The Republicans are right to abolish the estate tax. It’s an incredibly inefficient tax that generates negligible revenue. The only justification for it is “spoiled rich kids don’t deserve money they didn’t earn.” Which is sorta true, but it’s also true about all windfall gains (lottery, striking oil on your property, etc.)

We need less gun control not more

They’re infringing on my rights already

Those fuckers

NFA GO AWAY

Those Jewish cucks and their gun control

heres how you fix gun control

one, remove literally all the gun control laws and replace them with a very basic list of prohibited persons

two, solve the actual causes of crime

Guns don’t kill people

I kill people

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xC03hmS1Brk

Classic

i miss 2009

When memes were dreams

oh man I'm always happy when I get reminded of Jon Lajoie

show me your genitals

E=MC vagina

I can't put my fist in your college degree

i cant put my dick in your personality

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4HEchh0XD8

steven crowder interviews the good guy with a gun

He used an AR-15 to stop the shooter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy ...that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

What a fucking great idea amirite?

AR-15? I get that the guy stopped the shooting but he could’ve destroyed an entire city block

it sounds like communism with extra steps

Normal citizens shouldn’t have RPGs

AK 15s were used in Vietnam to burn down jungles correct?

@DanConway exactly

it's essentially part of a revolutionary utopian vision

Now they're saying it might have been some sort of intra-family feud

The craziest part is that this strategy was actually implemented to some degree beginning in 66

the new deal

it all goes back to FDR

the idea that ypu can "create jobs" started with his policy

I'm just talking about the notion of intentionally causing crisis within governmental organizations.

specifically the welfare system

thats what i mean it all started with FDR era

the original progressives

well damn, not sure what you mean but I'm very interested

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal

"The New Deal produced a political realignment, making the Democratic Party the majority (as well as the party that held the White House for seven out of the nine Presidential terms from 1933-69). With its base in liberal ideas, the South, traditional Democrats, big city machines, and the newly empowered labor unions and ethnic minorities. The Republicans were split, with conservatives opposing the entire New Deal as an alleged enemy of business and growth, and liberals accepting some of it and promising to make it more efficient."

I'm wondering what aspect of the new deal was intended to generate crisis, or if you're saying it did regardless of intention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102

it all started with FDR

Seems like a suspicious rationale, that's for sure.

"stalling economic growth" especially

im trying to figure out if the problem started with FDR

or if it was Theodore Roosevelt that was the real problem

he expanded the federal ownership of land in the US

Oh sweet god my forex portfolio is finally going back up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW51iM0hW78

Or maybe it's all George Washington's fault

Or maybe...

https://www.tenor.co/yHGu.gif

what the fuck am I looking at 😒

pure ideology

the funny part will be none of them are even working class

Louder with crowder. Lol

Why’d you even watch that shit

Crowder's alright

Not really.

Some of it. Maybe. But overall. No

He made a good point about gun control which I have seenplay out very much with my own family which is that many people just think guns look scary even though they have no problems with carbines.

Obviously thats not every gun control advocate, but I see it all to often to be ignored

aside from that and amy schumer

I haven't seen much from him

And I'm talking about guns that are the same as carbines except for the mechanism that reloads it is different, but have a bout the same fire rate.

He plays too much into party politics. He’s literally mainstream media but indie

He is much more credible than most MSM

He is definitely a conservative

Low bar.

Whatever

I respect his style

He tries to come with facts to support his arguments and seems legitimately open to other ideas

His bias is there, but he doesn't try to hide it or lie about it

A self serving conservative though. He doesn’t seem as interested in improving his own group as much as just discredit the other one

He presents a very reasonable conservative position

Well there is a lot to criticize idk

I haven't found a more insightful conservative voice

Though I need to look more into Ben Shapiro

I prefer Ben Shapiro, although I'm not a huge fan, but he makes good arguments, especially against SJWs.

Self critique is important if you want genuine improvement.

I'm not even looking for someone I strongly agree with

Just people with some intellectual rigor and curiosity

And different perspectives

I know we’re on sargons discord but he’s not much better

Who passes your bar then?

In the English media? Genuinely. No one person.

No one worth watching?

