general

Discord ID: 267086373285134338


257,056 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 635/1029 | Next

2017-08-16 16:45:57 UTC

dont feed him

2017-08-16 16:56:28 UTC

-declines the test-

2017-08-16 17:11:59 UTC

the unfollow feature on facebook is great

2017-08-16 17:12:05 UTC

similarly, the block on discord

2017-08-16 17:12:33 UTC

it's like editing reality

2017-08-16 17:12:44 UTC

by manipulating perception

DAE suffocation?

2017-08-16 18:38:30 UTC

❤ SUFFOCATION ❤

2017-08-16 18:38:47 UTC

ALTHOUGH I AM STILL IN LOVE WITH "EFFIGY OF THE FORGOTTEN"

2017-08-16 18:38:50 UTC

EARLY DEATH METAL RULES

2017-08-16 19:10:15 UTC

yeah block on facebook is good

2017-08-16 19:10:26 UTC
2017-08-16 19:10:33 UTC

its really short

2017-08-16 19:13:06 UTC

no

2017-08-16 19:16:39 UTC

why not

2017-08-16 19:19:31 UTC

please do it @rebekka888

2017-08-16 19:19:46 UTC

nope

2017-08-16 19:20:07 UTC

why not

2017-08-16 19:21:05 UTC

why wont you @rebekka888

2017-08-16 19:23:06 UTC

because i dont want to

2017-08-16 19:23:12 UTC

why not though

2017-08-16 19:23:16 UTC

its so short

2017-08-16 19:23:31 UTC

because i do not care to take a short test

2017-08-16 19:23:38 UTC

I would appreciate it

2017-08-16 19:23:47 UTC

i do not care

2017-08-16 19:24:01 UTC

alright then

2017-08-16 19:34:04 UTC

see fallot

2017-08-16 19:39:08 UTC

see what

2017-08-16 19:39:29 UTC

no, I dont think its that

2017-08-16 19:39:35 UTC

but point taken

MBTI strikes me as psuedoscience

2017-08-16 19:47:55 UTC

it is, its magic

Thank you for your honesty

2017-08-16 19:51:42 UTC

I do sometimes think this album is better than Effigy

2017-08-16 19:52:43 UTC

I still think some of the pseudoscience claims are predicated on a belief that MBTI is supposed to be predictive

2017-08-16 19:53:58 UTC

most critics aren't pushing refined methodology criticisms

2017-08-16 19:54:02 UTC

its too much effort to tease apart the whole mess underlying such statements with every interaction

2017-08-16 19:54:54 UTC

between the INTs

2017-08-16 19:55:03 UTC

on the P side you get "can I confirm it"

2017-08-16 19:55:11 UTC

but on the J side the concerns are more

2017-08-16 19:55:19 UTC

"is it true" and "is it useful"

2017-08-16 19:55:23 UTC

truth-o-meter comes built in

2017-08-16 19:55:47 UTC

well I agree it's better to look at the whole thing as magic, especially in the hermetic sense

2017-08-16 19:55:50 UTC

of that word

2017-08-16 19:55:59 UTC

yeah, that's how I mean it

2017-08-16 19:56:00 UTC

sorcery

2017-08-16 19:56:02 UTC

alchemy

2017-08-16 19:56:11 UTC

yeah

Breeding the Spawn is their creative peak.

2017-08-16 19:57:41 UTC

@fallot So which is the best test to take?

2017-08-16 19:57:57 UTC

I remember you linked m e some months ago but I can't remember their names

2017-08-16 19:58:28 UTC

I agree it is their creative peak

2017-08-16 19:58:47 UTC

@Spinal the test I linked before is the one I now ask people to take

2017-08-16 19:58:56 UTC

it has some advantages, overall I remain displeased with testing

2017-08-16 19:59:21 UTC

there is no best test, there are only good test takers

2017-08-16 19:59:31 UTC

some types type themselves easily

2017-08-16 20:00:15 UTC

some types (not MBTI) may not have sufficient insight, personal honesty, or take the test seriously enough

2017-08-16 20:00:59 UTC

Ok

2017-08-16 20:01:04 UTC

Effigy is probably still the better album

2017-08-16 20:01:10 UTC

you're not very ambiguous Spinal

2017-08-16 20:01:18 UTC

unless you found the designation to be jarring

2017-08-16 20:01:47 UTC

You mean my results?

2017-08-16 20:02:06 UTC

I've found that one's results with the MBTI change with age.

