stone age communism is only true communism

Its your life and you decide what to do, however you still show shame for what you did therefore what you did doesnt even sti well with you. However your actions and your body interacts with the world around you. As such others have a right to judge you, to even banish you from their society if they so choose.

LSD apparently gives you interesting trips

Weed of all things i would find acceptable at say 18, no reason to try it before that that and doing it willy nilly is foolish and well... can lead to becoming vegatative...

Nothing ater death" -> goes in the face of a lot of evidence to suggest that there is something but we cant put our fingers on it.

(im citing near death experiences here)

(sadly im still rather empirical 😦 )

most likely a being of light, thats what most peole describe seeing

also there is a phenomena that people say you see 360* in all directions, try wrapping your head around how that would be like

what ever happened to prugatory

purgatory 😮

honestly dante made purgatory more appealing than heaven or hell

also the new doom is absolutely based, and red pilled, ultimate chad backstory too

I mean empirically thats not impossible

So basically import the issue of polygamy into the west, so if everyone is a cousin fucker no one can be a cousin fucker?

Fash gang when

under fuedalism i think you have the most pro worker system, only 36 work hours a week the rest was for personal dev or simply doing what you wanted

the balkans are still genetically mostly slavic, fun fact there

originally the blkans were Illyrian and something else

@Enclave This is objectively untrue, slavic DNA there was suprisingly preserved and a minority turns out has that DNA, the turkish DNA is basically washed out versio of what it was, it made them darker and thats about it, and not even all of them

Slavs are unwhite? im confused, you guys are giving me an identity crisis xD

true ^

I mean depends on how long the turks took over an area.

If europe was islamic Hitler would be a walk in the park compared to wha tIslam would produce

what? The serbs are slavs, what? They have majority slavic DNA and they would kil; you for saying they are turkish. Because its objectively wrong, i can bring up their DNA studies

@Enclave https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Serbs

Serbs are so little turkish that the DNA is miniscule, suprisingly outbreeding certain DNA traits takes literally interbreeding everyone.

IDK much about bulgars, but greeks arent turks, they might have more turkish DNA than say the serbs but they are still majority greek. Hence why they dont have an identicle culture or temperament.

I like my model of original land, if possible return land ot their original ethnicities unless the ethnicity no longer exists or hasent been there literally in thousands upon thousands of years

the balkans were occupied by slavs before the ottomans, before that by illyrians and Dacians? who no longer exist. Serbs also gave the ottomans a mighty run for their moen y if i remember correctly and won, also setting themselves free from austria hungary, and then WWI happened

If the turks bothered invading the balkans the the slavs would literally unite and descend like some horrible shadow of death, I dont think hussar charges could compare to the rage that would be unleashed and the sheer man power

its a one way ticket to destructon there, not to mention europe uniting to literally pick turkey to shreds

happened once under vienna

it can happen again

Im not talking NATO, Slavs would literally be forced to unite. Its something that would have to happen and Russia would no longer support turkey

youd create a new nato essentially

Slavato

>

?

Big think

@Gremblo Is that not from that edgy game where you play the super edgy serial killer top down shooter?

!rank

AnpPrim -> episode 3: revenge of the Ooga Booga

RA Ruggedman is pretty good

eminem is shit compared to him

@O. paxarbolis Reduce caloric intake, especially eliminate all sweets, 1 hours workouts 5 days a week, 1 day 30 min 1 day rest so -> Mon/Tue -> medium/ hard, Wed 30 min medium/ easy, Thur/Fri -> hard/ medium, Saturday 2X1 hour or simply 1 hour, easy.

Major thing is reduce how much you eat, only eat when hungry, NO SWEETS OR JUNK FOOD, for women light weights or cardio is great women respond differently than men to different excercise but hte same rules apply, mmix strength and cardio (martial arts workouts, such as kickboxing are GREAT for bburning fat.) You have no excuse because calisthenics are a thing (plenty of resources online, I have never lifted weights in my life and i keep myself fit only with calisthenics, im too poor for a gym).

So yeah thats a very general kind of plan, only heavy days should leave you feeling somewhat sore the next day, a gentle good sore not a painful sore, any sore of painful soreness is reason to take a break

But yeah do that 2 weeks straight and after that itll be routine

I mean sort of? Nothing beats true power IMO that is the ability to kill anyone for any reason at any time. To be such a threat that the moment you choose to end someones life that there is nothing they can do about it makes you absurdly powerful in the world. That is combined with the will to power, to simply do.

This would make the wealthy and powerful truly powerful as this is somthing they can do, they can do as much as they please in terms of harm and no one is gonna hurt them (unless its someone like im describing but lets face it... how realistic is that?)

