@Roma Invicta WE ALREADY DO THAT. UNDER DIFFERENT BANNERS.

HA

Hey you guys Richard Spencer just committed suicide

Ops is on base percentage + slugging

Lol not really sure what I'm going to be banned for, but if that's the route to wanna go it's not my server

@Mister Johnson HE DOESN'T HAVE TIME TO COMMIT SUICIDE. HE'S ON OUR PODCAST NEXT WEEK.

Behead those who insult richard spencer

@Horns he came into vby chat and wigged out over people telling him he was a faggot

What podcast is it

Or ban them atleasr

But openly admitted to being a tranny

Bain Dewitt was the neoconservative right?

Yea

How big is Spencers wee wee?

Is he Jewish too?

I dunno

@Mister Johnson TROLLING: LEARN HOW OR DON'T BOTHER.

Can someone send me a picture of it

REBEKKA IS PMING ME

Who invited him @༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻?

Its a genuine question

Why is alt right run by homos and fat Jews having trannies write for them?

Spencer gave me the link

We are close buds

There are more gays and trannies in alt right than there are in the wsws.

Heebs will not divide us. Ammirrite

I think free speech should be abolished

rebekka888 - Today at 7:05 PM
while i do understand the politically corrected-ness need to not have terroristic people on the amerika server, i very much foresee the day when whites in america will either need to wage war against those who would put them to the blade, or die silently, and relegate the white race to myth and legend, the New Elves, as it were.

Are you gay @Mister Johnson?

Sorry thats not allowed here

So @Nester?

@Nester sturm did a general invite on fb

Being straight is gay

How many joined in as a result @༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻?

Im Mexican BTW

Rip

I empathise with 1488 tho

I wana preserve the existence of white people

It said "as it were" unironically. Never allow it back

In rape pens

Join me in vc please

me?

farewell rebekkah

he was always more of a taker than a giver in conversation. no loss

@Diminatas go on home British soldiers

bring back the corn laws

big purge here ?

@Nester I don't remember it was back when the channel first started

Who got banned other than Rebekkah?

ONLY REBEKKA

@Roma Invicta you seem motivated, what is it you want to do when you say "organize ops"?

@UOC
That it's okay to be white campaign was fairly successful. You'll have success in gaining support through social engineering to expose underlying social biases

You need to make people react

Consider this idea

based on McLuhan's observation that "the medium is the message"

the next step might be someone running for office with that statement

not a white power sentiment but an "its okay to be white" level statement

and not high office. just like state house of reps or something

http://celebmafia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/kate-hudson-world-of-cyberobics-presentation-in-berlin-germany-april-2016-1.jpg

kate hudson's face is way wider than I remember

amerika is a veteran alt right site

Happy veterans day

you know what? in honor of veterans' day, I am going to go on a bruce charlton reading spree

I guess I will start at the beginning in 2008

let's start with a recent one

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2017/11/which-self-identified-christians-are.html

tldr this is honestly schizophrenic garbage and I cannot for the life of me figure out what in the fuck he is trying to say

@Mother https://www.counter-currents.com/2017/06/reply-to-daniel-friberg/

"Which christians are heading towards apostasy? Well, it depends on their motivations. Even doing the right thing for the wrong reasons is bad. The old testament clearly says this"

Let's start here:
1. What is apostasy in this sperg's mind?
2. If even doing everything right but having the wrong thoughts is still apostasy, how in the fuck do you know which thoughts are right?
3. where is any of this found in his bible?

Is this faggot seriously just making it up as he goes? How is he any better than a kentucky preacher denying darwin?

```
But do we know our own motivations for sure? Well, we better had (and if we do not know, we had better find out as quickly as possible) - that is all I can say; because nobody else knows for sure. And if we know our own motivations are correct, then we can and should Stand Against The World (because the world is badly-motivated, and sure to be wrong). ```

Wait... first off, nobody knows all of their motivations, that is what the unconscious mind is. Secondly, he never provides even the slightest, most loose framework for determining correctness of one's motivations. He in no uncertain terms says having the right motivations is the difference between heaven and hell despite equally good works, but provides not even the slightest way of measuring good vs unacceptable motivations

does that not seem like somewhat of an oversight?

https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1490/41/1490411776008.webm

he literally said a whole post without actually saying anything

no wonder dallot likes this guy, their thought processes are equally schizophrenic and full of neologism

okay, back to the 2008 stuff

let's start here http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2008/01/

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/118174440/

this is unreadable

this is literally schizophrenic rambling

Man. That German Revolution hit me hard.

Big if true!

okay, now we might have some paydirt to actually comment on: http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2008/09/

