#general (Discord ID: 267086373285134338) in Realism, page 950
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
I LOVE IT
can't sell their cheap chinese crap anymore
or are preparing for such an eventuality
IT IS POSSIBLE THAT COSTCO SIMPLY BEAT THEM
BY OFFERING BETTER QUALITY
AND LOOSENING UP MEMBERSHIP RESTRICTIONS
that would be a good development too
yeah, you can get a good lunch at costco for like $5 or less
i mean, it's pizza and hot dogs
but good quality
and i guess non-members can buy alcohol
VERY TRUE BUT NOW THE HERD IS AT COSTCO
HOW LONG DO YOU THINK QUALITY WILL LAST, WHEN THE HERD CANNOT RECOGNIZE IT?
BUT I AGREE THOSE HOT DOGS ARE PRETTY GOOD
I LOVE JUNK FOOD
WELL, GOOD JUNK FOOD
IF YOU DO NOT MIND A PARADOX
yes, I've noticed this too. Soon will be just a slightly better than walmart
i haven't noticed a drop in quality
amazon seems best for most purchases I find up here
```What follows, then? That one had better put on gloves before reading the New Testament. The presence of so much filth makes it very advisable. One would as little choose “early Christians” for companions as Polish Jews: not that one need seek out an objection to them... Neither has a pleasant smell.```
—Friedrich "The Hammer" Nietzsche, *The Antichrist*, from **No. 46**
```The “early Christian”— and also, I fear, the “last Christian,” whom I may perhaps live to see— is a rebel against all privilege by profound instinct— he lives and makes war for ever for “equal rights.”...Strictly speaking, he has no alternative. When a man proposes to represent, in his own person, the “chosen of God”— or to be a “temple of God,” or a “judge of the angels”— then every other criterion, whether based upon honesty, upon intellect, upon manliness and pride, or upon beauty and freedom of the heart, becomes simply “worldly”— evil in itself... Moral: every word that comes from the lips of an “early Christian” is a lie, and his every act is instinctively dishonest— all his values, all his aims are noxious, but whoever he hates, whatever he hates, has real value... The Christian, and particularly the Christian priest, is thus a criterion of values.```
he makes some good points
I am reading "Culture of Critique"
@Josh , you might find this interesting: https://archive.org/details/TheScienceOfAnti-semitism_632
Alexander C. Cuza's essay (in 6 pages) 'The Science of Antisemitism'
Cuza was "the professor" to whom Codreanu, the honourable and valiant nationalist martyr, looked up to as an intellectual.
Thanks, I'll check it out
THREE STAGES IN THE MAKE-UP OF ANTI-SEMITISM
According to this theory of ours, in the make-up of anti-Semitism we must distinguish three stages: instinct, consciousness, science.
*Instinct* always made the crowd, firstly preoccupied by its immediate material interests, oppose Jewish parasitism through popular movements, often times general and bloody, as it was among many others all over, e.g., the terrible movement of the Cossacks in the Ukraine led by Bogdan Hmelnischy in which over 250,000 Jews perished in 1649.
*Consciousness* of the Jewish menace is awakened gradually, first in the educated classes. Then it spreads and penetrates the masses. The former group unites with the people in supporting their demands. The latter thus become progressively aware themselves.
*Science* begins with partial researches, until it reaches - only in our day – the determination of its objective, namely, studying Judaism as a social phenomenon, lifted out from the medium in which it seeks to hide, concluding that it is a human problem, in fact the biggest, whose solution must be found.
—Alexander C. Cuza, 'The Science of Antisemitism'
I am a Jew
I am subverting the altright slowly but surely
Every time people on altright chats screech about hating Jews I get together with my friends from synagogue and laugh about it over bagels
"Lmao the goyim don't know"
can all the socialist here raise their hand?
