politics-free-for-all
Discord ID: 372513679964635138
182,758 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 61/732
| Next
not that exact picture but you get what I mean
kek I agree
oy vey
posted already
ah
well
that would be 1/3 of total members
so entritysm is a sucsess
It's not true
It's not that far off 10k but that stat isn't true
ben looks young af in that first part
he is so god damn funny
yes itis big lol
Damn, she got em good.
Ben Shapiro eternally BTFO
Are beein ironic @Thomas the Sowell Train [USA] ?
this reads like a prody
She tried to pull a Colbert shtick. Colbert Report era.
Just too slow paced though.
not enough "live studio audience"
The Alt-Right likes Ben <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>
haha She's hilarious
The second half of this actually sounded like the sort of things that Ashton Birdie is now saying about Ben
I unsubbed from Ashton, she was sperging too much about Ben criticizing Trump.
I don't think I had ever subbed, but I knew who she was
It was weird seeing her go from what she was posting last year to what she's acting like nowadays
It's like she's a parody of herself
๐ซ
I can't stand her voice
@DanielKO Yeah since that I haven't been watching her. Couldn't even finish that video... the cringe was strong.
Let Trump get feedback. I think Shapiro's reasons are justifiable.
I mean, I think she's right in some sense, that is Ben does have some weak criticism of Trump sometimes but man oh man she was spergin out hard.
It was about jumping in to back up any celebrity that supports Trump. Ben was right, just because they're celebrities, it doesn't make them intelligent or flawless. Eventually one of them will do or say something really embarrassing, and all that unconditional admiration for the celebrity will backfire.
Right and it's fair to say that simply being a celebrity doesn't give their political commentary any credence. However, Ben seemed to push into the area of assuming that *because* they are a celebrity, their political commentary has no credence. I was annoyed both with Ben and Ashton on that point.
IMO, if a celebrity does something right, why can't we applaud it? Sure, it's fair to point out that doing something right doesn't make you a beautiful, flawless poster child, but I thought Ben was harsh, so I can understand Ashton's reaction, but it was still coocoo.
That video she made *was* trash, though
I agree.
"liek omg can u belieeeeeef I used to listen to him!?!?!?"
"KIM KARDASHIAN IS GETTING THINGS DONE"
'getting things done' is not a good thing in of itself
well I think that part is implied
Ed Gein got things done
If a celebrity were praising Obama, Clinton, and insulting Trump, Republicans would immediately just say "so what, it's just a dumb celebrity saying dumb things." I get it that he was being consistent, and telling fellow conservatives shouldn't be parading celebs around like war trophies. If the celebrity wants to become politically engaged, you welcome them, but don't go as far as bragging or lying about it.
Thats the one of the things that Ben Shapiro gets unnecessary flak for
He doesnโt believe that parading celebrities is a good idea. You live by the Kanye you die by the Kanye.
Sadly the other side has no such consistancy
>leftists
>consistancy
lol
>If it wasn't for their double standards, they'd have no standards.
Trump derangement syndrome is strong on twitter last couple days
TDS is strong everyday
If yall want a good laugh, this speech is highly entertaining https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQIpMMKpGQI
yea twitter is exploding on immigration rn. So much misinformation.
honestly it's one of his better speeches
He's such an entertainer.
A disabled [legless] marine vet almost had his life ruined because he works for ICE and has the scateboaring tats. But they cried Nazi
Hes a business man.
I'm very impressed with Trump's speeches. It actually comes as a surprise to me considering I used to be someone who bought into the blue pill.
That's one gripe I have with Ben, all he has to say about Trump's rhetoric is blue pill crap.
And I get it, yeah he says crazy stuff and his rhetoric has an effect that hasn't always right but what his rhetoric *has* accomplished?!
***DAMN*** DONNY!!
The thing with trump. You have to dig below the shomanship
And follow that with his actions
Rhetoric means nothing if your actions betray you. Like Obama
I've said it and I'll keep saying it, people need to appreciate not just when he talks shit. He has had numerous speeches where he literally listed off people who were doing good. He *always* points people out in every speech who are doing a good job and schmoozes em, but not just that, he sorts the wheat from the chaff.
It's not as though he spends a disproportionate time being a critic towards the DNC and the fake news (who are really his only targets (not the fags or the blacks or any of that shit)), he spends easily as much time thanking people and letting everyone know just who it is and what they're getting done.
