race purity isn't the way

I would agree that we don't want open borders to the point that white people cease to exist

but getting quotas or tryint to protect a race will only go the other way around

yes

because if not in the west, they won't have anywhere else anyway 😂

just because we are PAYING for migrants to reproduce

if they pay for their shit, they wouldn't be roleplaying bunnies

"you"

so you aren't white

I was trying to understand if you are cucking your race or just attacking whites in general 😏

their point is fair though

why should the race that built all of humanities success

cease to exist

just because the shitholers decide all to destroy it?

that's the problem

you wanna know who cares about race?

everyone else

in a way, yes 🤔

we agree on the problem, but not on the solution

CHAINA

the problem is, you can't sell the idea of a white country when you have lefties that want cheap votes

hehehe

do you have any good sources on that?

that would be good to use 😏

gotta go to bed coz I work tomorrow, but feel free to tag me if you find good sources

but jews tend to capitalism, don't they?

not as far as values go

just like single parent families are terrible for kids

personal bias =p

the thing here isn't if you care if they are gay or not

the thing is, is it good for society on average?

it isn't

maybe we are being cold about it. But trying to be naive is not a good PoV either

mate

we are taking about raising kids

not what gays do on the bed

can't we meme facts?

don't eat dem tide pods

they are bad 😏

he tries to deny facts when they are inconvinient

the short asnwer is, gay couples have a multitude of risk factors

they shouldn't adopt kids

why do these ppl have so many problems with statistics?

wait wut?

>what exactly would a mother figure provide that a femmnine man wouldn't
Is this bait?

it's not hard to find degenerates in some demografics 😏

is this the lobster chat?

lel

I came in the middle of the conversation, but, are you serious?

>There will come a point where our quality of life will be so great that we won't even need money, but again, this is way into the future.
If there is no money, there will be no freedom

if you are implying a world without freedom, it is possible

I just don't see it lasting very long

I totally agree with @RyeNorth on this

I said in this chat before about some talk about California. Let them do whatever they want and let bad ideas fail

hahahahah

Those 31 genders were written into law though

ppl tend to oversimplify problems

their "common sense" is "no guns"

but they can't say it

that's a nice one

@JadenFrostwolf tells us stuff so we can change your mind

😏

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5nyQmaq4k4

same 😂

it makes me sad that I don't have a black friend that can say it for me IRL

wait.. I don't have black friends, maybe I'm wacist! 🤔

now I want to edit Groot saying nigga 😄

lol

tbh, the victim didn't do anything wrong

who the hell schedules a fight and comes there with a knife because of a WhatsApp argument?

hehehe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyFbVA3Kop4

that is no reason for having people you don't want having kids, well, having them

doesn't that go the lines of the europeans saying refugees are good because they reproduce more?

>personally while im a transexual i want to keep my squirtgun
@Arch-Fiend rly? 🤔

@Arch-Fiend kill my curiosity. How do you identify yourself politically? do you believe gender is binary?

when you said you wanted to keep your "squirtgun" I assumed the swap was the other way around

I don't think there will be any good for society to consider gender non-binary

nah, gender isn't a new word. Gender is also useful in biology and science. If you deny gender you will go backwards in many many areas

stats also become shit

@Grenade123 I don't think I'm confusing it. Medication is gendered, stats we use to make up laws, are gendered. The left is also trying to redefine "woman" and "man".

you can deny gender roles and wait for the result of that. Denying gender exists is another thing entirely

@Grenade123 in the west, another word for "sex"

also the classical joke of asking "Sex" can be followed by "yes please", while "gender" is followed by the binary answer

gender, even if redifined, cannot be picked randomly

if you suggest scientific and well defined categories, I might be temped to agree

your point being?

gender's definition was always tied to sex. If we want (let's assume) to redefine it, do it properly at least

otherwise we can just drop "gender" and just use "sex"

my point is simple, if gender != sex, define it in a way that is useful for society

otherwise the use of the word becomes irrelevant

we are in sync then

what would be the evolution of the word? where do you think this will go?

>that will translate into an effect on psychology and also evolutionary psychology

>the only thing gender means to me that makes sense is for it to mean social and psychological sexual characteristics

>>>psychological sexual characteristics
This is not "gender", and I wouldn't call that gender

"sexual characteristics" as in physical only?

that would be useful 🤔

that would mean gender changes

which would make the word useless