SOCIALISM IS GREAT
AT WRECKING NATIONS
EVEN IN NORTHERN EUROPE
IT HAS MADE PEOPLE MISERABLE
str8 capitalism has about as bad a track record
They're both super dysfunctional
IT HAS A MUCH BETTER TRACK RECORD
HOWEVER, NO ONE WOULD WANT CAPITALISM STRAIGHT
IT IS AN ECONOMIC SYSTEM, NOT A SOCIAL DESIGN.
THIS IS WHY HIERARCHY IS IMPORTANT
IF YOU HAVE HIGHER SOCIAL CASTES IN CHARGE, NO RACE TO THE BOTTOM
WHEN PROLES ARE IN CHARGE...
It doesn't function well at all. It suffers from destructive boom bust cycles. Worker wages get driven down while govt expenditures aren't allowed to rise. Thus most people can't afford to consume the value of the goods and services they provide. Sales drop and so do profits. The investment plutocracy pulls what profits are gained and funnels them into financial products resulting in speculative bubbles which pull even more money out of the productive economy. When they pop depression occurs. This was common place throughout the capitalist industrial world for two centuries until the great depression saw the replacement of capitalism with other systems like soc dem, fascism, socialism and Communism.
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES RISING IS A CONSEQUENCE OF DEMOCRACY
THE BOOM BUST CYCLE IS DRIVEN BY THE DISCOVERY OF NEW INDUSTRIES AND OVER-INVESTMENT BY CLUELESS PROLES
YOU HAD NONE OF THIS UNDER THE ARISTOCRATS
No the expenditures **aren't** allowed to rise
Also not true. The tulip mania of the 17th century happened while plenty of aristocrats and monarchs were in power
How about the south sea bubble?
Aristocrats weren't really in power in the 17th century.
You forget that by the renaissance, effective power was switching to bankers and investors, more than pure aristocracy.
Aristocracy had a certain function and title, but they were certainly not completely in power. Even kings had to bow down to the banks.
What is needed is a true caste system, where money handlers are servants.
Who are effectively an aristocracy 😒
From the middle ages to the 20th century, it is not just discrete moments that cause the loss of power of the monarchy, but rather a slow, gradual change.
No. You confuse "got power" with "aristocracy"
you are using the confused, generic term for "aristocracy" as "whoever is up there"
It's a pants shitting retarded distinction. Who owns the productive economy?
it is not a retarded distinction
it is a qualitative distinction
like the term "noble"
aristocracy is made up of nobles
nobility is not made with money (alone)
yeah muh meritocratic ______would never do stupid things
You brought up money not me
In terms of power
What I am getting at, is that you are conflating
No it's called political economics
Simplifications that obfuscate the truth.
you can say "the upper class", if you like
but "aristocracy" and "nobility" mean something else
in today's world , the "upper class" is an ascended merchant class, not a "nobility"
dude political economics was a field of study
"dude", that doesn't change the meaning of what we are discussing
you know what else is a "field of study"? Women's studies
the point being, that doesn't mean they got this right, at least not completely
that flattening of terms and doing away with quality is a Marxist thing
I am giving you reasons why it is wrong
it flattens out and erases distinctions that are meaningful, and functional
an aristocratic class does things differently than an ascended MERCHANT class, for DIFFERENT REASONS, and WITH DIFFERENT GOALS
You aren't giving anything substantive other than semiotics over labels
I've made claims
here follows more
Please no more
an aristocratic class is concerned with the preservation of structure and excellence, with quality in society, and thus is interested in the really long-term effects
an ascended merchant class is concerned with profit exclusively
I've given you substantial and clear statements at every step.
`an aristocratic class is concerned with the preservation of structure and excellence, with quality in society, and thus is interested in the really long-term effects`
I lold hard
IF you insist on being a pampered college boy without manners, that is a different issue
I'm out @diversity_is_racism , not going to waste my time with this sort of individual.
