because nobody likes niggers

you're the reason a cheeto is president

probably cause there were none in Helsinki at the start of the 1990's

damn those days

because Helsinki is a Nazi city

it was at least for a short while

nazis burned our cities

why would Nazis burn their own cities

after we beat the shit out of the commies

I'm a "commie"

show some recstep

ok thats not nice

no one likes you

I don't like you

ok cool

do you happen to know Anders Breivik?

sounds like a nazi

he also beat couple future communists

good chap

transphobe

what is that?

someone who hates trans people

ok

why did you bring it up?

because you hate me because I'm trans

not a good conversation starter

this isn't a conversation start

@MentalSyntaxError @Mother ya'll need to nip the commies in the bud

wow just because I'm trans

yes

but more so because you're a nigger

NO TRANSNIGGERS ALLOWED AT THE AMERIKA GAB

look

just because I suck dick

does not mean I deserve to be banned

i don't think you actually suck dick

how dare you insult my culture

i think you play video games and consume memes and are a nigger

lol

and that's all you'll ever be remembered for

why can't I do all of the above *and* suck dick

because sucking dick would require a strength of activity

you're a weak person

not the way I do it

also I'd argue that playing video games is about as much effort as sucking dick

i agree. it's the perfect analog activity, a marker for malaise and weakness

are you hating on sucking dick

well guess who isn't getting their dick sucked

you guessed wrong

the answer is you

i'll manage

you might but you'll never get my commie succ

💦💦💦

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLzbKm56dLI

how can i make this right

stop appropriating culture

ok

i'll stop appropriating culture

if you stop playing minecraft

>Minecraft

Minecraft is a meme game

everyone left it for roblox

Have a great Monday @everyone !

thank you, have a nice monday too

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/02/19/video-surfaces-of-milo-yiannopoulos-defending-pedophilia-acu-board-reportedly-not-consulted-on-cpac-invite/

“So you’re saying you’ve never seen a 15-year-old girl, at any point in your life, that you thought was hot?” Yiannopoulos asked.

“Yeah, when I was 15!” Rogan replied. “I’m not retarded dude.”

Liar

David Rosales - the craft beer

huehuehue

holy shit

is he ghost writing for craft beers

https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/fr/cp0/e15/q65/16835742_1401218243278471_394915813653812830_o.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=514333d8182a7e75268e3b8a0578db4d&oe=592AD138

LCD - all the hops, all the priming sugar and none of the patience to do a 2-stage fermentation

I thought this place was invite only, where are the Communists coming from

The link is public

It's on amerika.org

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIFE03F7YbI

i like that jared taylor finds the times to play with us kids

ah. that's stupid

Are you the rugged man

yes

im the dildo that gavin mcinnes stuck up the butt

Pretty insulting to jared

Dunno why he agreed to this

gavin fucking sucks

Trv

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170215-the-strange-link-between-the-human-mind-and-quantum-physics

refreshing ^

I hate such lies @devolved

immensely

Which lies

Oh right

Seriously

because it misleads those who mean well

and denies the self

by persistently speaking such lies

one loses their connection to their own self

there are lots of apparently little things in which people are forced to lie like this

slowly losing their grip on "reality"

it may not seem a big deal to acknowledge that a 15 year old girl is hot whether you are 15 or 50

it makes the liar seem in some small way, virtuous

that's the trap

Lies with GASP! behind them

is what I'll call them for now

"black people are not as smart as white people" GASP

"14 year old girls can be quite sexually attractive" GASP

societal pearl clutching for satan

there is no self

Yawn

so what you're trying to say is that ludvig is a plant

Swedes are demonslaves

He does seem to mindless reach for the sun

@vry_o needs more Yoda speak

And passive voice.

And Fenrir likes gay shit toi

He liked nu Abigor

Lamo poppified RAC raw black metal.

For hipsters

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5v42cn/only_sharia_blue_would_downvote_this_picture_of/?utm_term=whitepower1488&utm_campaign=whitepower1488&utm_content=whitepower1488&utm_medium=whitepower1488&utm_source=whitepower1488

EVERY TIME YOU USE THE MAGIC UTM CODES ON REDDIT

IT BREAKS THEIR HEARTS

You still use Reddit?

Have you invited crow in here?

https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/833648208249249793

here's a good idea

all the libtards sperging about sweden being a safe place to be should have the opportunity to go there since we all know THEY WONT BE COMING BACK LOL

I'll stick to CA

http://izismile.com/2010/04/29/will_goats_rule_our_world.html

you ever notice that with cable tv

there's like a constant background noise beneath the dialogue or music

like static

it makes your head buzz

It's all static

Other than the Smithsonian channel

But that's partially static

Can I invite some one here?

the link is already public

GOATSE

Do they have a loft bed too?

