ouroboros
Discord ID: 270927439956279306
114 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2
here's the professors speech
lol
I still am very split on the Jews
German Autism at it's finest
think about the environment goy, no one else will
Dr. Sakaluk,
My roommate had some reading assigned to him in class and I decided to read the article as well. I felt like some of the claims that it made were wrong and I wanted your opinion. Below is a quote from the article.
โThere is no biological basis for classifying race according to skin color instead of body formโor according to any other variable, for that matter. All that exists is variability in what people look likeโand the arbitrary and culturally specific ways different societies classify that variability. There is nothing left over that can be called race. This is why race is a myth.โ
Itโs my understanding that we can almost exactly classify people, surely not based on some phenotype but based on things like haplogroups and mitochondrial DNA. Putting people into a "Race" is surely a shallow classification but it could be done. Is this incorrect? This article later goes on to talk about how Americans believe that an Avocado is a vegetable because they eat it in salad but a Brazilian will tell you itโs a fruit because they eat it with sugar; and that just like this example cultural differences change the perspectives of people. This still doesn't change the fact that an Avocado is a fruit. I feel like this article conflates a lot of scientific topics. Specifically saying that simply because there is no accurate way to classify people based on phenotype that there is no way to classify them at all. Am I wrong?
I've gotten to a point where debating people on this has become tiresome. I've just become smug and sarcastic. If you're debating someone about race realism ask them to describe the process of Evolution to you. Ask them to describe the specific selection pressures that confer adaptations to mammals and how they work. If a person doesn't understand the biological principle of Adaptive Radiation then debating them will literally go nowhere.
I've realized the most vocal people discussing and pushing the (((Narrative))) that we are all the same have no idea what they are talking about.
In spite of all that
I can't tell you how much I enjoyed speaking with you. I will be out-of-town for the next month, but I definitely want to get together with your group later in the Fall.
Thanks for sending the article. I know Pigliucci through science, and in fact, he reviewed parts of one of my books.
Doug Whitman
that's the e-mail i recieved from Whitman
It goes very deep. One of the many things that shook me awake to not only the corruption and sinster nature of these people but to darker threads underneath. Saturn worship, paedophilia, the cults of death and their practices. It lead me deep down into symbology, esoteric thought and study of ancient near east religions
114 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2