2017-08-16 20:02:52 UTC

That's interesting, and seems reasonable

2017-08-16 20:03:02 UTC

yes, your results

2017-08-16 20:03:08 UTC

your results can change with age due to personal growth

2017-08-16 20:03:11 UTC

your type doesn't change

2017-08-16 20:03:31 UTC

if your type changes

2017-08-16 20:03:34 UTC

MBTI is worthless

2017-08-16 20:03:45 UTC

Hmmm. Aren't results and type tied together?

2017-08-16 20:04:03 UTC

there's a lot of room to mistype

2017-08-16 20:04:18 UTC

I think best results for reproducibility

2017-08-16 20:04:21 UTC

are like 0.7

2017-08-16 20:04:25 UTC

@fallot I wasn't planning on taking further tests, just curious

2017-08-16 20:04:34 UTC

in that case yes, best as far as I am concerned

It is magic and therefore subjective. How much worth does it have in explaining a person's psychology?

2017-08-16 20:04:49 UTC

I think a lot

2017-08-16 20:05:00 UTC

there is nothing comparable

2017-08-16 20:05:14 UTC

it can give you a holistic insight into many different aspects of a person's behaviour

2017-08-16 20:05:16 UTC

motivations etc.

2017-08-16 20:05:38 UTC

@fallot Do you know who else got the same type?

2017-08-16 20:05:40 UTC

My impulses are different from what I actually do

2017-08-16 20:05:42 UTC

it takes a little time to see the descriptions as something more than the sum of their parts

2017-08-16 20:05:43 UTC

i thought this server got shoah'd?

2017-08-16 20:05:46 UTC

or was that fake news

2017-08-16 20:05:50 UTC

because I try to patch up my weaknesses

2017-08-16 20:05:52 UTC

it didn't, but there was some danger of it

it need only be sufficiently vague so as to allow persons to have ah-ha moments. Functionally equivalent with horoscopes or palm readers.

2017-08-16 20:06:06 UTC

I hear that criticism often

2017-08-16 20:06:09 UTC

it doesn't really stand

2017-08-16 20:06:24 UTC

there's a big difference between reading a horoscope (which I've never found to have any value)

2017-08-16 20:06:25 UTC

My experience has been that as I matured and changed the quality of my thinking, my behavior changed and so did my MBTI results.

2017-08-16 20:06:27 UTC

and reading your MBTI profile

2017-08-16 20:06:28 UTC

@pashtun fake news

2017-08-16 20:06:33 UTC

while can seem like your mind if being read or something

2017-08-16 20:06:49 UTC

what is your MBTI @Claire

2017-08-16 20:07:00 UTC

@Spinal , you are an INTJ right?

2017-08-16 20:07:15 UTC

me, @UOC , maybe this @༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ guy though he could be INTP as well

2017-08-16 20:07:16 UTC

One thing that doesn't seem to change are a person's aptitudes. I've taken the Johnson O'Connor tests and those still hold true today.

2017-08-16 20:07:17 UTC
2017-08-16 20:07:23 UTC

@fallot iirc I got what they called INTJ-A

2017-08-16 20:07:31 UTC

that's just the bullshit of a certain website

2017-08-16 20:07:45 UTC

Alright

2017-08-16 20:07:58 UTC

@fallot I don't even remember anymore. I've jotted them down somewhere. I took them a number of years apart and promptly dismissed them.

2017-08-16 20:08:22 UTC

why dont you take it now

What is a quanifiable difference between horoscopes and MBTI so that I may determine whether or not you are making truth statements rather than value judgements?

2017-08-16 20:08:46 UTC

I can't give you anything like that

2017-08-16 20:08:51 UTC

the best thing would be

2017-08-16 20:08:53 UTC

experience it yourself

2017-08-16 20:09:04 UTC

do the test, find out your type, then read a type profile

2017-08-16 20:09:10 UTC

which I will link you a few of when you do the test

2017-08-16 20:09:19 UTC

then you can make up your mind how vague or specific it is

2017-08-16 20:09:39 UTC

I may trust planets that have been around for billions of years and their influence on me before I trust the MBTI.

2017-08-16 20:10:08 UTC

@fallot It is very interesting, I'll give you that.

That would seem to validate my criticism.

2017-08-16 20:10:56 UTC

Truth be told, I remember being impressed with the accuracy of the MBTI.

2017-08-16 20:11:21 UTC

but what was your criticism @༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻

2017-08-16 20:11:26 UTC

I don't, however, think it is some permanent assessment of me and my thinking.

2017-08-16 20:11:28 UTC

it is already validated

2017-08-16 20:11:50 UTC

don't decide its relevance before the fact @Claire

2017-08-16 20:12:03 UTC

its a permanent assessment that you are a woman

2017-08-16 20:12:07 UTC

that means something about your cognition

2017-08-16 20:12:15 UTC

why can there not be other similar categories?

