words have multiple meanings. Do you not understand context?

well just from the text there it appears there was someone named lacy that was a sexist.

well you would fail to meet proper "diversity" standards.

and men and any other identity you want it to be.

thought bullshit was their best weapon? or are they the same thing?

....

As a self identifying Windup duck, I've oftened wondered why people don't just randomly give me money when they are passing near me. Now, I must assume they are WindupDuckAphobic.

actually so true it's painful.

I don't think he's all that good at debating. He's no shapiro.

i really enjoyed shapiro vs yogurt "debate", lol.

...nty.

not especially

I'm more of a carlin, or hicks fan, but especially carlin.

the problem right now, with censorship, isn't from the government (at least in the USA), it's people being okay with it. It's culture.

you think YT won't?

really?

let me do a search of infowars really quick...

good chance every one of the staff is.

i don't use google.

ya i never went along with google replacing search, as a term.

Advertising technique.

it's an appeal to emotion, instead of reason.

a bad way to argue.

Well, maybe not a bad way, because it does work...

On the social level we aren't really all that far behind. We fire and destroy people because of their thoughts or just our thoughts we project onto their words.

knife attack? ban guns.

Instead we should ban all gunblades. http://prntscr.com/ksi9y0

collapsing or changing?

and what's the distinction?

what's properly populated?

Is that why? I thought it was suicide.

LIke that biking couple that didn't believe in "evil".

so far removed from problems they don't actually believe they exist.

the point is still they were very ignorant.

i think jordan peterson has a point, suffering creates meaning. We are creating our own suffering to have meaning.

or start a war... with massive loss of life.

I blame porn and sex toys. Don't need to leave the house anymore. Just wait for sex robots to go mainstream.

and VR, ofc.

might be true, but which is greater.

you seem to disagree that people don't want that, while I agree some might want more.

the bullet is.

i don't watch american anime

curious though, if viability is a part of the abortion argument, will artificial wombs change things on that part of the argument...

obviously if you don't, you are transphobic.

well it's in quotes, so it obviously does not actually mean do not eat.

aren't they already doing that in parts of the world, aborting the females and having the males?

could be some urine soaked eggs.

i don't use twitter, never will.

ofc i'd probably be censored/banned there anyway, cuz of my wrongthink

that's not much, non politcal stuff...

yes, it's a publisher, like most social media sites, not a platform.

well, maybe not most, but the popular ones...

Sounds to me like an argument against diversity. If everyone has this one goal....everyone being different is okay....but if everyone has this one goal...is that diversity?

Chaos in a box.

without the box it spills all over, with the box, it's orderly.

What's the box? I only see the diversity police pushing chaos.

It's not religion, it's not morality, it's not law, it's not country....what is it?

oh, i agreed, the rest was just me pondering, though genuinely curious.

if by germans you mean their government and by weird you mean an example of how to monumentally fail over and over again.

thinking it's something in the water.

ya didn't they remove the swimsuit part?

wtf is that hsit.

curious how much tv ratings are down in general.

i mean, with online alternatives.

because they are exposed

or just insane, or maybe both...

think about it, youtubers are becoming the modern celebrities.

well nobody wants that,

if it can't be controlled it must be squashed.

my point is that the structure is becoming more decentralized. that's creating panic, not only in industry but in government. Which is why you have things like internet censorship starting to take the forefront. It must be controlled or squashed.

a strong 3rd world nation

keep us all so busy trying to feed ourselves, we don't notice the leashes.

oh, he made a vid, that's what u guys are talking about.

ya, definitely a disagree with him, but only because he hasn't completely thought the idea through. It's like a house with many rooms, more rooms is fine and dandy and good, but it has to be built on a solid foundation.

well that just complicates my simile

i'm taking diversity to the most general definition.

Imagine if you have a goal, the goal is to win a math competition. One team has nothing but mathematicians. The other team has a cook, a carpenter, a telemarketer, a pizza delivery man, etc. Who do you think is more likely to reach the goal?

exactly. in genetics, the unifying force is life.

well, i would say the goal changes and that's what I asked earlier. mentioning chaos in a box. What's the box?

Not sure that's really the case anymore...and that's where ppl have a problem with diversity.

they don't know what the box is, what the goal is, what the foundation is. Diversity can only be a strength when there is a commonality.

in his genetic example. Change the species, you have a cat and a dog. Is that diversity a strength?

So, like I said. I agree diversity can be a strenght, but I disagree that it must be.

ok, ima watch the rest now, maybe he covers these points in what i haven't watched.

well if you think that law is our commonality, I would agree.

a lack of enforcement...we can no longer breed.

we are too diverse. cat and a dog.

i don't watch youtube anymore, if i can help it.

generally we take it case by case.

for example. when someone breaks the law...

it's diversity amongst mcdonalds.

some allow, some don't, that is diversity.

this is why i think tim's thought was just not thought out completely. maybe he was rushed, or maybe his leftist bubble is real 😛

likely.

context, that's why i took it to the most general definition. differences

there was actually an interesting paper a teacher handed out that kind of pointed the differences in perspective of cultures out.

it was describing standard things that americans take for granted, in a very odd way, the way an outsider might see them. To show us, how our perspectives are different.

https://thesocietypages.org/toolbox/nacirema/

Anyway, when the fundamentals of the west are being asked to be changed. That we are individuals, that we have rights and responsiblities, that we are all the same under the law, etc. That kind of diversity is not a strength. That's a recipe for chaos.

As we can see being played out...