`aristocrats are defined as the following positive connotations. Merchants are defined as the following negative connotations.` scholarly insight brother
I'm glad he left
He has no idea how much more vig knows than him
I'm leaving the dojo senpai because this guy wouldn't play into my word games
ACTUALLY PELAGIUS MADE THE VALID POINT HERE
WE WOULD LOOK AT FREQUENCY, NOT ANECDOTES
no he really didn't. An aristocracy is just a description of power resting in the hands of a small class. In a feudal society that meant those who owned the land and passed it down via hereditary in most cases. In a capitalist society, power rests in the hands of those who own industry which is typically a small number of people residing in the investment class. In a socialist society, power rests in the hands of a few bureaucrats.
Straight forward objective descriptions without emotional connotations
what what 👐
"An aristocracy is just a description of power resting in the hands of a small class." NOT CORRECT; THERE IS A SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE CLASS.
" In a capitalist society, power rests in the hands of those who own industry which is typically a small number of people residing in the investment class." -- ALSO NOT TRUE, AS CAPITALISM ENCOURAGES MARKET ENTRY (BUT GOVERNMENT RETARDS IT)
THE BIGGER POINT IS
SOME HAVE ABILITIES THAT OTHERS DO NOT
ADVANCE THOSE, AND THINGS GO WELL
RETARD THEM, AS IN SOCIALISM, AND THINGS GO POORLY
For me etymology is definitive
I always go to the word roots to see what they mean
The selection processes have nothing to do with the description of the structures of power and their relationship with wealth
And I mean CEOs have to perform to the demands of the investors or they get replaced.
A feudal monarch can revoke the title of aristocrats all the same
Str8 aristocrats could do the same via assembly
But they don't really get their status from much beyond having acquired land via conquest
EXILARCH, always trapped in abstractions.... this is not about who knows more, or what the dictionary says. But you've proven, time and again, that dialogue is impossible with you. The only way to talk to people like you is in person, where physical presence demands manners or altercation.
@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻, you confuse qualitative descriptions with emotions. You saw everything described through preconceived lenses. The use of the term nobility seems impossible to fathom for you, beyond the meaning flattened by materialists.
Straight forward objective descriptions without emotional connotations, is precisely what I gave you
It just did not match what your book or your professor told you
if all you have is shit about me you made up then, great
Also exilarch is perfectly capable of dialogue
your mom gay
you ain't fooling me with your tricks gypsy
good qualities to aristocrats bad qualities to merchants. Warm fuzzy cold prickly
GYPSY PRICKS WITH YOUR HALF DICK TRICKS
GO BACK TO YOUR DADS VIRGINA
MOST DO IT WRONGLY
FOR EXAMPLE, "ARISTOCRACY"
5'7" 175lb only 20% bf, gonna hit 1/2/3/4 this year. You can't handle this bitch nigga
I'm Irish too so I got that boxer blood
Fuck yall faggot, you never get my lucky charms
You gonna get fucked up by a hobbit nigga
bounce like a bagel left hook like a hebrew
There he goes again.
Cool stats, "bro".
Burst hessian warband command til war
": 5'7" 175lb only 20%"
I thought you practiced martial arts for real! I thought you were an athlete!
Moral of the story: never trust internet chest-beating.
Fuck you beaner you can't handle my stank
This hobbit gonna beat you like a piñata
Prozak says we potato niggers for a reason
You about to find out
On another note I'm real excited for the next season of Houseki no Kuni
I Just hope they keep the same opening theme
Me too that line `ching chang bao pho dao lo pow` is really moving when sung by such a delicate voice.