2017-08-16 20:13:01 UTC

Wait. It's a gender determiner?

it appears validated in the same sense that I might claim to be able to throw a rock into 30 foot diameter hole.

*of course*

2017-08-16 20:13:42 UTC

@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ what are you trying to say

2017-08-16 20:13:45 UTC

that MBTI is bullshit?

Yes.

2017-08-16 20:13:54 UTC

Yes, being female does mean that I think differently. So does my IQ.

2017-08-16 20:13:54 UTC

I can't give you anything to make you see it is or isn't

2017-08-16 20:14:00 UTC

except you going through the process

2017-08-16 20:14:02 UTC

because its subjective

2017-08-16 20:14:27 UTC

there may be other aspects similarly unalterable about a person

2017-08-16 20:14:31 UTC

an MBTI type is a very broad thing though

2017-08-16 20:14:50 UTC

I'll never be a people person, no matter how much I grow

I feel as if a sufficiently naive person visiting a palm reader would say something similar.

2017-08-16 20:15:00 UTC

my 5 month old baby is obiousvly not a people person

2017-08-16 20:15:11 UTC

@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ you are not coming at this the right way

2017-08-16 20:15:16 UTC

you're trying to debunk

2017-08-16 20:15:27 UTC

all I can say to what you say is "I guess?"

2017-08-16 20:15:31 UTC

@fallot Look, I'm not trying to poo on the MBTI. I'm just not sure that its results are as immutable as you claim.

2017-08-16 20:15:45 UTC

yes I understand, I dont mind if you do that anyway

2017-08-16 20:15:57 UTC

what I said is, if the results are mutable

2017-08-16 20:16:03 UTC

the whole thing is fundamentally worthless, nonexistent

2017-08-16 20:16:07 UTC

Then I misunderstood.

2017-08-16 20:16:07 UTC

Fallot but address this

2017-08-16 20:16:26 UTC

I'll never be a people person, but I see the value in people skills and work to develop them because it seems like a weakness in myself

Falsification is valid.

2017-08-16 20:17:00 UTC

yes but you're missing the whole point and value of it

2017-08-16 20:17:14 UTC

there are many things in life we simply take for granted

2017-08-16 20:17:20 UTC

to which you will never apply this level of scrutiny

2017-08-16 20:17:34 UTC

trust your intuition

you are dodging

2017-08-16 20:17:39 UTC

do it, and see what you think

2017-08-16 20:17:41 UTC

oh come on.

2017-08-16 20:17:44 UTC

I already told you

2017-08-16 20:17:52 UTC

that I can give you nothing

2017-08-16 20:17:59 UTC

so what can I dodge?

2017-08-16 20:19:23 UTC

what am I to do with myself? I can't decide. Should we be counter signalling nazi's when they are probably inevitable regardless of any effort? Are they just inevitble development of lower class right wing aingst?

2017-08-16 20:19:39 UTC

@UOC I dont understand what to address

2017-08-16 20:20:04 UTC

don't "counter signal" just don't be a nazi

You said: "there are many things in life we simply take for granted. to which you will never apply this level of scrutiny"

Be that as it may, such statements are dodges.

2017-08-16 20:20:23 UTC

again, you missed the point

2017-08-16 20:20:28 UTC

I started out saying, I can offer you nothing

2017-08-16 20:20:40 UTC

then you said "falsification is valid", of course its valid

2017-08-16 20:20:45 UTC

@charles watson "Are they just inevitble development of lower class right wing aingst?"

2017-08-16 20:20:45 UTC

who is questioning its validity?

2017-08-16 20:20:50 UTC

Interesting question.

2017-08-16 20:20:52 UTC

all I said is it has value

2017-08-16 20:20:59 UTC

MBTI that is

2017-08-16 20:21:13 UTC

but its subjective, so you wont be able to see for yourself until you get into it a bit

2017-08-16 20:21:21 UTC

what's counter-signaling? am I doing that?

2017-08-16 20:21:22 UTC

I can't "show you" anything beyond that

You said: "you are not coming at this the right way."

2017-08-16 20:21:30 UTC

I'm just wondering how to answer MBTI questions accurately

2017-08-16 20:21:40 UTC

I assume that "this" is an attempt to find out more about the subject

2017-08-16 20:21:47 UTC

as your starting point is "this isn't valid"

2017-08-16 20:21:54 UTC

and mine is "I can't make you think any different from that"

2017-08-16 20:21:57 UTC

@charles watson It seems that WN1.0 appeals to those who missed out on it the first time around. It may also appeal because it's simple. Simple messages for simple people.

say I have taken the test, investigated the type description and found the information to be inaccurate. What then?