No one is interested in actual politics. More afraid of the big bad sjw. Meanwhile the nhs is being sold off to private investors and whatnot.

You can watch who you want but barely anyone touches on anything valuable and if they do. Generally it plays into party politics

Trying to find ideologically pure people to watch is a fruitless endeavor

Well I'm American

It isn't about finding someone who agrees with you totally it's finding rational people and comparing their arguments and coming to your own conclusions

And I find party politics fascinating if frustrating

If you take someone else's opinion as holy writ you're no better than the normies

Sargons the closest to me I've found and even I disagree with him regularly

I never said there's no strain. But in party politics facts are generally thrown out of the windows in favour of "I prefer this"
You get MORE strain the more parties you have with different solutions to a problem.
But as long as people agree on the facts you can then decide if you care about them or not.

And I don't ask people to be ideologically pure, but rather just be honest about the problems at hand and the decisions that needs to be made.
People are so afraid to make their own side look weak they end up conjuring lies to cover it.

How is Sargon dishonest?

I don't know where you got that word from.

>but rather just be honest about the problems at hand

And earlier you implied Sargon wasn't much better

So what's he wrong on, to you?

As mentioned earlier. Most "political" youtubers avoid actual politics.
I implied Sargon avoids real daily politics in favour of talking about some moronic blogger. Which is fine, but it's doing little on the political debate.
I never said Sargon was dishonest. From what I've noted (albeit I don't watch ALL of his stuff) he generally seems to cover the material properly when something is brought up, but he has to handpick the few things he wants to talk about.

The disbenefit of not being a major network, you can't cover everything. So it's fair. I just think he priotises things incorrectly.

Indeed

You’ll notice he uses twis to show contempt of the subject. It’s amusing but ultimately ineffective

His long form videos? Definitely interesting

TWIS does bore me a bit lately

Um, this week in stupid is literally supposed to be the stupid stuff

It's largely an attack on the media, not politics

Radeon.

When you suck his dick, do you say thanks when you are done?

Did y'all miss the multi-hour-long political debates on his second channel?

I really like his conversations with other creators

I love this, coming to sargons discord and spouting ad hominem about supporting Sargon 👌

You’re so quick to defend him. Let a man be imperfect, you iconoclast

I literally just said 5 mins ago I disagree with him regularly

The defense is perfectly understandable

😏

Sargon is interesting

But how does it taste?

Also just because one largely agrees with another doesn't mean the original statements aren't true

@DanielKO You referring to Sargon's cock or his ass?

Deadly sucking Sargoy's dick now

*agreeing with other people? Wow what a normie*

Shit I love me some sausage

Sargon x thatguyt fanfic when

Big and thick black dick. Thankfully, Sargon’s black so I’m good

But no, in all honesty. Sargon's main channel is largely irrelevant on the political front.
There's a video every now and then that touches on topics but a fat majority of it is just "Bleh". Such as SJW, feminists etc.

Yup

Because Sargon isn't explicitly a political YouTuber. You're complaining because he's not meeting your imaginary criteria.

Okay, he did start out with cultural and media criticism

Maybe his watchers enjoy seeing culture warriors get btfo'ed?

That feel when coach red-pill is turning out to be right

He literally started his channel over gamergate

Yeah, masturbation is fun, but useless

Yo, if you're watching his channel to see SJWs and feminists get slam dunked, you do you.
But don't come and try to claim it as some kind of political insight. (Which some people do)

Masturbation is very useful

After a while, there isn't much new. Specially if you follow other channels that beat him to the punch.

C o r r e c t

Intersectionalists is a growing threat on the social front of things. I'm glad to see it being attacked.

How many videos about "It's Okay to be White" can you watch?

Several

It needs more specific attack

Okay.
But do they have any seats in parliament?

Social, not political my dude

Sargon hasn’t released a fucking reading list

It depends on the perspective providing something new

Effectively? Several, given the rise of sjws in parliment

There’s no serious difference between social and political fronts

Sure.
If you're just interested in fighting a social war and not a political one that's fine.

Adorable

A lot of the problem currently is defining political philosophy

They are one in the same.