An Alt-Righter with opinion on matching shoes and socks properly hatches from the egg

Wrath of Gnon is the #1 ovenposter there is

altright book club Resergence is having our book club meeting in about 15 mins on https://discord.gg/N7EAkcB that discord server. feel free to join us even if you've never read The Master and margarita!

@Jossi I'll skip this one Ever since I haven't got time to read the book due to tons of stuff i've been doing

If you do postpone it in the end i'll have it read

okay we are thinking of putting it off until like the 28 or so

depends on how many people showo up

SODOMIZE

THE

WEAK

AND

HAIL THE

GOAT

http://www.cvltnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/baphomet1-820x820.jpg

@diversity_is_racism the thing I take from quantum physics is that it reaches down into representations and exposes them as such; revealing the world as an incomprehensible dark void of impulses.

If the particle, matter, whatever, doesn't appear in the form we perceive it until it's "observed" but this is the stuff we are made of, than that certainly implies the existence of something outside of that frame which is responsible. More specifically that there is something non-human doing the observation.

A quantum physicist friend of mine said that the observer effect was a misnomer and proffered "perturbation" instead. His view was such that the mere interaction of waveforms was enough to collapse them.

It didn't hit me until now however that Schopenhauer had said about how we are only conscious of something when it resists our will. So if these representations happen regardless of other humans around, the implication is that there is some discrete, multitudinous *will* at this level which, when bumping shoulders, gives rise to this very basic grade of existence we try to make sense out of using physics.

Got off track a bit. There is no god.

So anyway that perturbation is what Schopenhauer was describing from a different lense

It's cool shit

I'm incapable of taking that deeper so don't probe me bb

I don't even know if this would be anything but junk science, to be honest. I don't know that there is something wrong with it, I don't suspect to the point that I would dismiss it but, there are trends in the scientific field that are way too humanist for their own good. Maybe observation does nothing and we just like to think it does?

The conclusion wouldn't be that you can sprout tentacles out of your arm

We definitely experience the effect

so it shouldn't be discarded

That does not mean that a phenomenon is dependent on observation. But I understand the point.

it just means that phenomena are the result of shoulders bumping, more or less. Without such "perturbations" the world is indeterminate potential I guess. That doesn't really matter though.

Since we can't know the answer

No. At least, not off of the models we have now. All of the uncertainty gives egg heads something to do.

We'll never get there

But once we stop trying, we are just going to atrophy. That is the tragedy of the workaholic. I guess we could breed temperaments that make do with uncertainty without stagnance and atrophy.

We could devote energy into how to live instead

ethics

Not to mention the other pillars.

Imagine all of the theorizing that we get today going into high art. Music, painting, sculpting: all of these ideas of how the more subtle world would look to our material eyes and sound to our ears. It would at least be more interesting to me.

It would hit an epistemological crisis all the same

Don't the artsy types thrive in crisis? They love it.

"well fuck, how do you write a good tune."

All of the musicians disagreeing though working at their very best could make an all new explosion of genres and enhance already existing ones. See, they would be creating something. That would fulfill them even with all of their doubts.

yeah but that's not usually the result of theorizing

Theorizing is deconstructive

rationality that is

It's not a creative force

I disagree. Look at Marilyn Manson. His theorizing on the occult led to many of his albums.

I don't know what you mean by his theorizing

I disagree that it can't be creative or lend itself to creativity, not that theorizing isn't deconstructive.

It's literally how the understanding works: it breaks down the "whole" into parts to reason about it. A la categorization

Sitting around and theorizing on how something is. What it is like. What it's properties are. These deep thoughts lead to impressions in the mind that lead to creativity.

How is quantum physics humanist

You know all that wank music out there? The stuff that relies heavily on rational faculties as opposed to our non-rational ones? It doesn't leave a strong impression does it

That's the sort of shit that is derived from artistic theories

I don't think marlyin Manson's aspirations of being the next Alice Cooper using his library card to read occult literature to shock mommy is really a strong example.

@profagonist It isn't. However, the immediate conclusion that a phenomenon must be experienced to have certain properties is. There have been a lot of physicists who rent seek from government grants jumping to these conclusions and others in the "string theory" line of thinking just to publish something. The assumption that humans hold a central role in the universe is humanist.

@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ I would assume that the wank music is there to entertain and to masquerade as art, obsessed with finding "unique" notes and being too self fascinated. When you have deep impressions of immaterial forces, it isn't very rational. When you want to capture an impression and relay it as deeply as possible through your medium, it could make for good music depending on the skill and investment of the artist.

