ouroboros

Discord ID: 270927439956279306


114 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2/2

2017-05-25 18:40:17 UTC [Safe Space 3 #rr]  

here's the professors speech

2017-05-25 18:43:35 UTC [Safe Space 3 #rr]  

lol

2017-05-25 18:43:51 UTC [Safe Space 3 #rr]  

I still am very split on the Jews

2017-05-25 19:29:24 UTC [Safe Space 3 #news]  

German Autism at it's finest

2017-05-31 22:03:19 UTC [Safe Space 3 #news]  

think about the environment goy, no one else will

2017-07-10 04:19:34 UTC [Safe Space 3 #rr]  

Dr. Sakaluk,
My roommate had some reading assigned to him in class and I decided to read the article as well. I felt like some of the claims that it made were wrong and I wanted your opinion. Below is a quote from the article.
โ€œThere is no biological basis for classifying race according to skin color instead of body formโ€”or according to any other variable, for that matter. All that exists is variability in what people look likeโ€”and the arbitrary and culturally specific ways different societies classify that variability. There is nothing left over that can be called race. This is why race is a myth.โ€

Itโ€™s my understanding that we can almost exactly classify people, surely not based on some phenotype but based on things like haplogroups and mitochondrial DNA. Putting people into a "Race" is surely a shallow classification but it could be done. Is this incorrect? This article later goes on to talk about how Americans believe that an Avocado is a vegetable because they eat it in salad but a Brazilian will tell you itโ€™s a fruit because they eat it with sugar; and that just like this example cultural differences change the perspectives of people. This still doesn't change the fact that an Avocado is a fruit. I feel like this article conflates a lot of scientific topics. Specifically saying that simply because there is no accurate way to classify people based on phenotype that there is no way to classify them at all. Am I wrong?

2017-07-11 17:01:28 UTC [Safe Space 3 #rr]  

I've gotten to a point where debating people on this has become tiresome. I've just become smug and sarcastic. If you're debating someone about race realism ask them to describe the process of Evolution to you. Ask them to describe the specific selection pressures that confer adaptations to mammals and how they work. If a person doesn't understand the biological principle of Adaptive Radiation then debating them will literally go nowhere.

2017-07-11 17:03:44 UTC [Safe Space 3 #rr]  

I've realized the most vocal people discussing and pushing the (((Narrative))) that we are all the same have no idea what they are talking about.

2017-07-11 17:05:12 UTC [Safe Space 3 #rr]  

In spite of all that

2017-07-11 17:05:17 UTC [Safe Space 3 #rr]  

I can't tell you how much I enjoyed speaking with you. I will be out-of-town for the next month, but I definitely want to get together with your group later in the Fall.


Thanks for sending the article. I know Pigliucci through science, and in fact, he reviewed parts of one of my books.


Doug Whitman

2017-07-11 17:05:37 UTC [Safe Space 3 #rr]  

that's the e-mail i recieved from Whitman

2017-07-23 20:24:21 UTC [Safe Space 3 #news]  

It goes very deep. One of the many things that shook me awake to not only the corruption and sinster nature of these people but to darker threads underneath. Saturn worship, paedophilia, the cults of death and their practices. It lead me deep down into symbology, esoteric thought and study of ancient near east religions

2017-08-07 18:50:03 UTC [4th Reich #general]  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/301107308618842113/344190470722813952/1502116880841.png

114 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2/2