well, ultimately, the optics debate is more than appearance. the ideas themselves are inherently toxic. there is no "respectable national socialism"

every post-ww2 interpretation of nazism has been total trash

and no one can possibly know what the actual movements were like back in the interwar period

so every intrepretation of NS is viewed through the skewed lens of contemporary views on the regime

Also, who runs this Heel Turn channel? the host is seemingly absent

whats bigger than the jq?

eh not necessarily

the ideology of liberalism is

liberalism is the greatest threat bc it is anti-identity

those who follow it are disarming themselves

liberalism enables the current conditions we are in. without it, other groups would not be a threat

it is the source of our oppression

other groups take advantage of the situation to their benefit

but they are only able to do so bc of liberalism

a tribal tactic? its explicitly anti-tribal

in liberalism, we see the primacy of the individual and the universalization of man. if you believe in the universal notion of 'man' and his/her interchangeability with any other man on the planet, you're a liberal. most europeans, especially americans, are liberals.

liberalism, particularly the american version of it, was born without jewish subversion

its become an abstract horror that is devouring us now

the founding fathers were not jews

they were something far worse

anglos

europe prior to the revolutions was not some totalitarian society. 17th century England was quite nice

do "rights of man" have to be explicitly stated and governance democratized to have a nice society?

part of liberalism is the belief in progress in the hegelian sense. neoliberalism/globalism/americanism is just part of the natural progression of liberalism

until their utopian goals have been achieved i.e. total destruction of all meaning in the world

slide into my dms

ok hot

i've read kmac, sunic, dugin, de benoist. i get the jq, believe me. however, we need global revolution against liberalism

when i use the term "liberalism" i am referring to liberals, progressives, libertarians, conservatives, etc

im not sure. tbh, supporting Ukrainian nationalism is to support the CIA and Zionists against Putin.

Azov is literally funded by Mossad and CIA

https://www.thenation.com/article/americas-collusion-with-neo-nazis/

If you like Azov, you like jews dicks in your butt

they're not malicious. they're opportunistic. the CIA & Mossad are looking for someone to back to fight against Russia

G E O P O L I T I C S

Don't forget the USA is backing them as well. That's worse than Israel backing them

there's probably more zionists in the usa than israel lol

american christians are rabid zionists

they are more zionist than most zionists

well all of western europe is essentially part of the american empire. its no surprise you see rainbows and mcdonalds golden arches there as well

Western Europe is occupied territory

they are a conquered people and being fed the american liberal toxin

basically, every country "gets along" with the USA or they possess WMDs or are the next hitlerist regime that must be stopped

thats how diplomatic relations work in the world

you're under the American boot or you're going to be facing down the barrel of an American rifle

but it is a globalist puppet

Zionists and Globalists often have overlapping interests when it comes to geopolitics

hence, all the wars in the middle east

How is Azov not a globalist puppet? the CIA was literally funding them

Yes lol

look at Chile now- its full of sodomites and McDonalds

Azov is cringe and blue pilled

most neo-nazis are

exactly so Azov is cringe and blue pilled

maybe if the CIA funded Jeff Schoep then he'd be the next president of the USA lol

consider the following: the CIA is shitty, our govt is evil and they will get in bed with anyone around the globe if it means scoring a geopolitical victory

Of course that is how Russia behaves. The real question is who do you side with: somewhat trad, somewhat nationalist Russia or globo-homo tranny jew dicks with big macs USA

Azov can form a giant brigade bc they got all that CIA-Mossad money.

USA just wants to use Azov to get a foothold in the region to prevent Russia and Europe from uniting to fight against globalism

these perfidious Russian oligarchs were those who sold out the Russian people following perestroika reforms

they sold out Russia to the West

yes, Putin is not backed by the oligarchs. they are not a monolith in Russia. Putin has played hardball with them

at the end of the day, you have to pick a side: USA or Russia. USA has made it explicitly clear they would like to destroy people like us. and the notion of us vs the world is fantasy

Yes, I live under the tyranny of oligarchs. That doesn't mean I should support them at all.

Just because we live in the USA doesn't mean we should want Zio-Globalists to be successful in their endeavors

in fact, I hope they fail

When Putin wins, Americans win, Globalists lose

perhaps not but I sure as hell am not siding with our hostile elites

they're backed by the CIA

theyre more than problematic

who cares?

Why should I support the Zio-Globalist agenda to topple regimes in Cuba and Nicaragua?

No Nicaraguan ever called me white trash

Cuba being Communist has literally no effect on your lives and theyre less than 100 miles from the USA border

you should be more concerned about our elites in Wall St and the Military-Industrial Complex

because in the real world, there are only 2 sides here: Russia and USA

I'm aware of what they say - I work for Arktos, we publish Dugin

more people in the alt right should read Dugin instead of GLR.

and the people in the alt right are sane?

GLR is trash

Yockey

Dugin is taken very seriously considering he wrote the geopolitical doctrine of Putin's Russia and is an oligarch targeted by the USA sanctions

Read Foundations of Geopolitics, see that it is read by the Russian military and see the global chessboard unfolding - Dugin is quite influential

Ukrainian nationalism should not be supported. It serves to create a larger wedge between the USA and Russia - a country we should have peace with. Russia could be a potential ally against China in the future.

well thats the future we are on

the world will be dominated by the Chinese

bc at the end of the day, USA will not be able to be militarily antagonistic towards Russia and China (a country that holds most US debt)

Russia and China are currently friends of convenience to counter American hegemony

Russia does not want to be dominated by China in the future

If USA and Russia do not ally then the world will be dominated by the Chinese. This proposal of US-Russia alliance is the only way Europeans hold on to their destiny at the global level

If we continue on our current path: US empire will continue to decline, Europe will fall into multicult chaos and Russia will be too weak to combat Chinese hegemony on their own.

well the share of bright Americans is decreasing slowly but surely over time

how? Why should the US empire stretch to Kiev?

from an isolationist pov, theres no reason for the USA to intervene in Ukraine

just like there was no reason for USA to go into Yugoslavia or Kosovo or Iraq or Libya

or Syria

Without US backing, there is no real Ukrainian nationalist movement and whatever does exist is not strong enough to stop Russia

but-t-t-t gommunismm is bad XDDD

China proves that authoritarianism is good

they're socialist