https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gTRVKsBiSU

All the while being Dutch

We really are a bunch of swampgermans aren't we

https://youtu.be/yB2A9gxQZgw

When they tell you, a patriotic citizen of the US of A, that your place lacks diversity, but you look at the 7 different weapon calibers in your barn and get confused

And then you do another mass shooting lmao

https://youtu.be/t1LJUFmQ6L8

@Sterling Fuck off kike

no

Fun stuff, the JIDF's admin email actually leads to a delivery error when someone sends something to it.

Imagine being so disgusting that you have to do stuff like that

You parasites really are disgusting

imagine a red pill server that allows jews and doesn't ban them right away now look at this server

Imagine being so butthurt that someone putting "Jew" in their name instantly draws the attention of every edgelord within the radius of seven miles.

Why is that your name

you're either a kike or a fag

neither should be in this server

Because that's exactly the kind of reaction I expected when putting this name and it's hilarious.

so you're a baiting fag and you should be kicked

All I had to do was being quiet, actually.

case closed

Not really, this would not have happened if the nickname was just dismissed as casual shitposting.

But lo and behold, there always needs to be a shitstorm over something ordinary.

nah you're response makes it easy to see your name isn't a shitpost

"Imagine being so butthurt that someone putting "Jew" in their name instantly draws the attention of every edgelord within the radius of seven miles."

What, am I supposed to take that you're actually a fat fuck?

you're actually a jew or you're a baiting fag

yes

fat nigga gang

Well, it's a fitting name, that's for sure.

i'm only changing my name when i lose enough weight to be considered normal

What about this guy called Rabbi Shlomo Shoahstein, why haven't I seen anyone making a fuss over his name?

your name doesn't matter the way you talk does

your name isn't a meme

Imagine being so butthurt that someone putting "Jew" in their name instantly draws the attention of every edgelord within the radius of seven miles.

Actually, I was pinged and pestered because of my name.

Before that, I was completely quiet.

what's your political view then?

Depending on the country, it varies. For mine, I support an unnamed integration between faith, technology and the ideas of previously used Fascist systems. Oswald Mosley and Plínio Salgado, for example.

what country is that?

Mosley did not inherently oppose Jews for being Jews, but because they were being assholes. Salgado rejected the idea of an ethnostate in his country because he knew the population would not support it.

The best exporter of gore, coffee and B U N D A in all South America.

so you're a "some jews are okay!" cuck and a "some based black guys are okay!" cuck i gotcha

This is the part where I say "Brazil", you make some snarky overused comment on me obviously being a monkey nigger and I just chuckle because I heard that way too much already.

If that's your definition of "cuck", I guess I could be called that, yeah.

I dislike people for the beliefs they hold. The rest is often hardly relevant to me.

turbo autism

Every argument I have heard so far from anyone on why not instantly hating non-whites was pure emotional autism, funnily enough.

it's called tribalism

Oh right, that thing teenage whores do in high school.

what?

Little piece of very wise advice: loving your people isn't the same as hating everyone that isn't them.

true

it's excluding them

being okay with niggers and kikes is not okay

And that's perfectly fine if the environment supports it.

what?

My environment does not support the kind of mentality where "niggers" and "kikes" are excluded, because nobody here actually gives a shit about it.

We don't like corruption, we don't like commies, that's enough for me to go by.

So you don't mind your people being subverted

I do, naturally.

Maybe you dont care but i do

I believe anyone that isn't a complete fucking retard would dislike to see their own people being subverted.

"because nobody here actually gives a shit about it."

already subverted

Hardly. That's merely not caring about something that does not concern us in our environment.

@Fat Nigga 86 once you'll get to know this guy, you'll realize that everything he does is a shitpost. Relax.

lol

Shitposting is a way of life.

indeed, and you've mastered it

Sterling Shapiro ABSOLUTELY DESTROYS the LIBERAL AGENDA of the SOCIAL JUSTICE train

gone sexual

"if there are more than two genders what does the word transgender actually mean"

finna dabbed on them coloured hair niggas

#mypresident

somebody needs to farm more iq points

https://downloadmoreiq.com

Ben Shapiro absolutely OBLITERATES this Palestinian children's hospital - "Artillery doesn't care about your feelings, now give me money"
Dumb Palestinian terrorists were probably liberals
250mm rocket batteries only care about facts

Bet them fucking Muslims can't stop a bullet from a glorious IWI Tavor with their shield thoughts and prayers

google at its finest

Wish I could use that in court

"Did you burn that car down, yes or no?"