True.
TBH those are defensive battles for him as well the otherside shot the first roun lol
You know when I said it was one of his better speeches I didn't mean to say the other ones are bad.
Most of them are good.
USA has quid the UK human rights council
UN not UK
For good reasons
Isreal aside. The members are some of the worst human rights abusers. China, Cuba, Venezuela. And these countries would shoot illigal immigrants in and out of their borders...But the coubcel decided to bring up US Immigration. So that was the last straw. To be honest, we didnt even join the council until Obama.
Even Bush knew the councel was a farse
@UKEEP๐ท W. Bush did this as well
@Ctrlaltlama Bush never left. It was created duribg Bush's first term and he never joined. He saw the farse for what it wast. Obama jumped on cause his muslim homies were on it
"Intel classified an email from Loretta Lynch so much that unscrewing it so Congress can see the bare minimum requires higher levels of authority" - Basically
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki thanks for the correction
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhQQtU8IvLk Surprised to see a lot of antagonism in the comments. I guess Dave will always have has pathetic haters.
I can confirm application was received and accepted in regards to Sargon. The membership sign up process does not enforce them to disclose alter online identies or their online profiles. Vetting will take place obviously to go through their profiles no exceptions will be made if he has posted blatantly racist comments using derogatory language (I think we can call identify real racism not the distorted new leftist version). If anybody would like to raise a formal complaint about a new or any members online content they can download fill in and send official complaint forms from MyUKIP.
I love that one word you aay offhanded years ago could ban you from a party...
@UKEEP๐ท so sargon is in?
Seems so
Apparently so yes
Unless ukip finds some blatant, unironic racisn
which is fair I suppose
Yeah we have to be careful and of course blatant racism or anything similar will be a legit offence and you will be kicked but if it's an out of context word you used then the chances of you being kicked out is slim
I mean look at count. If we were to kick sargon out then we would have to do so with count
I can agree with not wanting racists
asp if your party's schtick is UK independence
you'll have some trynna get in I assume
Oh we've had many
Out party was plagued with them but thankfully they left for parties like for Britain
Hopefully it remains that way
yannow there's one thing sargon has said that I hold real true for multiethnic countries and areas
the bants strengthen bonds between groups ans nobody should be safe
if bants offend you you need to reevaluate your faith in your identity
I'm squishy and I'm not always in the miod for canada to be ripped on but it has to be because protected classes suck
It's not even that were trynna keep things fair and equal. The uk is actively trynna push immigrants rights over our own. We're expected to have a refugee quota as it's our 'duty' as immigrants have more sway in claiming benefits, houses, jobs etc to integrate them as a functioning member of british life but it's not working
if they're here they gotta accept that they might get offended
Yep
I feel for their widdle hearts but come the fuck on
Oh, something someone in another serv said
Wait what?
provicial elections are goin round
trudeau just lost majority in quebec
Hahahhahahahhaha
trudeau is the biggest cuck
but srsly qhat kyoto saidin that screengrab
Quebec gets special Frenchie treatment
and keeps wantint to ceceede
Links to any info?
trudeau is liberal party btw
Is that like, a primary?
we don't have a 1:1 election to america
And I'm bad at describing it
we vote for parties not candidates basically
there are seperate elections for who becomes leader of the parties in certain provinces
it's more like how thr uk doesnit jirc
I get that
But isnโt the election in October?
provincially may be? wr just had our municipals
I misspoke earlier
>voting for parties
gay as fuck
>voting for parties
Only way not to throw away your vote
>voting for UKIP
Make Britain great again
That fat fuck have to lie his ass off
Jesus fuck
Eat a dick Ralph
no shit
like I said, theralphretard
Figured
For real, dude have to stop acting like a kid
ralph?
he can't
Luckily he's not allowed to own a gun
@Deleted User
Yeah, i know that
His membership card is really different to mine. Mine is all white and an older logo obviously because we've changed back recently.
I kinda like mine more tho. Looks cleaner
Do you guys ever think the that decline in religiousness in Europe is probably a reason for getting cucked
I think it's because they're socialist cucks
@aed22
Nope
Don't start it
@Deleted User
It's because Europe is extremely safe and good to live
Soft times = soft people
That's why you don't see the same shit in eastern Europe
But they're kinda religious and have their family structure intact
and why is that?