```One of C.S. Lewis’s most famous arguments in support of Christianity is that the instinctive but otherworldly yearning emotion of ‘joy’ (in German, Sehnsucht) implies that there exists some means of satisfying this urge; otherwise humans would not experience it.

This is sometimes termed the ‘argument from desire’. In brief, it states that because humans profoundly and spontaneously desire something not of this world, the experience suggests the reality of the supernatural. Lewis used the argument in many of his best known Christian writings. In Mere Christianity, he argues that ‘[i]f I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world’. In ‘The Weight of Glory’, he notes that ‘we remain conscious of a desire which no natural happiness will satisfy’. And in the autobiographical Surprised by Joy, he comments that ‘[i]n a sense, the central story of [his] life is about nothing else’. ```

Speaking as someone who actually believes in a religion superficially similar to christianity, this is still some of the most retarded logic I ever have heard of

his rationale here boils down to
```I cannot desire anything unless it exists. I desire X. Therefore, X exists.```

however, that's entirely retarded. I desire to chug frappuccinos 24/7/365 while having no health effects and never getting remotely fat from it at all. Does that imply that the means exists somewhere to do that, and I experienced it before and just forgot it?

no, that doesn't make any fucking sense, at all

his presumption that "the supernatural existing is the simplest explanation" entirely bypasses making any kind of list of possibilities and looking at what's most likely, he just jumps straight to the conclusion, "it's simplest and thus most accurate"

how is he sure people do not desire something heaven like because they get pleasure from not having to struggle and from only having nice experiences, therefore they daydream what the most pleasant and least stressful possible experience might be?

moving on...

article continues as long autism detailing out how tolkien, a Generic Christian, weaved Christian themes and assumptions into his work. Well, no shit, his world view comes out in his work. That's real rocket science

in his long autistic itemization of ways silmarillion stuff overlaps with his version of christianity, this stands out to me:
```The implication, never made fully clear, is that Men in their freedom may have deviated from their original role as conceived by ‘the One’, and been corrupted or intimidated into worshipping Morgoth, or at least into doing his will and in some way serving his purposes. This, it is suggested, may be the cause of Men’s mortality as such, along with a progressive shortening of their lifespan and a permanent dissatisfaction and alienation from the world they inhabit and even their own bodies. ```

Wait a minute, so in this case, men do the wrong work (worshiping Morgoth) despite the right intent (to not do it) and thus fall and become mortal

did he not just elaborate how doing the wrong works with the right intent or something is better than to do the right works with the wrong intent?

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-upNkiQSEJ3s/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/Kg5Fc-OG68M/s288-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg

who is the brown eyed

he looks kinda metis

Evalion husbando

actually he looks severely metis

FETAL ALCHOLISM

fetal wogism

Exilarch get in voice chat

no I'm sick, throat hurts

busy shitting all over bruce charlton's life

Too much deep throat?

yes the BBC rubbed a blister

Snake call me deepthroat

Fuck those games are retarded

so far this is just a giant text wall of "see? tolkien said christian stuff"

this whole thing is just setting tolkien up as his personal kentucky preacher

CS Lewis makes retarded arguments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1021&v=hj8GmAfenPU

that is a half mexican

I don't care what anyone tells me

american name, racial metis

good job eva, keep that white race alive

@Mother and then you wonder why I at times say things that are critical of the altright

She looks like shit.

He looks like shit.