Marxism must be defeated be it social or political.

So

We are not partisans so it's often more difficult to know how to fight political battles

You are contradicting your defense

Sargon is criticizing irrelevance

?

You've yet to explain how the ideologicalend take over of the west is irrelevant

No

Are you genuinely stupid?

Aydin Paladin made an hour long video on it. I didn't even click on it. Then Bearing made another. Then Count Dankula. What else can they add? They can't.

Ad hominem me more daddy

Well they can't add anything if you don't pay attention

The fire department who got a huge paycheck cut and then handed out a "inflation adjustment" which took into account fuck all when she said there's no money tree (Theresa May)
Despite pulling the money tree on to give MPs a pay rise.

See that's political.
That affects people.
I don't think those firemen cares what some edgy kid says on a uni ground.

I'm not much for memey pwnage type channels anyway

They will when that edgy kid torches their car

Canada and the UK have both criminalized criticism of Islam in a continent where terror attacks are now weekly, that's not relevant?

Discussing the real world political changes that occur as a result of intersectionalSocial justice matters. The Ass drippings of legacy media do not

That's relevant but is largely detatched from SJWs and feminists.

And I know that statement sounds like I'm implying Canada and the UK share a comtinent

Legacy media is a huge issue

There is a crisis of trust in journalism

Obviously

Feeding many of the problems we face today and in the future

SJWs and Islam appalogia have the same ideological basis, intersectionality

Legacy media is an issue when not handled properly. It's not a global issue. It's an issue in english speaking countries.

Find me someone who *doesnt* know

The public knows

It’s a meme now

Muh fake news

By English speaking I of course mean majority english. Not Europe as a whole. England, Australia, US, Canada etc.

The public knows less than you might think

I’m skeptical of that assertion

Most people still rely on a single source of news

Most normies I've met consider MSM good enough

You mean Boomers?

Millenials too

Ach... mama mia

For instance, if you recall the recent shooting at the republican party charity baseball team practice in Alexandria, MSM initially reported the shooter used an AR15 or an M4 assault rifle, and long after people regurgitated this information even though it was factually untrue

Hm.

Aye

The shooter had a Soviet era SKS

But did it have a silencer though?

Until there is a solid chain of trust in journalism, the media must be continually attacked

Ironically the ban some politicians would later propose wouldn't have banned the SKS 😬

Hmm

Fair points

I would like to see people get more in depth in political analysis, but I recognize it takes a lot of work

There's dozens of cases like this, the media makes the narrative

It’s not just that

It’s the duplicity

Outside MSM leftists still have really strong corporate "new" factions that are hugely impactful

There is no alternative for normies they simply do not care enough to fact check their news

Indeed

Laziness is degenerate

most people out in aus havent heard of antifa unless its through some shit like vice or the guardian, in which case "good on em"

For instance CNN has reported Sam Hyde to have conducted his fifth mass shooting

loool

They didn't even bother googling him.

Hmm

They could have said it was hulk Hogan and probably get away with it

It's so incredibly lazy

What’s the primary motivation to Donaldo Trumpo’s voter population?

This is why everything think Trump literally runs the KKK, they only get their news from one source

Great Golden Man, within the house of white

saw an article spouting tim pool as the leader of antifa, and Big Man Tyrone as the leader of kekistan an "alt right haven"

Trump is a reaction to the corporate oligarchy that makes up "the establishment"

Yes

This is why they hate him so much

the power of the narrative to completely disintegrate any form of real journalism is insane

If he can get the 13th amendment fixed we have a serious chance of making this country great

Eliminating corporate personhood

This and double this

Fuck corporatism

It's not capitalism it's oligarchy

Yes yes

Look at us

Agreeing and shit.

What a bunch of fucking fags we are; being cordial and friendly

is it in motion? sorry outsider to the US, havent heard about this before

We need more shit flinging

Obama did 9/11

Fuck you

Gas the kikes race war now

Cantaloupe

Eat a burrito you fat hispanic

Si senor

@goustermix Maybe. Trump’s hand picking Supreme Court Judges

@BrianBoru The most recent paradise papers was leaked through "legacy media". Food for thought (German, mind you)

???