why does a manual laborer need mod status tho?

especially if a node js script can replace em?

tshirt is the only one with a platform besides posting more porn and scat

bring order to the server, mod war now

the tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and capricious mods

EU gonna sack them memes, boys

mods should be emotionless judges and executioners of the law

no fatty faggots allowed

mod war now, +giveme 3000

but u already got 700 pounds

nintendo prolly sued their asses

_but look how extravagant 300 burgers on a table look like_

that entire story was a nothing hamberder

but I enjoyed the a e s t h e t i c s

mcdonalds on silver platters

#unmuted

I'd try that

neat, but why?

the cosmos is a jewish conspiracy

✡ ✡ ✡

kangs

@Abdul cool man have fun being ruled by nerds

ooga booga

the wild west wasn't as bad

wild west was done right

tribalism exists in every system tho

service guarantees citizenship

@Abdul cool man but that's how ya grow as a person

being handed shit makes it worth nothing

whities need to earn to not be treated like spergs

durum has turkish girl in it

because she had a white bf

eh, tender meat

do a flip lol

deus vult my dudes

ah sorry, I thought it already was

deus vult vult vide

rigged

the ruling class picks whomever they want, this is why democratic socialism is a pipe dream

💦 💦 💦

appropriately moisurized channel

owo put the cummies in the bag

🔫

oy fookin mad lad https://www.bbc.com/news/live/uk-politics-49073992

<:smugon:512048583806025739>

I hope boris changes the voting system too so ukip won't split the vote for the tories and britistan gets a labour government

at least corbyn would tackle the jq tho

trudeau at least looks pretty

would fuck ngl

@slow the bong version of hosting the apprentice

@Kamaitachi do they police tweets as much as scotland yard tho?

taxation is theft tho

on what assumption?

how can you be sure tho that it's that what improves the country or is the only available way?

how are you sure tho, that the money ends up in the right places? nobody besides unelected beurocrats decide that, not you, right?

the public medical and regulated pharmaceutics system has massive issues, how can you be sure that this is the only alternative?

so you take by force and accept that most of it gets to waste, misassigned or ends up in private hands just to substitude a system with massive cost, poor quality and other issues

if you get stolen from all the time, why would you bring up effort to gather new resources if you knew you'd just get them taken awayyy again? @Tonight at 11 - DOOM

sure, and some of it is likely hidden under the matress, but it surely isn't a good incentive to gather a lot, especially under a progressive system of theft, right? @Tonight at 11 - DOOM

and even besides that, the necessity to survive is then used to make others do the work in order to be able to continuously steal from them? sounds like a racket to me

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM by what circumstances would all get stolen instead of just some of it?

so if I take 10$ from you and give you back 1$ later, that's benifiting the racketed?

but what other scenario are you speaking of where I'd not get anything in return instead of at least a fraction?

despite big government here, things get stolen all the time. tho maybe that has also something to do with people barely being allowed to defend themselves or their property

it is tho

you even agreed it's a racket

despite government things still get stolen so it appears to me like a poor argument

`a failure of the system does not mean it's a bad system` that's the fallacy socialists use

thanks, but that seems like a poor argument to me. since we can have the case that under big gov little gets stollen, a lot gets stolen, or there's no gov and a lot gets stolen or little gets stolen. so I don't see the correlation

I do see a correlation tho with the allowing of gun ownership and self defense

poor argument again

but the government can just as well take your property. what makes it so different? after all, it's also just a bunch of people. none of them even know you unlike your neighbours who would have to live with the consequences of being close to people they angered

`gov does not want to take ALL of your property` how do you know? under an authoritarian state for instance everything is practically subject to the state

@Weez but the courts are part of the government. how can you be sure that they would decide in your favor instead of for themselves? what incentive is there for the court?

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM big government overspend and overpromise, the people running it are there for a limited time in which they often just want to rack up power and money, is that not true? if so, why would they think in the long run by for instance not killing the goose which lays the golden eggs, you?

not quite

you call me daft yet do not know the argument I was even making

yes, but how is that related to no government?

it is tho

for one I think that governments can get along with much lesser resources, looking at how enormous the waste, mismanagement and corruption is. and yes, taxation is theft. the very least is that we can reduce it. the west for instance is the most generous in giving. government ran programs aren't the only option. the government shouldn't be involved in our lives and at best be just the access point to foreign governments, be it in defense or diplomacy while being restrained by the threat of an armed populus

`(U really should rename yourself to "Shmutz", would sound WAY more Jewish, lol)` you're the one advocating for big scale institutionalized robbery

@Weez yes, the government needs to manage every aspect of your live

@Weez other people

@Weez if you think that then I truly applaud your self confidence about how long you could go from house to house before finding a match, and be fast enough so people don't collect against you

the government is causing inflation

like, who's printing all the money? lol

is that the warlord argument?

maybe that's why the constitution even mentions a well organized militia

because like you said a bit earlier, economics is indeed not everything. people want to protect not only them but their fellow man

you mean where there's also a corrupt socialist government despite being mostly impotent compared to the local war lords?

that's great, we agree. we must have the same amount of daftness then

taking the land of white farmers is not akin to dekulakization?

the state did the deed tho

and riled people up

zimbabwe was once the bread basket of the region

south africa will follow suit

the state certainly wasn't helping or somehow thru government magic was ensuring any safety of the individual, was it?

I agree

if your insults are a lack of argument.
sure, I can point at a time where government didn't work and you where _it worked_ basing on that while it happened to be that there was a government around during a pieceful period that it must be because of it. this again is correlation, not not necessarily causation.
what makes you so sure that a government is always, without doubt, not only the best, but the only way to defend the individual? ecpecially in europe, where people aren't even really allowed to defend themselves but instead just have to get stabbed and wait for police, who possibly might fear to appear racist if they do something