That's what you get for showing your face man.

whenever you take a product like wikipedia

check it's filters

what kind of people does it attract ?

who does it filter out ?

have you been dox'd for real @devolved ?

wikipedia selects for people who are not tired to google out enough sources for their claims which could vary from newspaper articles to websites

yep, for real.

who did it?

wikipedia serves to confirm mainstream and present it as "objectivity"

quite a complete bio released by antifa

does devolved have a presence on social networks ?

yep

big mistake

link to your twitter/gab ?

I guess the museum episode didn't help either

were you involved?

yes

sec

lots going on right now

so @devolved did they discover you are jewish or what ?

ir was it just "meh"

they found out i'm mormon

compromising lvl 4/10

dead chats today

http://i.imgur.com/hJaFBKc.jpg

Is that made by a evangelical denomination somewhere inside USA

Oliver Cromwel was a dalit though

fallot

I need to ask you a medical scenario question

wheew

just finished recording piano part for my song left to do automate the modular synthesizer 20 minutes per session due to trial limitation

i left the hardest part for the end as a proper procastrinator

btw what EXACTLY happened with youtube ads that everybody is talking about it

did they just reduce amount of money peoople receive for ads ?

almost half a year ago i concluded the only way to make money online would soon be basically donations

which means that people with modest incomes will donate to other people with modest incomes basically circulating money

transfers vertically between classes will become smaller and smaller

people who do interesting stuff online are basically drifters

people who donate to them are also drifters, with ocasional upper middle class people of wealthy origins

ranks are really getting tightened globally

rich people are only looking how to get more rich and nothing beyond that, people of modest livings are trying to avoid spending money and look for free alternatives, and low iq working classes basically trade their kidney for fashionable gadgets

@The Enlightened Shepherd how was cromwell a dalit?

dalit's don't win

cromwell won

and conquered ireland as he had balls

to just kill every potatoe who haggled him about money

and potatoes

and how he was enlgish and they don't like the english

He conquered Ireland to spread stupid ideas like protestantism, politics and business interests

He was a politician

a commie

proto-whig

a pleb

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4468954/Man-spends-25k-plastic-surgery-elf.html

what's up @Deleted User 57835c2c

the real story should be the surgeons who did it

True

Sup @fallot

Why so quiet today

have I been quiet?

Seems like it

oh, I didn't say a lot in here

I see

oh hey

I got linked a video about freemasons

I really think you should watch it, but it is like an hour long

totally worth it I thought

indirectly links to vigilant citizen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvUNRekfEE8

Kkk

Bretts been silent too

howdy boys

howdy

BRETT IS RUBBING HANDS

@diversity_is_racism What exactly is APLH

Sounds very interesting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gfIgA-PYyQ

SORRY GENTS

VERY BUSY THIS WEEK

APLH = ASSOCIATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE LEBANESE HERITAGE

A BUNCH OF TRADITIONALISTS FOCUSED MOSTLY ON CITY DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend/11056/sutliff-tobacco-company-match-royal-yacht

@diversity_is_racism why is cotton-picking @devolved an admin in here?

Who is Mr fox?

I'm guessing cause he is doing some real life alt-right stuff @spaceplacenta

i'm the only person in here who actually reads amerika.org

i read it too

I came here through one of the many outliers

Is anybody here reading Curt Doolittle's blog? Propertarianism.com

@The Enlightened Shepherd are you 'Forest Fire'?

No ?

What is Forest Fire ?

oh, sorry, just one random blogger who made me think of you, this guy: https://changeofseasblog.wordpress.com/

the alt-right may involve similar types of people, I think

2 things are ruining my physique

1. sitting in a chari a lot

2. my inability to gain weight which take a toll on my chest primarily

my chest are good, but i want them more broad and bigger but i cannot gain a gram of weight

i can be force fed by the bucketloads and i wont gain a single kilo

and im a guy who has been doing incessantly push ups and pull ups since his elementary school, weight lifting for last 5 years

but aftera point, my chest simply stopped gaining and that's it

i grew my forearms, my legs, everything

I went into the muslim chat and drew an ascii Mohammed

I've never been banned faster in my life

i went into the gym this night, saw 5 dudes who managed to take up 30 pieces of equipment

i undressed back and went out, the girl at he counter asked me what happened

i told her i dont have time for this shit

People like me need space and calm

Everything is full of people who emit all kind of subconscious signals in form of strange body and eye movements

who manage to always be in the way

people are neurotic

i cannot even go to the bakery and ask for a croissant without the vendor simply doing or saying something excessive

something completely unnecessary

some angry gesture or dumb questions

no i dont want another handkerchief or a plastic spoon

young people act like apes

im on the verge of moving to my house from this appartment and subject myself to activity that i hate which is driving a car, only to allow myself some breathing space from people and their neuroticism

Are you friends with exilarch yet

MODERN SOCIETY IS RETARDED

EVERYONE WANTS ESCAPE

AT SOME LEVEL

@diversity_is_racism , why am I not metal?

