:42 UTC  

„Americans protect yourself! Don‘t buy from j... republicans!“ 😒

2018-09-02 17:28:36 UTC  

"We must ban anyone who would provide an alternative view point and those that would support them!"

2018-09-02 17:31:32 UTC  

Donors rise up

2018-09-02 17:35:01 UTC  

The (((Republicans))) are plotting to destroy the ~~volk~~ minorities

2018-09-02 17:49:41 UTC  

lol

2018-09-02 18:15:37 UTC  

Is that why I can't get some tasty ass burgers?

2018-09-02 18:39:27 UTC  

football is racist

2018-09-02 18:40:30 UTC  

blacks are only 12% of the population, they should be represented 12% only in the football teams

2018-09-02 18:51:23 UTC  

What percentage of NFL ticket sales do blacks represent?

2018-09-02 18:51:56 UTC  

how dare you ask that you racist!

2018-09-02 18:52:12 UTC  

Don't question the narrative!

2018-09-02 18:52:25 UTC  

It's a relevant question for anyone to ask about the NFL boycott.

2018-09-02 18:54:20 UTC  

(CTRL-LEFT MODE) Don't bring facts into this! It is about our Narative and how oprressed we feel by the CIS-WHITE-HETERO-NORMATIVE-PATRIACHY!

2018-09-02 20:25:22 UTC  

Alright concerning this "victory"

2018-09-02 20:25:40 UTC  

I'm pretty sure the lifted shadowbans is a perjury dodging move.

2018-09-02 20:25:49 UTC  

So when asked in these hearings "Are you shadowbanning" they can say no.

2018-09-02 20:26:21 UTC  

I mean. They're not in that kind of hotwater if they're asked the question "Do you plan to do it in the future" and say "No" and then end up doing it, right?

2018-09-02 20:26:42 UTC  

I don't think it's a victory at all. I think it's a dodge.

2018-09-02 20:27:17 UTC  

--Seems some youtube commenters are already saying the same. o:

2018-09-02 20:29:21 UTC  

And the video also sorta covers that possibility. D'oh.

2018-09-02 20:29:40 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463054787336732683/485909198388068354/1422566484589.png

2018-09-02 20:32:18 UTC  

surely theyll see this and just change the question to "have you ever shadowbanned anyone on twitter"

2018-09-02 20:38:55 UTC  

The question is how well the court is familiar with the concept of what shadowbanning is. Remember that post twitter made about "we don't shadowban people, we just make it so other people don't see their posts!"? That sort of argument would work pretty well against people who don't know what shadowbanning really is

2018-09-02 20:39:04 UTC  

well, they can't go back, the internet has proof now

If they testify they don't do it, then they can't go back to banning / shadowbanning, because they'll then give proof they did it to scam congress

2018-09-02 20:57:24 UTC  

Plok was such a hard game

2018-09-02 20:58:48 UTC  

I really hate adults who have no idea of concepts that are important to the most amount of people

2018-09-02 20:59:15 UTC  

If you don't know what a shadowban is, or don't have the aptitude to quickly learn it, you have NO PLACE deciding policy for the public.

2018-09-02 20:59:21 UTC  

parents just don't understand

2018-09-02 20:59:43 UTC  

"I don't know what that is, I just enforce it."

2018-09-02 21:32:19 UTC  

🐵 ⬆

2018-09-02 21:33:43 UTC  

Hearing a book from '96 called very old hurts me a little bit