Estonia isnt
Yeah, that's definitely the only reason
Hmm
It's not because poorer people tend to be more religious
czech republic isnt
Hungary is mostly calm
Only Poland had a big spiritual revival
I was watching this
It's remote right wing opinions in india
Mainstream is heavily left focued
True
ALright my laptop is up
Your MacBook pro
Nah it's some HP POS I bought last summer in case my desktop crashed (which it did, and I knew it was coming)
the new PC should be in and put together by middle o next month
I didn't have the money last year for a new PC so I figured i'd buy a POS to tide me over once the big one crashed
yannow
```Trump's compromise on DACA, offering the opportunity for 1.8 million young (or youngish) people to stay in the country in exchange for a wall and a more regulated immigration system, was surprisingly generous. Many Republicans blanched. But the Democrats were having none of it. That would have put an end to this issue, at least for the nonce, and they would have lost their football.
So instead we have a fiesta of hypocrisy with one supposed genius who once ran the CIA comparing what's going on on our border to Auschwitz (how anti-Semitic is that!) and the Mexican government, which treats immigrants somewhere south of lepers and has vicious controls on its Guatemalan border, jumping in to condemn the U.S. treatment of these children.```
now I'm gonna have to go check this movie of his out
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1554091/
7.2
Yea. Trump just caved a little. He signed an Executive order to stop the practive and hung it all on the Dems for not wanting to change the law
Meanwhile during thia qhole smokescreen ignored was the congressional hearing with the IG
I really hate
..let's call it 'executive discretion'
Enforce the laws that are on the books *f o r e v e r y o n e* or get the *legislative branch* to *c h a n g e t h e l a w s* and you can sign off on them
I do too
Do they still teach civics in the US?
Honestly they should teach civics in other countries too, but that's besides the point
People are like *supreme court gave prosecuters the right to pick and choose what they convict*
People act like the executive branch doubles as the legislative branch, so no wonder people get so heated about whom is in the White House
Which is true. But not the right to choose the punishment
or interm
Then again, people in other countries think they get to elect whom their Prime Minister is <:thronk:441701565607444482>
Its thanks to Obama legeslating from the White House
via executive order when congress said no
People think thats the norm now.
Which is Ironic cause the left thinks the Judicial has the power of making laws too
I think it goes much further back than Obama
Obama used EO the most of any president
Most of the Presidents around the 1910s-30s ran roughshod over congress with EO spam
lemme go see if I can..
*rummages*
yeah, FDR blows Obama out of the water
And Hoover
And Wilson
And Harding
And Coolidge
fuckin' hell
Well those are all dems lol
By a factor of *ten*
Coolidge and Hoover were Rs
So was Teddy
And he's up there too
Sorry I confused debt with eo. He ran up the most dept
right
*finds shiny infograph*
Look at FDR
good lord
twice as many as the next
Reading back on those times, both parties (or at least their Presidents) sound more like Obama in how they tried to consolidate power in the executive branch
*super*-disappointing
Pretty sure there was a really bad fissure in the Republicans because of this, too
@Reaps they still teach civics but it's only for 1/2 a school year
the other half is economics
Depends on the school
Teddy was grooming his VP to be next President but Taft had other ideas
```Taft sought reductions to trade tariffs, then a major source of governmental income, but the resulting bill was heavily influenced by special interests. His administration was filled with conflict between the conservative wing of the Republican Party, with which Taft often sympathized, and the progressive wing, toward which Roosevelt moved more and more```
"the *progressive wing*, toward which *Roosevelt* moved *more and more*"
Would you technically count any carry over EOs as their as well? Since they could end them.
That's why I find EOs so dumb in the first place
Anything that can be enacted with an EO can be rescinded by another EO
Like, *just stop fucking with shit*
EOs were meant for short term immidiate issues
Not to replace laws
"but the legislative branch is complex and takes too long!"
That's the fucking *point*, to prevent sweeping changes to law being enacted with a wave of a single person's arm because he thinks he knows better
^
that comment wasn't aimed at retorting your above comment, but nonetheless
Temperature is reaching a point where it's annoying to type
12 degrees C
That's like 50 F
Donโt like the cold?
๐ฆ๐บ
50F is perfectly nice weather
Itโs not cold enough to snow
182,758 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 61/732
| Next