bet they will still be complaining about the big evil white man

There is nothing we can do.

Tbh I'm thinking of just flying to Russia or Poland before everything collapses.

because once they erode free speech, gun ownership, etc.. war will be inevitable

I don't see whites winning because most of them are too sheltered

and divided

They have all been brainwashed

they will wake up too late and wait until the very last minute to do anything

can't win a war without guns but they'll try to take it away from whites

they'll do ridiculous stuff like, say you are a neo-Nazi so therefore that is a felony, and felons cannot have guns

or say you are "mentally ill" if you say stuff contrary to the consensus

therefore, mentally ill people cant have guns

they will do more false flags until bleeding heart liberals "regulate" away gun ownership

precisely

USA is headed into a man made crisis

Unless the true right gets into positions of power

professorship and education board positions, politics, media

or anything else that shapes the human mind.

or getting patriots into positions of high finance

to fund their side.

but it will be tough to do, since finance, state dept., education is dominated by jews and leftists

white patriots will need to overwhelm those depts. fast in enormous numbers

I have an idea

create a satirical website that exposes propaganda

So with all these hypocritical leftist media outlets, change the roles or names for every crazy article that they put out

to show their insanity

similar to the Onion

^that is exactly the type of stuff I was talking about earlier

"right wing propaganda"

russian times

lawyers tend to be scum

Karl Marx as ugly santa

why can't one have political positions regardless of party/left-wing/right-wing platform

most US party platforms are just a mush of different ideas due to party shifts/realignments

for example, decades ago in my state, being a conservative used to be a large characteristic of the Democratic party. But around the 80s-90s there was a shift of the white Christians towards the Republican Party, because the Democratic Party began to support abortion and the Republican Party didn't

Ronald Reagan also played a huge role in the shift of the religious towards the Republican party

so yeah most Republicans continue to be anti-abortion because the party's previously realigned supporters, are now established baby boomers and the Repiblicans want to keep them voting for R

Anyways, the 2 party system here is broken, its just a scramble for votes at this point.

and Jesus was not a socialist, at least not in the way we traditionally think of it.

Also, there is a huge difference between simply observing colonialism and using it to justify violence/hate/discrimination against whites. By that same "logic", the leftists should also be violent/discriminate against Turks because of the Armenian genocide, and against Japanese because of their imperialism against China

we can't move forward if the leftists keep wanting to bring up stories of violence they've never even experienced, and then using it to claim victim status so they can gain all of the power with none of the responsibilities.

all movements have someone funding it

the main reason why corporate CEO billionaires are pseudo-left wing is because they want to use a powerful govt. to write legislation that favors their companies, specifically incumbent corporations

the reason for this is that companies need a lasting competitive advantage in order to earn above avg. profits

the only competitive advantage that is lasting and most effective is barriers to entry; in other words, reducing competition, because competition lowers prices, and lowering prices cut into profits esp. when the cost structure cannot be changed and costs cannot be reduced

anyways, for example, one of the reasons brand medications are expensive is because there is limited competition in the pharmaceutical sector. There's almost no such thing as new companies being created from nothing and then rising to compete with larger companies on price. most pharmaceutical startups either get acquired or sell IP to larger companies

due to pharmaceutical companies not facing significant competition, prices dont fall. expensive FDA testing is also another reason but thats another story

I don't think the govt. is very capable of setting prices that are in line with market supply and demand

govt. is not subject to massive losses like ccorporations are bc govts. can raise taxes to make up for inefficient use of resources, which can prevent prices from going lower in line with what people can afford

govt. does not always pay for all the meds in the USA. I used to work in a pharmacy too btw and medicare is a joke

the govt. is not good at using resources efficiently, so the cost of production could be set way higher than what it needs to be

thats one of the reasons why the Great Depression in usa lasted so long was because of price and wage controls to "help" farmers

all it did was prevent people from affording food and other necessities , but John M. Keynes said "oh look there is a lack of 'aggregate demand', and a 'shortage of money', therefore lets give people money to stimulate economy and inc. aggregate demand" but he never reasoned that the reason why there is a lack of agg. demand is because people can't afford it because the prices were too high-they wouldn't come down to market levels. Keynes is a classic example of an economist confusing correlation for causation

also, consider that during the reign of the Soviet Union, the govt. would look at department store magazines from countries with freer markets, look at their prices, and use a similar price to set the price of Soviet shoes. If that doesn't say massive failure of communist govt. to set prices independently of capitalism, idk what to tell you.

the FBI crime data actually lumps whites and hispanics together, which inflates the crime rate stats of "whites"

migration is not a huge boon to capitalism

the economic studies on immigration and economics are done with a biased narrative in mind

the economic growth has rarely exceeded the birth rates when society was more traditional

there are enough natives

but have to get rid of toxic feminism first

capitalism = benefits to corporations only

capitalism =/= benefits to corporations only

excuse my typing.

today's corporations are not the same as proponents of free market capitalism

not quite, most corporations want privitized benefits and want to socialize the losses by making others pay for their mistakes

privatized**

You confuse crony corporatism with free market capitalism

It is both-but the state has a choice to grow a backbone and say no to the corporatista. If Paul Volcker could do it in the 80s, it can be done today

corporatists**

The natural monopoly is a total myth

The only way a company can remain a continual monopoly is through govt. protrctions , hence barriers to entry

protections **

so you don't believe that competition prevents monopolies?

An excess of Capital is not needed to prevent breakup of monopolies-most so called "monopolies" eventually crumble due to innovation, competition, and their own managerial incompetence.

Fot example, in the book "The Innovator's Dilemna", he mentions companies that disrupt the dominant incumbent corporations through disruptive technologies. Microsoft vs IBM, Steel mini mills vs larger older but less efficient companies, etc..

For example**. I don't use autocorrect on my phone

IBM did not want to acquire microsoft

because the then small PC market (a few million) did not solve the growth needs of the multi billion dollar IBM.

the book explains it better than I.

Goldman Sachs manipulates commodity markets

and look who gets into top govt. positions after working for GS- none other than former GS employees

yes-so under real capitalism innovation is rewarded

Goldman Sachs is a sheltered hedge fund that pretends to be a bank though

most of their money, like 70% cones from trading

not quite, the banking laws and regulations make it impossible to start a new investment bank

talking about hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars needed for compliance

and that is why industry veterans should not be in govt. You are describing regulatory capture

When a GS CEO is appointed to be Secretary of the Treasury, that is like putting a fox in charge of the hen house.

what do you mean

So you think that govt. cannot prevent capitalist abuse . Then why be a communist at all if they can't stop it?

Govt. abuses people too

To me, govts. and corporations are becoming more totalitarian in nature via cronyism ,but the communists' answer is always that the govt. should be in charge instead

what is the difference between a corporate monopoly and a govt. that acts like a monopoly?

Economics and finance is everything though

you are right that social issues and economics are related. That is why it is important, even though earlier you said economics was not important.

and**

the West died because of the Fed screwing up international finance and thus getting involved in foreigm wars. That has nothing to do with truly free markets and everything to do with bankers pulling politicians' strings to destroy countries, so they can rebuild them afterwards for 5-10x returns.

the economy will crash

and the global elite actually do on ocassion benefit from it because they buy at discounted prices

banks do not support free markets