I don't think that's a belief many physicists hold, actually I'd say most think the opposite

@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ Furthermore, we have a dearth of skill among the arts these days. Hopefully, the skilled will elbow the unskilled out of the way. Mediocrity really gets more attention than it deserves.

@profagonist I agree. But THOSE physicists have real jobs.

Physics is basically about arguing against that anthropocentrism

I agree, again, but that does not mean that everyone with the piece of paper sticks to studying physical laws.

I feel like you're describing more Deepak Chopra than a scientist

The Tao of Physics and all that. But that is the subject that gets the most reads though.

@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ I SEE IT MORE AS A FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM

THE OBSERVER DOES NOT HAVE TO BE HUMAN

THUS THE ACT OF OBSERVATION LINKS OBSERVER AND OBSERVED

Have you considered that needing to find novelty is driven by the collapse of that particular medium? They try to find something unique because they came in at a point at which everything which could be said has been said, in terms of diminishing returns? Also that the intellectualizing has removed all the mystery of the genre itself and with that, anything to explore.

So you mean the vestments of science on humanist philosophy @-A?

THIS IN TURN IMPLIES IDEALISM: INTERACTION IS A RESULT OF PRESENCE/RESPONSE TO SOMETHING, NOT MATERIALITY PER SE

I object to that popular science propaganda shit too

wait dearth of skill? Dude, plenty of people who can't play for shit made good music

@diversity_is_racism yeah that's what I was saying minus idealism

@profagonist It at the very least seems to give the impression that it is more widespread that it should be. Maybe it isn't.

But I took out observation

https://www.reddit.com/r/askaconservative/comments/5v7eg3/is_deep_ecology_a_conservative_philosophy/

@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ ALSO SKILL CAN MEAN LISTENING

SOME ARE SKILLED MUSICIANS BY OUTLOOK, NOT ACTUAL MECHANICS

THE IDEALISM IS ESSENTIAL

IF INTERACTION LINKS THINGS, THERE IS NO DECONSTRUCTION

AND

@diversity_is_racism Why does there HAVE to be an observer at all? I don't understand because it seems like it is a conclusion that is just leapt to for no reason other than to uphold the idea that obervation leads to event.

ALL OF THE UNIVERSE ACTS AS A LARGE CALCULATION

I'm still coming across good rap and electronic releases but it's easy to see that it takes more and more effort for only marginal returns.

@-A THAT IS HOW MOST UNDERSTAND IT: "OBSERVATION LEADS TO EVENT" TRANS. TO "INTENT => EVENT"

@diversity_is_racism Okay, that observation must lead to occurence?

intentionality

not really observation

Hence the perturbation

Being the clash of intentions

@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ They can at least understand what good music is. That is a skill in and of itself apparently. With the collapse of a medium because all has been said, the beauty of music is that you don't need words (such as the electronica you keep coming by, which I also like) so sure, the words have been said but has the sound been made? Maybe, maybe not. When there is this impression you want to express, it encourages creativity. Maybe it will be nothing new save for the order or how long ago it was done? Maybe it will be completely new. One's inner model leads to creativity.

I disagree that there is anything to understand about "good" music.

Since what we experience is aesthetic

I think you underestimate the degree to which your inner model is dependent upon the cultural model you were born into

Meh. Maybe. I just think theorizing leads to impression and impression leads to expression and that this could at least make for new creation. Some will be good, some will not.

It's almost always the other way around and that's as true of music as it is of broader cultural trends. They always start out more visceral, irrational and maybe a bit simplistic and end up abstract, rational, ornate.

But

The key here

Is that the second "phase" is derived from the first

Look what people did in response to death metal? They went primitive as hell with black metal

What happened in rock after prog

punk came out

Where does this visceral quality come from? One of those things that can't be known?

immediate experience

Therefore, the emotions that these experiences make? A reflection of these experiences?

it's more than emotion isn't it

Could we have the flairs from /r/askaconservative/ on /r/new_right plus a few additional ones e.g NRX TRP MRA MGTOW DE etc?

@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ Sure. But emotion and intellect are the core of art. The desire to create and to reflect on nature or even their own ideas.

@redpillavatar in art? Or on the chat?

on Reddit

Nah the intellect is responsible for abstract concepts

An important feature of early artistic movements is that those who were around routinely attest to "not knowing what to call it, in those days"

So they lack anything grounded in abstract concepts like "black metal" or "punk"

Ergo, not intellectual

The intuition more than the intellect. The intuition makes for a great modelling mechanism and internal impressions.

The intuition isn't a modeler