@Deleted User 57835c2c APPARENTLY THIS GUY PUT HER UP TO HAVING SEX WITH A KNEE GROW

AND THERE IS A VIDEO

yeah vig showed

dalit

altright do not even seem to know what a white person really is anyway

some alt right people seem to think a little bit of race mixing is fine.

eva is mixed with something

she looks eurasian to me

or jewish or something

Mixed with dalitry.

DALITS ALL THAT I SEE
ABSOLUTE HARAM

It's true.

the fact that anyone altright even cares about her at all just tells me they are light brown nationalists

Even now exilarch is a dalit.

Eating meat.

kshatriya eat meat and they are not dalit

faggot

I do not even care about dinduism but if you are going to try to crucify me within dinduism's framework at least take a minute to read any of it

You've given up pretensions of brahminism?

these two are alt right plebs, or outright nazi's, aka proletarian/low caste

I have read more of it than you have, and am capable of understanding more of it than you are.

uh huh, sure thing partner

You are a sensor.

sure is easy to know a lot when you never actually do anything in life that might put your knowledge to the test

All life is a test.

The mind is a test.

the burg is a test

All castes can eat meat, if it is appropriately consecrated.

Who scores the test bro

If it isn't consecrated, it shouldn't be eaten by a born again caste.

Reality scores it.

What does that mean

It means reality scores it.

that's opaque

Why don't we discuss it in voice chat?

my voice literally does not work

so have fun with that

I'll say my magic prayer over my chicken so that it's okay

At vigilance.

He's presently discussing homemade porn and YouTube autism.

evalion

how can I not just properly consecrate meat as needed, eat an all meat diet and still remain entirely brahmin?

Because you lack access to the rites.

given I do not really give a shit I guess that's no big deal

jock supremacy

You are a jock.

yes

Has my Human Quality Index score changed at all @Deleted User 57835c2c?

Or are we on to new measurement systems?

it's still pretty solid

nothing's perfect

What's my score?

okay since I'm sick and can't think straight I gotta think it out

components: mind/body/spirit

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/929511061954297857

mind: you can at least take things to their logical conclusions, which is good. You aren't really that self examined though, and you don't seem to be able to reconsider anything. You lack flexibility. Your mind is essentially Asian. I would give it a B at a glance because it's powerful yet not that good overall

I do feel like I ought to deduct a grade down to C to factor in how dysfunctional your personal neurosis makes you, but just for the kick of it I won't

body: you are racially eurasian leaning towards euro, you are tall, and you seem to have fairly robust bone structure. Your facial features are honestly not so bad. You are skin and bones, but that is because of your ideology and what you do to your diet in response to it. I'll call it a B also

@atavisionary GET IN VOICE

ya, I'm fine, just in a public place

spirit: you're committed to something fanatically, which is respectable. I personally think it's retarded though, and you do not have the sort of inner fire that makes you comfortable asserting yourself and imposing yourself on your environment, embodied by your veganism. To me that is your inner guilt coming out. You feel inferior to your environment. You won't tell anyone else why, but somewhere deep down, you know it.

I suppose in the totality of factors, that would come out around C grade. An F would be a normal braindead Homer Simpson or a Black Lives Matter protestor, an A would be someone with fire and vision, like Hitler

so what is that... B grade mind, B grade body, C grade soul... numerically averaged, that comes out to a HQI of something like 75%

so an overall rating of C

noteworthy in your case is that a C rating does not make you a generic fart person so much as an extremely promising person with extreme dysfunction superimposed

How do two B's and a c average to c

0.80+0.80+0.70 = 2.3, 2.3/3 = 0.76

so there you go, that's my rough estimate of your HQI

if you got rid of the dysfunction you would have a huge HQI but I doubt you would ever do it

woman should do most rearing tasks, men should take care of most defensive, and indirect tasks

What is your hql?

Mine is 20%.

mine? huh, let me crunch that

body: racially 100% good, in good health & condition, good face, not fat but not lean enough either, A- seems fair

I mean I gave you a B, but I am whiter than you and in better condition, so it's not like that's a huge stretch or unfair

mind: I have a lot to demonstrate that I'm real smart, and I have real clear reasoning and observation unlike most people. A+. I am not the only A+, I can clearly point at others. Ludvig would be a good example actually.

