it's a fucking brick

but I don't have to have facecuck and twatter 24/7

aaaah I thought you meant a solution to the problem of that dude existing in the world

well

hit him with my phone, it seemed rather simple

:P

🚁

but yes, a friend of mine does the same thing, uses an old brick phone

I have an android phone with a custom OS without any google services because I use it as a portable computer sometimes

the thing is, I wasn't joking, he said "Most of us can’t do that anymore.", and that's true if you're actually stupid

you're unable to figure out ways to handle abstract problems

I bet that's not what he wanted his readers to take away from the story

but that's another problem with being stupid, you don't know that you are :P

and if you are smart you realise how dumb you are

every day I am reminded of how stupid I am

but I don't agree that that makes me smart

smart enough to realise you are stupid

Muslim thinks the Hackers aren't authoritarian enough

well shit son

I didn't see any Russian Ads

FeelsGoodMan

you used the tool?

on

no

I don't see any ads

ah, no, me neither, and I don't use facebook either

I know how to use a computer

well

you say that, but my experience is that when people say that, they just think they do :P

ok

it's really quite amazing, people will call a plumber to fix their water pipes, and an electrician to fix an outlet, but they're all experts on "using their computer"

I think it's because people have a much more intimate connection to their computer hardware

You think the Internet is your ally?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F157geaXp_w

how the fuck is it ok to sue someone for not making you a cake

does their Lawyer sucks ass?

I could defend myself and win that case

you cannot compel me to make you a cake for any reason

and that's upholding an appeal WTF

http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2017/11/09/in-the-magazine/the-refuseniks.html

"The answer lies in the way teachers, who are statistically mostly women, evaluate students without reference to objective test scores. Boys are regularly graded well below their actual academic performance."

So childless women shouldn't teach cus they are projecting?

yes, and there has been recent stirrings about how women suppress boys needs to form social hierarchies (bullying is the most visible example of it), and the way that's done is eliminating the opportunity for boys to compete

and once boys can't compete, they become nihilistic and apathetic

I say women, I mean female teachers

a teacher in my capital city talked about it earlier this year, about how our anti-bullying efforts had essentially lead to what she described as a "notable decline in boys participating in the classroom"

so I guess #notallfemaleteachers

my Mother was a Teacher

My mum was a teacher and primary school principle

she finds all this sjw stuff really, really dumb

so why are we all here?

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

to fuck, drink beer, fight, and .. something

HEAR THE LAMENTATIONS OF THEIR WOMEN

I like all those things

well essentially it's the way all politics work, even at the local school levels; the people who REEEEEEE get their way

and they out-reeeeee the sensible teachers

so we have to become teachers?

cus I hate the idea of raising

other people children

as did my Mother. who was a Teacher

but she was not childless

yeah there was a study released early this year over 40 years of 140000 children or whatever until adulthood, and the conclusion is essentially it doesn't matter how you raise your kids as long as you're consistent, fair, and don't use violence as a moral correctional mechanism

stefan molyneux had a long interview with one of the principle researchers on that study, and she wrote a book obviously as well

I cannot support violence

but I do think

childless people shouldn't be teachers

the dry cunt, grey haired feminist shouldn't be teaching kids

I actually agree that childless women should not be teachers, but I don't think the same applies to childless men

at the same time though, isn't that the same argument an SJW uses

like mittens, he asked me "where are you from", during an argument, and it's like - how does it matter?

how does it matter what skin color I am or my sexual orientation to an intellectual argument?

so does it matter if a woman is childless?

I don't know - like I said, I agree with you, but I'm not sure if I can defend that position adequately

