politics-free-for-all
Discord ID: 372513679964635138
182,758 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 39/732
| Next
I think guns would have significantly altered the logistics and efficacy of arresting all the Jews.
How many knew they were going to die and did nothing?
Yes, Hitler could then put more effort into locking down cities for the purges, but how much more expensive would it be?
How many willing entered the trains?
Hoe many watched while the SS executed them in front of them?
The majority of the populace don't stand up and fight in either case; but when word gets around of mass killings and reprisals, that tends to have the opposite effect of making people docile; formerly cooperative citizens will do the bare minimum required of them, and only when under the supervision of the occupying forces. It's one of the many reasons German equipment got progressively worse as they were using citizens from occupied countries to build their own weapons of war, leading to numerous sabotaged weaponry rolling out of the factory and towards the front lines. Other citizens who don't 'stand up and fight' whom had family amongst the dead have a renewed reason to assist in any way they can, even if it's just relaying information to resistance fighters
Yeah, but how many actually did that?
It's a pretty small number, right?
The 1938 act ("Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons") came into effect *after* Kristallnacht
Look, who wanted to fight did, and died fighting
There is a lot of examples of that
what tism is going on here
Some of then had guns? Yeah, some don't
And they fought the same way
This wasn't a case of Hitler waking up one day and going 'time to get rid of the gunzzzzzzzzzz'
It was incremental over several years, dismantling the ability of his opponents to mount any effective opposition to him in *any* fashion
I get it
Still, people who wanted to fight
Did it
And people have a habit of denying the horror of what is happening, and delaying the inevitable
Some dude with a gun shows up at your door and tells you to get on a train
And you have no way to do anything about it
You get on the train
and hope for the best
The majority of people would do it
Reaps, the cold harsh truth is
The majority of the world population are just followers
Sheeps
Or whatever you want to call them
Most people don't have in them what it takes to stand up and fight for something
There are some that can acquire some fighting spirit? Yeah
Someone that saw an heroic act and decided to stand up against what's happening
But the majority of the population, will just lower their heads and move on with their lives
If, say, Venezuelans, had guns, would they tearing a cow to shreds to eat, or would they be on a shootout with the government?
You do not need even close to a majority of people to resist in order to make things incredibly difficult for an opposing force
@DanielKO
They don't have guns
Thus the "if".
And they are fighting the government
Guns are not hard to acquire, it's not today and it wasn't at that time
But they're not cheap either.
This just comes across as a dystopian argument. Anyhoo, it's 0500 now, so if y'all want to continue this, be my guest I guess ๐คท
Once you're already starving, it's too late to buy guns.
Sleep well dude
@DanielKO
LOL, it's a revolution
There is no such thing as buying guns
Lol
Do they just find them lying on the ground like in PUBG?
Funny, usually one has to get them from a weapons dealer.
No, they kill someone with a weapon
And get it from them
And as the polish partisan said
With one you get 2
With 2 you get 4
And you keep going
If, say, 1% of the population has guns, because the law makes it hard to legally own one, murdering somebody with a gun to take his gun, won't increase the total number of guns.
........
> Catching up about AR video on Nazi Gun Control
Does the Warsaw Uprising not get taught in schools anymore?
@Legiondude
Which video?
Haven't seen the video Reaps posted, but just skimming through the conversation on the channel in the past hour or so
I saw a part of that video, but I remember a German dude here saying there it won't mean much
Because they voted for Hitler
Did Hitler campaign with "and once I'm elected, I'll round up the Jews and kill them all"?
People elected Trump, but a lot of his supporters were fuming when he said "we'll take the guns first, and do due process later."
No, but he got elected, right?
Also, how much of the German population knew about what used to happen in the concentration camps?
Hiding shootouts with Jews could be harder to hide, specially if they had to escalate it with bringing in the military to safely overpower them.
If the jews fought, yeah
Which is why I said it would have changed the logistics (it would be more expensive) and optics (it would be very visible to the public.)
But If they just went passively
No
The thing is
Maybe it wouldn't have changed anything. Maybe the general population hated the Jews just as much as Hitler.
Stop seeing what happened from 2018
Most people didn't had an idea of what was going on
People didn't knew they would be gassed or shot
They Just knew they would be taken somewhere
I think you might be assuming too much, that they didn't resist when getting arrested, because they weren't willing to. When it could just as easily be because they didn't have the means anymore.
I think you are assuming too much
You want to see a better example? Europe from nowadays
People are getting shoved from left to right by the government
How many stand up and say something about what's happening?
They don't have the right to speak though. They already lost the means to say something.
>The very first official concentration camp to be opened was Dachau (March 22th, 1933). The opening of this concentration camp *was not secret: an official announcement was published in several Munich newspapers in the following days*.
@DanielKO
I said what was happening at the camp
Not about the camps
@DanielKO
They do have the right to speak, the government are not shutting their mouths, they can say whatever they want
And how many said something about it? How many Just lowered their heads and moved on with their lives?