You're a sensor.

yes I actually notice reality

You notice physical reality.

spirit: inner fire, will to power, however I'm mixed up about some stuff religiously, I'd actually give myself a C these days

so A-, A+, C = 0.90 + 1.0 + 0.7 = 2.6, 2.6/3 = 0.86 = B

that honestly seems about right, my behavior and spirituality aren't what they have been in the past or theoretically could be

actually that puts me in the same ballpark as vigilance

I think the highest HQI that I can objectively verify is ironically ludvig's

might be carjack, not sure

carjack's body is 100%, mind 100%, moral convictions and will are basically 100% also, but he isn't a mormon so I have to take a letter grade off

that still would give him (100%+100%+90%)/3 = 96%, A

behold carjack, the true overman

@Deleted User 57835c2c WHAT AM I?

I have no way to assess your body or face

by definition figure is indeterminate

mind: you can accomplish stuff, yet have some specific hangups and trigger points, overall behavior is "neurotic" despite high functioning. My gestalt is a B- grade

spirit: you're loyal, but have some specific problems as we discussed. D grade

WAIT. I AM D GRADE OR B- GRADE?

so if you sent me your picture and you were the exact greensborough jock, your theoretical maximum would be 100%+80%+60%=240%, 240%/3 = 80%, B- overall

since I keep running into people who are high functioning yet held back in HQI by neuroses and moral issues, I am considering rendering it as current max vs theoretical optimum

a fraction with actual HQI on top and on the bottom it's their HQI if they had 100% in mind/spirit sections

so in the case of you and wild, the higher number on the bottom would reflect significant capacity to improve

whereas in the case of a POC or a genetic cripple or something, even the optimum number would be low

what goes into your determination of body/face

face: it's a checklist of bone structure from top of face to bottom, from a frontal and profile view

most if it comes out of the hard tissue section of Erectus Walks Amongst Us and also from Madison Grant's Passing of the Great Race

so physiognomy

also, whether or not they are lighter than cardboard and have nonbrown eyes

then I look at things like height/weight/bodyfat%, any family history of medical illnesses, any evidence of actual athletic talent, coordination or toughness

eye color would figure into your theoretical maximum measurement

yes

i'm lighter than cardboard but brown eyes

I think my bone structure is pretty solid

I agree

wait i'm pretty sure I haven't posted any photos of me here

so... one problem is I haven't bothered to figure out a weight for each point I am looking for in the facial analysis, or how to weight face vs frame vs health

you've shown me photos before

of my brothers I think

I don't have them, but I remember thinking you looked like a grappler calisthenist type

oh

I look like them though

so really I have to fudge the overall rating for body as I don't have specific numbers, that's something that one day on a free afternoon I might fix

for example, if you are greensborough jock but with brown eyes, or type 1 diabetes, or you're 5'7", how many points come off?

currently I err on the side of generosity for anyone with the right physiognomy

someday it would be nice to standardize

the medical section would be difficult to standardize but possible

I'd have to actually list out all the major heritable diseases and figure out some kind of autistic rating system

that would probably be a week long grind of a project to just figure out

so there's really some wiggle room

What do I need to do to improve my hqi

for their mind, I just look at how quickly and effectively they solve problems (linear thinking), how proactively they acquire information (self study), and how flexible and intellectually honest their thought process is... for example, a guy who spent a long time developing some really well researched and well reasoned idea on some topic but could not handle hypotheticals of "what if the result here had been different?" then he would be suboptimal

I feel unqualified to tell you at the moment

Ok

so like in Mother's case, he effectively self studied some really accurate conclusions in some areas to achieve some results, but also showed evidence of rigidity/inflexibility

spirit... I basically look at a person's level of inner fire, their conviction to their moral code, and whether or not that moral code is actually any good or not

what do I mean by inner fire? Well it's simple, are they passionate, energetic people or not? I pretty much measure it based on how uncomfortable they are with doing normie things like working 9-5 in an office, talking about television shows with POC coworkers, using dating apps, etc

also by how much drive they have to be creative and how good those creative drives actually are