2017-08-16 20:22:25 UTC

then I imagine you will confirm your opinions

2017-08-16 20:22:40 UTC

but insights I have gained through MBTI remain

2017-08-16 20:22:43 UTC

so I will retain mine

2017-08-16 20:22:50 UTC

its impossible to "disprove" MBTI to me

2017-08-16 20:22:53 UTC

it can only be refined

2017-08-16 20:23:08 UTC

a natural democratic result. You give the proles power in society, there understanding of a greater order is there, but limited

2017-08-16 20:23:35 UTC

on the other hand

2017-08-16 20:23:40 UTC

maybe you will find the information

2017-08-16 20:23:43 UTC

not to be "accurate"

2017-08-16 20:23:45 UTC

Democracy is death.

2017-08-16 20:23:48 UTC

but to be insightful, valuable

2017-08-16 20:23:55 UTC

(also accurate)

It would appear that if both of our findings can be correct then that poses as issue for MBTI

2017-08-16 20:24:36 UTC

yeah, sure

2017-08-16 20:25:08 UTC

while you could be a number of types, INTPs are those with this level of skepticism

2017-08-16 20:25:09 UTC

a problem that assumes consistency is a pre-requisite for validity

2017-08-16 20:25:11 UTC

generally

2017-08-16 20:25:27 UTC

I think its pretty much a given you are an INTx

2017-08-16 20:25:45 UTC

INTJ's = MasterRace

2017-08-16 20:26:15 UTC

is the truth not true if it isn't confirmable?

bring a wide enough net to an area in which fish are known to congregate and I am sure you will catch something

2017-08-16 20:26:42 UTC

but why throw stones from outside

2017-08-16 20:26:46 UTC

when you could see for yourself

2017-08-16 20:26:47 UTC

come in

2017-08-16 20:27:10 UTC

Personally, I don't like being quantified by some test.

2017-08-16 20:27:21 UTC

like an IQ test?

2017-08-16 20:27:26 UTC

all these criticisms are resting on unstated assumptions. You guys seem to be differing on what you think the test is supposed to reveal

I would caution against assuming the experience of others in conversation.

2017-08-16 20:27:39 UTC

tests are reconition of pattern, not the whole

2017-08-16 20:27:42 UTC

well I mean

2017-08-16 20:27:44 UTC

you could just tell me

2017-08-16 20:27:47 UTC

*recognition

2017-08-16 20:27:59 UTC

I will assume away in good faith

2017-08-16 20:28:13 UTC

until proven otherwise

2017-08-16 20:28:30 UTC

@༺པརབྱར།བསངཇ༻ , after all that buddy you've GOT to take the test

2017-08-16 20:28:43 UTC

@charles watson This could explain why Asians score so high on IQ tests but act like robots without inspiration.

2017-08-16 20:29:58 UTC

relinked for convenience.

2017-08-16 20:30:08 UTC

and cheating on tests also

I have taken these tests and investigated these types only to find the results wanting

2017-08-16 20:31:20 UTC

there's a lot of issues with most of the stuff online

2017-08-16 20:31:32 UTC

let me be your guide, if you end up in the same spot

2017-08-16 20:31:35 UTC

so be it

2017-08-16 20:31:57 UTC

that's the worst that could happen anyway

2017-08-16 20:32:22 UTC

the computer tests are aparently dubious

My mother paid a professional to administer an MBTI test when I was 13.

2017-08-16 20:33:10 UTC

useless

2017-08-16 20:33:25 UTC

testing 13 year olds wouldn't even be in-universe ethical

2017-08-16 20:33:41 UTC

I have my own ideas about that but

What possessed her?

to do such a thing

2017-08-16 20:34:14 UTC

it was popular among business types

2017-08-16 20:34:27 UTC

are you an upper middle class striver sort of family?

2017-08-16 20:34:41 UTC

either that or asian

I am Laotian.

2017-08-16 20:35:42 UTC

of chinese descent?

ummm I do believe so yes.

2017-08-16 20:37:08 UTC

did they leave Laos around 1975?

That period of my family's history is fog to me but it must have been around that time.

2017-08-16 20:37:53 UTC

there's your answer I guess

2017-08-16 20:37:55 UTC

tiger mom

Crouching tiger mom in my case kek

2017-08-16 20:38:28 UTC

fallot what do you think about birth order

2017-08-16 20:38:44 UTC

I've been thinking about that recently

2017-08-16 20:38:51 UTC

I think its important but there may be some other hidden factor

2017-08-16 20:38:53 UTC

compounding the matter

257,056 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 635/1029 | Next