HMMMM
๐ฆ
I mean, he's not wrong
yeah, he ain't
He's RIGHT. REEEEEE
He had been dividing the liberal and conservative mindset in an oversimplistic fashion.
He is absolutely sure liberalism comes from the trait of trying new stuffs.
So by nature liberals are more innovative and contribute to progress while conservatives mod these new stuffs for reliable use. So conservatives are better administrators.
I cannot emphasise more how wrong this analytics is at least on an individual level.
He doesn't derive these from the "conservative" and "liberal" labels. If you think that, you clearly never heard him talk about it. He bases his conclusion from the Big Five Personality Types.
```So, whatโs this case even about? Trump allegedly slept with Stormy Daniels back in 2006. Then Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 to keep quiet, according to Cohen himself. According to Cohen, Trump knew nothing about the payment. The settlement agreement contains pseudonyms for Trump and Daniels, and was funneled through an LLC. This could make Cohenโs payment to Daniels an in-kind contribution to the Trump campaign in violation of campaign finance law. Furthermore, if Trump knew about it, that could constitute criminal conspiracy to violate campaign finance law. Former Democratic presidential candidate and senator, John Edwards, was tried on precisely those grounds; a jury split on five counts and acquitted on a sixth before the DOJ decided to drop the case. ```
```Ironically, Trump could have avoided all of this by merely paying Daniels directly.```
interesting
can somebody who isn't the guardian or reddit explain to me the Trump-russia connection scandal investigation thing? Haven't heard anyone who doesn't have a leftist agenda talk about it. Whats going on? Has anything substantial been found?
It's bullshit
There you go
What the Ape said
Lol i just don't get this whole paranoia over russian bots
Like, even if they are spouting propagandistic half-truths and russian talking points, it doesn't justify banning them outright
on principle
Scape goats
They are trying to find a excuse for their mistakes and lack of competence
hmmm
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>
Russian press is a rogue player, both sides want them out of their sandbox.
but... but... RT is right wing propaganda... <:think_woke:378717098681171988>
/sarcasm
makes you think
They might be shitting on the left now, but they have no loyalty. Can't have that in America.
dunno, whenever I've seen a political RT story, it looks like a headline the guardian would run
not that i've studied it real intensely or anything
https://lawfareblog.com/how-cohen-raids-and-trumps-reactions-edge-us-toward-confrontation
I will put this as bluntly as I know how: There is no way that the U.S. Attorneyโs Office for the Southern District of New York would have sought or executed a search warrant against the presidentโs lawyer without overpowering evidence to support the action. The legal standard for such a search requires only probable cause that criminal activity is taking place. Under normal circumstances, which these are not, the prudential and policy factors counseling against such an action would be powerful.
For starters, the Justice Department is institutionally cautious about searches involving attorneys acting in their role as attorneys. As Paul Rosenzweig noted, โthe U.S. Attorneyโs Manual has an entire section that limits how and when the offices of an attorney may be searched. Realizing full well that such searches are in derogation of the value of the [attorney-client] privilege, the manual requires high-level approvals, the exhaustion of other investigative avenues, and specifies procedures that are to be followed to limit the intrusion on privileged documents.โ Moreover, the Justice Department would have been additionally cautious about seeking any warrant against this particular lawyerโprecisely because doing so makes clear that a ring is closing around the president. Going after a prominent personโs lawyer for matters related to his representation of the client is, after all, an aggressive act toward the client, not just toward the lawyer. And Trump is, as he puts it, a counterpuncher.
This is the kind of step that would predictably elicit a reaction. The Justice Department simply would not take such an action lightly or without evidence that emphatically supports it. Add these prudential, legal and policy factors together and they cumulatively suggest that the evidence supporting the warrant application likely exceedsโprobably by farโwhat is legally required.
SO impeach Trump and let Pence fight the Syrian World War 3
๐ฉ
Pence / Mattis 2018
Any good?
For PJW not my favourite
Then why did you link?
cus he made good points
Then gib summary
do I link every video he makes?
it's legit less than 5mins
can you explain it in 4?
If you pay me
i'll think about it
for longer than 4 minutes?
Ooo
Paul Ryan is out?
