And obscenity was never considered speech until the 60s

However even dangerous ideas presented in a morally acceptable manner must be scrutinized

I believe in toleration not religious liberty. The difference is important.

Religious liberty is a deleterious principal. Toleration is often a necessity

Religious liberty is a refusal of the state to make certain claims about the truth

Toleration is necessary in societies which are in any degree mixed

Politically, religiously, even ethnically

@Thomas Ryan that all depends on the composition of the state. I don’t have a problem with compromises

Regardless: a state is always going to have a way of defining its sovereign good - from which it will be punishable to dissent. Our government very much does this as you all know. It isn’t called a state religion but you might as well think of it that way.

Genetically? Only partially true. Spiritually? Certainly not

Ashkenazis are shown to be between Europeans and middle eastern people genetically

Their distinctive features are real

Not only that but their features get perpetuated so much because they’re genetically isolated

Gud, about to lift

Greetings from (((DFW Airport))), goyim

Oh, body scanners for sure

Mohammedans everywhere

Oh, and happy All Saints’ Day

It’s alright I get to go to High Mass at one of the best churches in the country when I get there

^👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

Nice, congrats!

I like the changes 👌🏻

Ave Imperator!

O fugg