"Rather not say, Your Honor."

rather not say is a better option than different

@Sterling the point was the text under the "rather not say"

"add customised gender"

China is doing to its citizens exactly what Silicon Valley (big social and internet services) and Payment services , and big corporations are doing to those on the political far right in the USA
https://www.businessinsider.com/china-social-credit-system-punishments-and-rewards-explained-2018-4#5-keeping-you-out-of-the-best-hotels-5

But I like it where it is.

China's social credit is one of those interesting ideas with a shitty execution.

Define "racial realist".

So a person with a functional brain.

Who says I do?

A corporative society formed around meritocracy and moral values, exercising the responsible use of technology and the indifference towards race on an emotional level.

It sure is.

People will go to great lengths to destroy any of those things.

The meritocracy would result in its function being performed.

A nation has a common goal of the country's well-being.

If it's so inevitable, so be it.

The result will show the truth.

People who refuse it will be shunned as idiots.

Then we will never achieve a desirable society.

Even though there is a first time for everything.

That is a bold statement, for someone who clearly does not have a magical crystal ball.

So because of people who are also part of the country.

Shocking.

Until you drop it in a zero-G chamber.

Yes, I did the marvelous stunt of going in a dark corner of a bad part of town.

I didn't really care. Still don't.

On the greatest part, yes.

That is something I would certainly appreciate knowing.

Although it would not change my view of anything, so I don't really care about it either. My ancestors don't really matter to me, since they're dead and have no actual input on my life or my future.

Well, with the exception of my mother and father, "gladly".

Either way, it's a bit of a losing game with any answer given to the question. "Yes" leads to something talking about Jewish nature of manipulation. "No" leads to something talking about me being a traitor to my own race for not instantly wanting everyone else dead.

I have been called a "kike" way too much by edgy kids barely old enough to understand a quadratic function. At this point, better safe than sorry, specially after yesterday's lovely experience.

And a "nigger" too. Actually, I've expanded my insult vocabulary quite a bit in the past two years.

Yeah, I was actually impressed by the two of us sustaining a civil conversation, despite conflicting views.

You're not Portuguese, are you? I honestly can barely understand the way they talk.

You're an Angolan engineer, then.

Ooooooh, Argentina.

Nice.

Okay, this time the guess works.

Uh... Brazil.

Shit, sometimes I wonder how I'm able to guess such things, I think I have a hidden power or something.

Now I look schizophrenic.

what the fuck man

were you actually talking to someone or what

Yeah.

https://youtu.be/q3kpG72pMhc

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

https://youtu.be/MGz0vK-0LyM

https://discord.gg/twSHWNY

https://discord.gg/s6yQhhA

sounds based

>cp

😒

What did he mean by cp?

I've heard that in another way which is very wrong

@Deleted User *hot

@Deleted User dudeeee

😂

Jewing intensifies https://www.rt.com/news/439100-kosovo-israel-embassy-jerusalem/

Diversity always means less white males:
https://youtu.be/KLlpnjNV1oI

Invotes are open again check must read

https://youtu.be/WMl16Zhz0k8

How are we all doing this wonderful cold morning?

I am waiting for the universe to catch up and leave me drowning in the pool of my own misery

he'll yeah

https://youtu.be/xxnOKOSe4zE
https://youtu.be/rDGlzaYaPso
https://youtu.be/f5qEi0oFnhE
https://youtu.be/wXN5EW-hZpQ
https://youtu.be/br2ImcwabjQ

https://discord.gg/twSHWNY

MARS GANG WAS HERE!

Non-heterosexual teachers are coming for your children and your religion, study proves. https://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/lgbt-applicants-view-teaching-as-vehicle-for-change-460675.html

Where does it prove that, though?

Maybe the worse take away is that there are so many "non-heterosexuals" in our classrooms

at all

https://www.facebook.com/bbcmanchester/videos/primary-school-teaches-pupils-about-lgbt-relationships/530426800704457/

I don't see anything like the first picture in the article you linked.

The danger is not having non-heteros in a classroom, the danger is having them force LGBT propaganda down kid's throats.

You didnt read it

Non-heteros seek to change sociology and religion - why are you denying that?

Fundementally Non-heteros arent having children

Pedophilia is how homosexuals replicate, grooming

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=kOB8NcSLv_Y

I read it at least three times back and forth and couldn't find something that proved your statement, so could you please point it to me in the article?

Also, pedophilia and homosexuality are different things (although that part you know) and it doesn't necessarily involve children of the opposite sex. I'd also believe that a homosexual pedophile (now that's something for the stories) would prefer little boys over little girls.

I'm not really denying anything yet, just questioning.