This video is pretty interesting he also has a vid on turning postmodernism against itslef however his analysis of symbols is meaningful and should be considered when we look towards propagating nationalism into the future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QG3_LNz0dM

"Symbols nad propaganda in pop culture"

(the polish version that someone made with subtitles the original is the name at the end. Irrespective of his other vids the symbol vids are spot on IMO)

also someone once introduced me to the ideas of signs vs symbols and I cam e to the conclusion that if signs are leaves, or shapes of animals and an organic world, then the meaning of symbols which are abstract is determined by the sign they are paired with

So you have a scene of say a bull and a man riding on the bull and he lifts an object towards the heavens and somethig weird is going on there and the symbol is say idk, a square with a circle inside it.

it adds definition to a symbole that had no definition befor ethat

unless you define it before applying it to a scene in which case it in fact changes the meaning of the scene

(ive been trying to figure out the psychology of geometry and symbols because IMO this is one of the major ways we fight the culture war, symbology)

Its important to note that in Ukraine the conflict has bled both sides extremely, however Kiev is on the genocide path bombing and regularly killing civilians as was the govorments supporters goal from day one (Odessa massacre) and the war started not with a declaration of war, but with strafing runs on civilians of which there are videos which I recommend anyone watch.

The war however has attracted a lot of mercanaries, the US is arming Kiev ad it is reasonable to assume that it is supplying them with a steady stream of mercanaries. Donbas in need of well armed fighting men will accept anyone it can get, Kiev being national socialist, or rather supporting Banderism, has attracted such forces as the Azov battalion, and this has motivated legitimate antifa, or other communist militias and mercanaries to fight for free really. Giving Donbass much needed help. As such I support Donbass and the history of Ukraine puts it in a position that much of its modern land was not ethnically ukranian nor originally settled by ukrainians. As such I also support DOnbass in its right to secede and for Kiev to respect this right as they have a legitimate claim to this and I condemn their genocidal war. @Euro-American Bandit

I dont thin pan slavism is a good idea @Doctor Anon Its.... well.... a one way street to eradication of all slavic cultures and merging them into what would be russia. I like the idea of a Slavic brotherhood, or slavic Sojusz, based on militayr cooperation first and foremost and beyond that very broad and basic and clear rules. A list of 10 comandments so to speak (polish here 😄 ). I would recommend bringign back ancient slavonic or at least glagolictic as a formal second language and slavic dialogue which would be used in all buerocratic or international matters (also making trade simply easier). As well as elected representatives by the nation which can be removed at any moment should the vote reach a certain threshhold.

(why the fuck do i always write such massive walls of text, i need to learn to be conciese,)

@Doctor Anon I thought pan slavism mandated that essentially a slavic culture emerge or allowed for simply one sided domination, a guy did an interesting video on pan slavism and something else. However the system you speak of is something I agree with, beig that there must be equal and equally weighed representation as we are brother and sister nations and this makes us prone to bickering. However I would not support uniting it into a union or single political entity

(the guy is called slavic affairs and hes Serbian I think, and has some cool vids, music and all)

I mean you can form a state based o ethnic lines, for example Poland is majority, and I mean 80% + lechite tribe descendants, with Kaszubians and potentially sillesians thrown into the mix. Other than that we are one tribe one ethnicity and generaly when speaking of values and culture, they have to be tied to a forefather myth or legend, something to tie them down and make them real, otherwise they will change literally every generation. People need a sense that they are incarnation of a set of values and culture of their forefathers (which they are) than simply a set of esoteric values that have well, nowhere to be pinned down to.

I do agree in the autonomy part inso much that related, however not necessarily closely related, ethnicities should have some proper representation such that they simply dont feel isolated or dwarfed or suffocated adn as such want to participate in the commonwealth.

Yes fasting is a good thing, this is popularly taught at least in my uni, biochem and physio profs tell us regularly and generally looking at the mountain of data that we have its evident rather regular fasting is good for you. (especially gut health). Also a cheat day is really good for helping you curb idk if you have a sugar addiction. Generally speaking its good to not eat at least 2 hours before going to bed, by the time you wake up you are fasting, ghrelin is released and when you become hungry and feel legitimate hunger, you have released ghrelin and that is pumping growth hormone like there is no tomorrow. Thanks yo this you will, suprisingly, recover faster and better and feel better. After fasting for a day or two (so eating once or twice a day, or generally just eating when hungry until you arent hungry) the false sensation of hunger generated by pleasure seeking behaviour vanishes.