It doesn't

BUT

in Females we say they Project

in Males we say they are Pedos

end of day

although they are childless

they might care for the kids more than thier own parents

```"We shall go on to the end. We shall fight at Berkeley, we shall fight in the classroom and in the dorms, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the hallways, we shall defend our freedom, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight in the Womans Studies, we shall fight in the Gender Studies, we shall fight in the Sexuality and Marxist studies, we shall fight in the Humanities; we shall never surrender, and if, which I do not for a moment believe, this freedom or a large part of it were suppressed and ridiculed, then our Speech beyond the seas, REEEEE'ing and declaring, guarded by the Sargon, would carry on the struggle, until, in the God-Emperor's good time, the Free World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the Kekistani people."```

Why does Mittens care where you are from? I don't

well apparently because it's relevant to an intellectual discussion, all SJWs think that

oh

but it's obviously ludicrous - any argument that can't stand on its own merit is not an argument

doesn't matter who poses it, or whatever attributes that person has

BUT

YOUR LIVED EXPERIENCES

lol

which we shall disregard if you're a white cis male anyway

because society is STILL stacked in your favour

WRONG

christ this fucking thread in /r/latestagecapitalism
https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/7mp1ks/unless_theres_another_terror_incident_in_the_usa/

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Reeeeeeeeeee

wot

I'd love to see what parameters they used to qualify certain events as 'terrorist attacks' and which ones to discard

^this

They also only start counting after... which date again?

also, even if that statement is correct to any degree, what point does it prove or make?

that one day when like, a big thing happened?

In a major US city?

and a bunch of people died?

what was it...

that the koraan equals peace?

Oh, 9/11, that's right.

perhaps two things can't be evil at the same time, so we either need to pick white supremacy OR islam

Of course, because the world is simply opressors and opressed, it's not like humanity is a mixed bag.

It's not like every "group" has it's degenerates. That'd be too hard.

oppress*

I'mma go out on a limb here and say that most terrorist attacks committed in arab muslim countries were... committed by arab muslims *WOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAH*

Dats racis

Not all Muslim people are Muslim

It's only Jihad

I'm a feminist genocide advocate

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/946460939578167296

"Americans should reserve their rage for Republicans, who have spent years targeting the I.R.S. for political gain. Since 2010, Congress has cut the agency’s budget by nearly $1 billion, or 18 percent, adjusted for inflation, as the I.R.S. processes about 10 million more tax returns. Its work force has been whacked by 21,000, ..."

let's just _forget_ the political oppression conveniently, shall we

also, they still then presumably have a budget of around 4 billion, which is what? 12 million _per citizen_ per year?

that sounds ludicrous

Annual budget $11.4 billion (2015)

says wikipedia

well I got that math wrong, nevermind :P

so their budget is $35 per citizen

"The agency apologized for its improper audits, and a Justice Department investigation found mismanagement but no evidence of a crime. Though the audits occurred before Mr. Koskinen came aboard, Republicans clamored for him to be impeached, an action not taken against an administration official besides the president since the 1870s."

I don't understand this reasoning - is the simple fact that the tool hasn't been used in 100+ years an argument for not using it?

https://thebaffler.com/latest/the-forgotten-man-ganz

"The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong are more powerful than is commonly understood. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist. Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back.", quote from John Maynard Keynes' book

and then the article above starts with "This is not a theory of history likely to find many supporters today."

how can he just assert that out of thin air

I certainly support it

"Trumpism, we are often told, represents the end of conservativism as a movement guided by ideas and intellectuals"

I've never been told that

so, that's the start of this article - the premise, and the article is a ~35 minute read according to my software

"Throughout the early 20th century, eugenics would become mainstream thinking, leading to abuses like forcible sterilization and the entire Nazi movement." <:what:382980756139409409>

I mean there's no doubt that the nazis used eugenics from the very start of their political reign, but is it fair to say that the whole concept of nazism, or the ensuing regime, would not exist if not for the concept of eugenics?

I'd say it's a ludicrous statement, hitler didn't write his books until after being imprisoned for the failed coup, and it was a direct result of the treaty of versailles

https://medium.com/neodotlife/intelligence-genes-eb18c5ef759c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwUtA2Rxieo

LUUL

that's one thing dave rubin gets right, he doesn't have a 40 second intro with crappy music

@Broo TulsiGang 2024 🇬🇧 🇺🇸 which part is funny? it's 1 hour and 30 minutes, and even at 2x speed it's really boring

and this host is not informed at all, he should at least do 30 minutes of research preparation for his guest

I know both of them for years

so it's all hilarious

cus they are both centre Left

but very different

might have known Rich almost 20 years

https://www.ft.com/content/f1435a8e-372b-11e7-bce4-9023f8c0fd2e

lots of alarmist talk, and then halfway through the article, they sink their own alarmist take on the situation entirely