The article is based on a study.

How old are you?

A study that was not linked along with it.

And in those times that I looked through the article, I also didn't find a link to said study.

Thus it doesnt exist?

In honor of Millennial Woes to which Twitter banned today, a favorite speech:

"One Hour From Now"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIu-GTSqBKM

Wow.

I'm not even gonna bother continuing, honestly. You're just faking ignorance at this point.

"its not in LINKED in the article.....waaa"

Fine with me

@Sterling
Here's the study it was likely referring to, you are correct, it was not linked

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02607476.2017.1251103?journalCode=cjet20

Thank you, at least you understood what I was asking for.

Wait, @Deleted User It wasnt linked.....how on EARTH did you find it?

Finally someone with two braincells to rub together

It's bad journalism to bot cite sources
I looked it up
On a search engine

Not

Welcome to google.

If it was a broader topic, or a larger organization, it could've been much harder to find, but it's a small institute it seems

@Deleted User Dude, the time you spent dodging me asking for the article could have been used to actually link me the article and make a coffee. You even had a screenshot of it, how else do you get that if not from the article itself?

I spent no time on you.

Ouch, that edge just sliced my arm apart like a chainsaw.

You're lazy

You made the claim that a study proved it and dodged my request for said study.

Whatever, that naïveté is your problem, not mine. Just trying to give you a heads up.

You want edge? How about this one: Homosexuals are mentally ill people and should either seek treatment or be executed if they ever acted upon it.

That's like based Nippon steel folded over 1000 times.

There's more: Their bodies shouldn't be harvested for organs, as they are stained with immorality.

Are you passing out yet

I'm bleeding out here, it's slicing my body apart slash after slash.

My interest was not in the study, but in you providing all the information necessary without people having to ask.

When someone says "a study said X", they show the study.

Your interest was in getting me to do something for you. You failed.

so you whined.

Are you seriously going to play ignorant on this one too?

Man, you're a total fucking child.

40% to 60% of serial killers are homosexuals. Source: http://takimag.com/article/the_straight_dope_on_homosexuality_elizabeth_mccaw/print

There's more where that came from, I'll post it in SCIENCE

Hm, I don't think that deserves a snarky comment or a sarcastic remark. Thanks for posting the source this time.

Claims that gay parents are just as capable of raising children as straight parents are misrepresented. Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657413

Go to <#373860833475690508> for more

You do know that just putting yourself on a fake high horse after a small discussion is pretty cringy, right?

Its not fake.

Really? So you're genuinely above than me as a human being because you refused a simple request and escalated it to straw man and petty insulting?

Impressive, you are truly deserving of that horse.

Correction, you didn't refuse it. You actively dodged it.

Alright, enough of that, boys.

How do you find the tons of sources regarding homosexuals and their deleterious behaviour?

I know a guy

Yes, Really.

No, I mean

How do you find = what do you think of it

My question was directed at @Sterling

I haven't checked them, honestly.

I have no interest in them at the time, and I'd rather not force myself to read something I'm not interested in.

I'll just tell you, most people odnt know, because in most cities there isnt a large fag population, but if you've lived in a large enough city they have develop a large sub-culture, and you meet them and they talk about - it just makes you understand how disgusting their behavior is. All of those studies understate how maliciously dangerous they are.

They dont care, they want to die, they want to destroy, they want to get aids, they want to just be disgusting

You should educate yourself beyond matters that appeal to you. You'll never grow much that way.

While having the best nails.

and prettiest hair cuts and bodies

its the psychology

Read the articles, lad.

Read them.

Knowledge retention is awful when it comes to a subject that the person is not interested in.

gross on the inside to they present and pristine as possible on the outside.

I'll forget them the next day.

Bullwhip theres a thing called burden of proof

If you make a claim you have to provide evidence and the sources

When your claim is challenged

And consodering you jad easier access and knowledge of an article you could have been kind to provide it in the forst place. I see its all resolved now anyways, thanks mr squeaky for providing it.

Kudos to you

>provide then dozens of proofs
>lmao i wont read them ill just forget tomorrow anywayz xD

I'm starting to think I speak some kind of extremely advanced English that only I comprehend.

I didn't want proofs for anything. I wanted him to provide the study that confirmed his statement and to understand why it's done.

It's not quantum physics or anything overly complex.

Just "provide everything that supports your statement without people needing to ask for it".

Say a person claims vaccines cause autism. They just do that, and pull the "just search it lmao" card when someone asks for the article or study they read to reach this conclusion.

How many articles on this subject are there? How do I know which one was the one he looked at?

Besides that, it's etiquette.