So if you read the whole thing you would have left it alone?

What?

So you Shoa'ed my image because it wasn't between the guidelines?

What violation is this?

No naughty examples?

Jesus you're really fearful.

Give me one sec.

I'm still lost.

You deleted a image with a few innuendos and you saw that violated a non-existent rule.

Which rule?

Give me it verbatim.

Source and all.

But it wasn't NSFW.

>9. BY USING THIS SERVER, YOU ARE CONFIRMING YOU ARE AT LEAST 14 YEARS OF AGE

>Saying no 14 year old has heard the word penis or vagina.

Why though?

It didn't have any nudity or violence.

>Graphic descriptions

Thats a real god scape goat.

"If you has bad words its a no-no for me."

No thanks.

Maybe a different night.

W-What?

You also said it violated the ToS of Discord but..

Also don't fall on mockery.

Be mature.

You said Discord guidelines.

Right?

But their isn't any guidelines saying this.

I did none of those things.

I think you just didn't like the image.

You keep posting these like it helps you but It doesn't since I didn't break a single rule.

I scanned through that image and only saw profanity.

Again, you keep posting these like it helps you but It doesn't since I didn't break a single rule.

You argument for me breaking the rules is flawed you see.

No it isn't my problem since you deleted the perfectly fine image.

How about I put it in shitposts?

I can do that whole George Carlin skit it did back in the early 90's and I would get muted because it had bad words you're saying?

Yup, work as a mover.

What a terrible example.

First, do I leave my name on this image?

And also no, because that would be quasi-vandalism.

Well you see, I wouldn't be fired from Discord.

hold on

Well on Discord I have almost complete anonymity.

And also Isn't this a "free-speech political server"? Where in by I can express my political stance on an issue or bring something to light without being restricted by non-existent guidelines?

Is that getting your noggin' joggin'?

Right but my image doesn't break a single guideline and you just removed because you didn't like it and your paranoid.

I did.

I said no, because I don't have the same privileges in real life that I do on the interwebs.

I also answered it with a question.

No.

This is the internet?

In 2019.

The image can also be shocking because of the animated chick on the side.

Also, if the sheet said "penis, fuck, n-word, etc." it would still be "NSFW"

Why don't you tell Phillip that since he showed the image of gibby threatening me. If would to show that to a person in a workspace and not on a **anonymous communication program** than what would that provoke?

See, you have privileges on the internet and ones in real life.

How about this

You're not good at debates it seems.

Private rules?

Thats sounds rather strange.

You're trying to do what Youtube does.

Have extremely vague rules and surprise people with new unwritten ones.

Right "Mr. mercenary man" but I didn't break a rule.

You're trying to use this very loaded hypothetical to back yourself up.

How about this.

Just stop typing for one second.

How about I put the image in <#507036970472570880>

Are you happy then?

Since you love logical fallacies so much lets just make my image almost irrelevant but still exist.

I get off your back?

I think your breaking rule .9

You must be 14 or older.

And if it's "NSFW"

Why don't you just make a "NSFW Channel"

>But it’s NSFW, the decision has already been made

But it isn't.

No it was decided by you, a half-ass moderator.

No, half of one.

You're not very good at reading something and understanding it the first time I see.

No, I've met better/

So wait,

You used an empty threat of muting me?

No you said early if I post that image again I would be mute but now you wouldn't have muted me?

You know what.

I'm gonna post that image in shitposts.

Wait a second!

There's images in there with JFK Holding funny signs.

That isint very safe for work.

That could offend someone.

And another insulting the reader.

And another of a video showing a man possibly murdering hundreds of innocent people.

Right but mine wasen't "lewd"

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/507036970472570880/551850227896942592/image0-18.png

That one.

I found in shitpost.

Mine is also implied.

Well lets read it.