"When asked by the FT about a specific customs agreement, one sanguine Indian diplomat first denied it existed, then said it would not matter anyway: “I’m sure people have forgotten it.” "

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42523045

SeemsGood

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42517555

haha

https://archive.fo/1Dsz7 Bruh. This.... is... this is savage af. I mean oh my god.

Kilroy is ded LUUL

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42524076

Corbyn thinks he's Centre LUUL

If Corbyn is Centre. What is Left of Corbyn? <:think_literalpepe:378717098630971397>

the greens. and corbyn isnt wrong. because there hasnt been a properly left wing party since clement atlee. its always been left wing light. even with tony blair its been thatcherite light. its a good change.

well yes the NeoCons NeoLibs are the same

I <3 Neocons

imagine living under the tories for 3 terms....... and having no real opposition.

thats where we are currently. and corbyn is going to win the next election because of this.

its been almost a decade of tory rule.

I have and a Commie isn't opposition

lol the only people who actually believe that meme are sargon fans and daily fail readers

he has support of communists =/= corbyn being one himself

he has said hes a staunch socialist.

but that =/= communism

and when we are talking socialism. we have to frame it under what would be acceptable for socialism to do within the uk

its really dishonest to lable corbyn a communist and then perpetuate that lie.

I think it's funny when people claim that socialism, communism, democracy, freedom, tyranny, has to be judge by location and culture. "Freedom and democracy might be good for the USA, but not for country XYZ, it's a different culture, they're better off not having it."

well look at this way. the infastructure for socialism isnt there in the us. and thts why it will fail. because of how much change you would need in order for it to succeed. where as in the uk. were already quasi socialist.

I'm going to called Corbyn a Commie everyday until he forms the ability to answer a question LUUL

>implying socialism can succeed

daniel are you from the uk?

Nope.

or the us?

Neither.

ok where?

I'm from the internet.

well lets put it in the us. forms of socialism are education and social security.

in the uk its health care, education national insurance etc etc.

its already working. but the tory government is trying to stamp it out and put spanners in the works.

there actually behind schedule for selling off the nhs

Healthcare in the UK is already working?

it was and it does but when you have privatisation happening and governments deliberatley doing things to make every little part of the nhs hurt

it makes the nhs really difficult to support financially because of the sanctions the government is putting on it.

Isn't that the whole argument for not letting the government run social programs? Because it has no clues, nor the motivation, to do it properly?

they are designing to sell it off.

"Management by numbers."

no the idea of the nhs is that everyone has the same health care.

put if this way

the whole country has a bigger buyer power than a few select private companies

therefore the cost of things are cheaper because you are buying in bulk

where as lots of different private companies buying things

increases the costs.

and they will have a proft incentive to profit of sick people

which i believe is ethically compromised

if you get cancer in the us. you can go bankrupt

in the uk you get the treatment without worrying about that.

just pay the taxes that you do so in the eventuality of you becoming sick

you are covered.

everyone pays the same and everyone gets the same accsess to treatment.

you still can go private if you want to.

Except when hospitals are overcrowded and they can't get treatment.

On paper, everyone could get treatment.

everyone does.

Really? Then why do they publish news like this all the time: https://www.politico.eu/article/what-britains-health-care-nhs-crisis-means-for-theresa-may-jeremy-corbyn/

its just that there as i said alot of sanctions that the current government are putting on its workers and finances are making it really difficult for the nhs to thrive

we need to remove the tory bullshit thats making it harder for it to thrive.

they are trying to sell its assests off

through the naylor report

they are making doctors work 70 to 80 hour work weaks

weeks

to make them leave

which is dangerous for patient care

they arnt giving them a pay rise at all while they give tax breaks to the wealthy

if you want an informative video on this watch this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz5dl9fhj7o&ab_channel=TEDxTalks

Doctors are working silly hours cus, everyone I know that would make a good Doctor or Nurse

does some BS job like Social Media for Oxfam

LUUL

it's ok guys, they are HELPING!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42528712

Dude looks like an uglier Trump

http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/574416d81600002a00f9446a.jpeg

https://news.sky.com/story/prince-philip-asks-if-bearded-man-is-a-terrorist-11191136

ayy lmao

Irish terrorists

Aren't they all though?

Yes

https://i.imgur.com/ClFk6sJ.jpg

The Irish are a contentous people

https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/947600296837918725

LUUL

Iceland is 100% white though

I'm not even kidding there are literally no immigrants in Iceland they are purely norwegians

https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F12%2F31%2Fhillary-clinton-backer-paid-500g-to-fund-women-accusing-trump-sexual-misconduct-before-election-day-report-says.html#pt0-406269

"no immigrants in Iceland they are purely norwegians"

<:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>

They're 100% immigrants.

inb4 "whites can't be immigrants, they're colonizers"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-42433669