However cravings for sugar etc. might persist for 2-3 days more. However fight throug it and that will also vanish. (Eating mostly meat is also a good idea, and having some carbs is necessary. You will not grow without carbs, makign growth hormone useless and you will start to degenerate rather than grow)

(or so my physio lectures and biochem lectures say)

@Vilhelmsson Isnt there a legitimately nationalist party in sweden called alternative for sweden who are calling to depot all non swedes?

Also sargon is literally a liberal and radical individualist

ironically he is a proto SJW, nothing more really, and still harps on about being anti collectivist

its just sad now and simply retarded on his part, at leat his consistent i guess.

yeah I saw some chanell point them out to me and I realized how bad it is in sweden that sweden democrats are being seen as something nationalistic

Either way this may be the start of the swing back, the issue is do they have the time to swing back, or will they be defeated by their own democratic process and anti soverinty and exclusivity

So I saw this from Sargon today, irinically im still subbed to his FB, when I said sargon is a proto SJW I meant it.

"Race is a social construct. Same with gender, sexuality and anything else that can be considered as part of a social interaction between people."

this was in response to someone, he then goes to say-> "n fact, they are ALL influenced by biology. The point of a social construct is for human society to deal with a facet of reality which we encounter in everyday life. It's necessary to tie it to biology." as his defense on his opinion os the social construct of race etc. Albeit these being facts of existence rather than esoteric notions that social constructs tend to define.

and then: "Yes, it's called learning. I was wrong in 2017, I am correct now." In refrence to a 2017 video he made where the evidence demonstrated that race is something that matters whether or not the society is aware of it or not, and to an extent therefore ethnicity falls under the same issue. Social constructs are something that makes into tradition, that is invented with certain reasons. Man and women are not social constructs and their gender expressions are not social constructs either, however the way we treat women and men are social constructs so in this case it would mean legally, financially, etc.

So yeah

Sargon has literally become a proper leftist

my proto SJW theory was correct, I mean its not like he differed from SJW's on his philosophical foundations much or at all, and was a radical individualist. Meaning this was literally bound to happen

2015 sargon was best, at least then there was his original idea of Marxist Sargonism (which wasnt unfounded and was actually quite well constructed as far as a starting point for some economic model and later ideology)

Politics is an agressive thing, and we have two ways to go about it, agressive verbal sport such that blood may quench the thirst of the masses, alternatively we may fling fecal matter, or just shitpost.

But I would say that liberals are leftists, they can range from proerply let to center left, however the positions of liberalism put it firmly in the camp of the left and this is also why the left has been defined by liberalism for the past, what, 50-100 years?

They can be, but most venture and drift off to the left, radically. Finding a right wing liberal is often almost impossible. There are these outliers but so few and far ebetween. Id put classical liberals in the center.

firmly in the center.

Liberalism cant really be nationalist, but then agian I need to review on the core tenants of liberalism and the logic of it

generally its issue from what I remember being is that its radical individualism was the issue

but thats from when I last read up on liberalism and I had little time to do so

:/

Zeiglar is right

in terms of the history of communism in russia

it was more of an oppressive ideology meant to well... genocide millions

I know, Id say people were loyal to the idea of the great soviet Russia, this mythical ethereal spirit of the russian people, that simply took on a new name. The loyalty was there during the war, however afterwards its hard to say they were particularly loyal.

I mean the communists did do a few things right, my grandfather remembers those right things fondly and hates the new capitalist system for ruining them and literally fucking up the population by doing so

mostly things like availability of work, govorment work programs, public transport being heavily inveted in and certain sectors as well

He hated a lot of it as well, but his longing for a time for those specific programs to return is not without raeason, and its because they worked

(Also interetingly my grandfather was a member of the communist party, in his local city, he was however at one point too idealist and actually wanted to help people. This was an issue so they stormed his and my aprents apartament trying to find something incriminating because he just wasnt good at making people miserable. He also is and was veyr anti jewish, mostly because of his experience during the war and then during communism when he was in the party.)

nationalistic soviets?

as far as IQ goes, most of it has to do with nutrition i the neonatal period of life, where lack of calories is devestating, later it becomes less noticable, and eventually in adulthood you cant really modify your IQ that much with just nutrition, if at all.

and I have still no idea who we should hope for in sweden however as far as anything goes

I predict that politically very little will change, Sweden might become a little more right wing, with pressure before taking a major left wing swing once again, eventually this may very well see sweden basically seperating into a southern shit hole and a northern chad

Sorry i misspoke

I meant to say as far as the nutrition part of it goes, most of .....

rather i made a blanket statement *facepalm*

I mean in neonatal you lose 1 IQ point for some every X tie you are malnourished, it can literally make someone retarded which is why its important

and the speed is veyr very fast, but generally how does this relate to "true" IQ, maximum potential IDK, I just know how nutrition affects

it, IQ is also great for diagnostics