```7. The FBI Never Treated Hillary Clinton This Way. This is perfectly obvious. Hillary wasnโt merely allowed to delete 33,000 documents from her computer server three weeks after revelations that she had a private computer server, she was protected by the DOJ and the FBI, which allowed her personal attorney, Cheryl Mills โ who was also under investigation โ to invoke attorney-client privilege to stop the FBI from investigating Hillaryโs email scheme.```
RINO
In this case, no, considering his vacancy means another person with an R next to his name fills it
yep
hes setting up a presedential run has to be
he's going to get demolished
getting out of the goverment for at least 6 years would provide enough time to cure any major issues
lol thought I saw Paul Ryan once
What at Culvers?
at my church I think lol, still seems weird because I live 40 mins away from Janesville
Really makes you wonder <:makes_you_think:382980749780844554> <:think_woke:378717098681171988>
Sargon is Centre Left, Lindsay is sitting Libertarian atm
I don't see this guys point
lol
http://www.liberalists.uk/map/
Haven't checked this in a while
Labor still batting 100% though <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>
<:think_hitlerdidnothingwrong:378717099952177162>
```Reply from Amnesty International
Dear Paul,
Thank you for your email.
The right to freedom of opinion and expression should be one of the cornerstones of any society. This right includes "the freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media, regardless of frontiers" (Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19). For more than forty years, Amnesty International (AI) has defended this right against attempts by governments across the globe to stifle religious dissent, political opposition and artistic creativity. ,
However, the right to freedom of expression is not absolute -- neither for the creators of material nor their critics. It carries responsibilities and it may, therefore, be subject to restrictions in the name of safeguarding the rights of others. In particular, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence cannot be considered legitimate exercise of freedom of expression. Under international standards, such "hate speech" should be prohibited by law.,
You can read more about freedom of expression on our website
at;
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/free-speech-freedom-expression-human-right
If you have any further queries, or if we can help in any other way, please don't hesitate to get in touch.
Kind regards,
Supporter Communications Team
Amnesty International UK Section
The Human Rights Action Centre, 17 - 25 New Inn Yard, London
EC2A 3EA Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7033 1777
www.amnesty.org.uk```
hmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmm
mmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
๐ค
Paul
lel
fucking Paul, Reaps is a fucking southern hemisphere chav.
It's from the website, you spastics.
Lol
Can't believe the british mps take so long to respond
get this man elected https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-Q8t7K6Sas
good lord I'm laughing my toosh off
I nutted upon seeing that title
if Styx wins a governorship, a new dawn is truly upon the horizon
fuck yea it will. Though I would love to see Styx run for Congress after he become a governor, but he said D.C is too drenched in deep state muck for him to want to, which is understandable
This New America will be so glorious.
I can't even imagine what his opponent is going to think about it
Like who the fuck am I running against?
How do I even react to this?
It isn't dressed up in a suit spewing spin and rhetorical crap, how do I even?
Styx for governor
imagine styx showing up to a debate bare chested
omfg
fuck
yes
@Deleted User What's your opinion on Service guaranteeing Citizenship?
He said if he delivers a state address he'll be wearing the jacket.
I know. I love the audacity
I'm gonna savor every goddamn second of that
"vermonters" are salty about this
https://www.reddit.com/r/vermont/comments/8bscft/styxhexenhammer666_running_for_the_governor/
meme jihad against the normie vermonters
yus
fuckin hell Paulie
wot
who is paulie?
@DanConway that's some breaking fucking news right there
Attorney General Paxton said. โI want to thank the Attorney General of California, the U.S. Department of Justice, federal law enforcement officials, Nueces County District Attorney Mark Gonzalez, and the prosecutors and law enforcement in my office for their outstanding collaborative work on this investigation and prosecution.โ
Yeah, I want to thank all those people too.
God's work right there.
Wow, they really don't like Styx in Vermont, do they?
could be because they're le redditors
@Fitzydog
Most people don't even know the guy
Don't base your opinion, on a heavily biased corner of the internet
Sargon's Waifu on the warpath
https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/984701007807496192
@Broo TulsiGang 2024 ๐ฌ๐ง ๐บ๐ธ
She is right
Tulsi is generally very good on Forgein Policy stuff
but she served, so that makes sense
tulsi is broo's waifu too
@Broo TulsiGang 2024 ๐ฌ๐ง ๐บ๐ธ
A few served too, McCain was a war prisoner, if I'm not wrong
McCain is a warhawk. Fuck that guy
Lindsay Shepard is my Waifu
For now
And she is not even that hot tbh
Fair enough
you listen to him broo
brazilians really know what makes their peckers work
Sheโs mine you fuck
Donโt you actually have a fiancรฉe jdm?
Or was that slang for โbody pillowโ ?
Jdm is weeb confirmed
Styx just withdrew from the governor race
He's concerned about his income from international viewers becoming an issue with state election law
Huh
Yeah, Idk. I don't think it's as big of a problem as he does
Trump had an international income
If he incorporated the campaign arm of his brand though, and only let Vermont residents donate to it, while keeping the funds from his Patreon and YouTube separate, that might work.
That was fast
Yeah
I listened to her interview wtih Mark Steyn
she mentions she has a new boyfriend
who is 'far right'
nfi what qualifies as 'far right' to her, though
Probably a Bernie supporter.
*GAYYYYYYYYY*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a65tt9mbdsQ
that was brief
yeap
182,758 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 39/732
| Next