So our social sciences teacher was talking to us about income inequality and stuff and he mentioned neomarxist theory
Then he went on to say how mechanized farming is bad and all
And then I rekt him by saying that there's a lot of demand for these sorts of products and mechanized farming is the only way to get everyone what they want, and we can't just ask for "naaaaatural prooooducts" because that's being childish and unrealistic because it doesn't work as a business model
My English teacher from my advanced course (I happen to have a lot of talent with languages so since school English classes are too easy for me I take outside classes to get examination levels and all) was also talking to us about this sort of stuff, I guess
To me this is either vegan rethoric or rich-shaming
Why is mechanical farming bad
It's not, but let me explain why I'm talking about it
Basically when my teachers were talking about this stuff that's basically PETA-level vegan rethoric and also the test we did today kinda indulged in rich-shaming and all
(I kinda associate veganism with leftism I guess)
It is ultra commie
Yeah, that's what I'm saying
Rich-shaming is communism in disguise
"Oooooh how are we going to feed the pooooor??? You should feel bad for being able to live!!" -today's exam
I think a world without rich or poor people would be boring
AKA communism is boring
Should've said you only want to feed white poor people
Leftism is boring because it tells people they can't stand out
Let the other poor people starve
Well the test actually meant the opposite, feed the poor children of Africa but let the failed musician on the street starve
Of course it did
Yeah. Fuck cultural marxism.
Tell her you want to open a concentration camp and tell poor poc it's a welfare office
Also in Spain there's a lot of demonization of men
Uh my social sciences teacher's a guy lol
Yeah, there's a lot of feminist rethoric over here
Technically male yes
It's sickening because no one realizes
They're always talking about sexist violence and abuse but never bring up how women can be just as bad and the law actually defends them
Why is every country retarded
Just a little while ago there was this case where a girl fucked a bunch of guys on the street but she didn't like it so she cried rape and she got the whole national media against them
In fact before we knew she was lying, I already realized so in spanish class (well we don't call it Spanish class we just call it language but whatever) I wrote an article and my teacher, being a badass, decided to publish it on the school magazine
In the article I said that the media demonizes men and puts too much attention on rape and abuse cases, which aren't the worst crimes and sins known to humanity
Also the law kinda let women lie and get away with lying about abuse or rape when a women's the alleged victim and a man's the alleged culprit a few years ago, and innocent men would go to jail even with a lack of evidence
So typical b.s.
TL,DR if Sweden's mantra is "gender is a social construct" (spoiler: it's not a social construct. Only too genders), Spain's mantra is "down with the patriarchy"
We even get crazy feminists like Americans do
Typical BuzzFeed dyed-hair landwhale feminists protesting every now and then
I just want to get done with these last 4 years of school before I go to the UK for my animation and game design degree. Spain's a bit of a feminist shithole. I still love my country, but that's too far.
Why do the military not shoot the fat people protest
I don't really hate fat people but I'm against fat acceptance
That's not healthy, dude
I can keep up with eating a bucket of McNuggets every now and then because I do martial arts twice a week
You can't just say "I'm beautiful as I am" because you might get DIABEETUS
Also a heart attack I guess
i hate fat people
Even if they are perfectly healthy they are ugly so I hate them
they arent perfectly healthy, they are fat
It's a hypothetical
I hate ugly people
Only attractive people are good
I watch anime primarily to get away from western cunty behavior. Anything western would be all DID YOU JUST ASSUME MY GENDER YOU REDNECK SHITLORD sassy black womyn. Western media = put downs of people you don't like, sex, sex, sex, muh dik, make fun of a group it's PC to make fun of, 100% toilet humor, no humor that doesn't involve shit or sex, cuckolding interracial shit, "quirky" jewish nerds, manly bald niggers typecast into the same character in 30 movies
HOLLYWOOD IS BLIGHT
SERIOUS BRAIN AIDS
there was just an article done on fashwave through some media site, ig, and Art Right got some of their art featured on it
also like 2 of my older pics
but this is huge for us
plus a video
they wasted printer ink on our art
I don't trust any non whites
I don't even trust white people who lack a ruddy red/pink flush in their skin
I don't trust Whites with dark eyes
Because skin color alone doesn't make someone your ally
That being said, we should abandoned the narratives created by our enemies and the stupid ones who bought into them.
An ally is only an ally until the immediate threat is gone.
I have brown eyes but am pale as the moon
Dark eyes are different from brown eyes. They are practically black in appearance.
I have green-brown eyes
They look werid
I basically look like hornswoggle