I'm easily one of the most metal people here

@devolved where is exilarch lately

we need latest dietary input

@Hagel you are in the metal subgroup

wireframe_sunset is at it again on Gab

the best combination of protestant upbringing, libertarianism and conspiracy theories possible

@The Enlightened Shepherd Plebeians ruin everything by their mere existence, especially if the social fabric in which they swim and which manufactures their behavior is build by subhuman animals and not the natural elite of our people. The modern cities are especially bad, from being the cultural stars transformed into nothing more than iq shredders, collections of the lowest scum of the world

It has only today, since I spent basically the whole day outside, that it kind of struck me lately how peope are excessive in their entire being

It's as if they at no point feel good about themselves, constantly moving themselves into irrational motions and behaviors

It's hard to call your average meatblib any more conscious or self-aware than a dog or trained horse

People live totally unexamined lives by and large

people are apes dude

the ape that decides to sharpen a stick to spear the ant mound instead of just fishing in it for termites is more adventurous than the average person. The average person is not the kid that decides to built a hut in the woods when he's 10 with an axe.

So they can play castle with toy swords and sticks in a hut they just built with a real ax

Rome looked like a typical stucco italian town until Augustus decided marble was cool.

Was Nero Alt-Right

discuss

All the very smart people I know do not breed

Every retard that i see on TV or internet has a family

Throughout History it was only a small elite of people that through their genetic predisposition and the position of their birth were capable to transcendent the mere vegetative state of existence giving meaning to their lives and by doing their small part meaining to the lives of the plebeians

@The Enlightened Shepherd Geniuses are outbred by design

@The Enlightened Shepherd I think most of these guys know that to continue what they started it's better to hand it off to someone that knows how to run it that's not a complete stooge or some idiot teenager.

Dynastic succession always fails

Dynastic succession only fails if the elite breeds with inferiors

See Nero and Caligula being the "most related" of the Julio-Claudians

no it always fails eventually

The Egyptian Pharaos maintained the purity of their blood

for dynastic succession to work you basically need to die when you're 50-70 years old

and have a 20-40 year old son

We must remember that some of these civilizations lasted an enormous amount of time

who can run everything like you do

People shrug of 5000 years as if it was a couple of election cycles

no they didn't dude, their political structures imploded all the time

"yeah it came and it collapsed because they failed" 5000 YEARS

they just replaced them with new ones that worked

instead of pretending that the wold ones worked

Yes but think of the culture, language, territory

Because they bred with inferiors i believe that the elites were not your normal homo sapiens, check out melonheads, thal sapiesn hybrids

Remarkably persistent for such a long long time

Egypt was although i nsuch a position that it was very isolated and secluded

egypt also got fucked tons of times

But again, what about India, China, Japan

and the pharoahs were mostly idiots

I don't buy that

so why did threy have so many dynasties?

@Death Strike's Bat Well if they were idiots how could they maintain their rulership for literally thousands of years

Almost every monarchy did have many dynasties

who are they?

pharoah is just a title

monarchy works

Funny

I'm trying to remember if any monarchy had one single dynastyto rule it for 1000 years or more

probably not

japan

but not raelly

Did they pass thr 1k mark ?

habsburg

I don't think they did

they're about 1500 or so years old

but the Shoguns are monarchs in all buy name

but name

Habsburgs are almost there, but not quite

they were founded in 12th century or what ?

yeah and there are multiple hapsburgs

Russia had two, Rurkids and Romanovs

well...

sort of

hohenzollern, wittelsbach

Russian Tsars after peter weren't russian

weren't really russian

None were technically Russian

Neither was Peter

They spoke Russian sure

Peter was a Romanov, the Romanovs were of Russian origin

his dynasty just fell apart and was replaced by another family also named romanov

due to his fucked up personal life and killing his own son

and putting his illiterate second wife on the throne

and basically giving his second wife to his best friend

People like to generalize and assume history is neat and tidy

or that primogeniture actually works when half the time it is a glorious fuck up

It's not necessary that it works perfectly at all

like William I -> William II -> Henry I -> Stephen / Mathilda -> Henry II

I dont consider these to be fuck ups

William II, Stephen, amd Mathilda were massive fuck ups

Nothing works perfectly

They are massive fuck ups

Stephen and Matilda worse than William II

Some Monarchs are bad but Monarchy is always good

Yes technically, the original Romanovs can be considered the only Russian rulers of Russia, though their origins are unknown, they could be semi-Rurkids

They could be

or they could be someone picked off the street

like Menshikov

to do some job

The purpose of Monarchy is to eliminaet egalitarianism and demotism and promote aristocracy

If you have a strong aristocracy and weaponized militia even a bad one cant do too much damage you should look what happened to tyrans most of the time time they were physicaly removed by their own family members

Everything that goes wrong in the government is to be fixed and life goes on

that is not the definition of monarchy

strong monarchs do not like aristocrats with actual power

they prefer to be absolute

They would be absolute on paper

We are yet to witness an absolute monarchy where the aristocracy was not in a position to shape ideas, aesthetics, policies and life in general

Yes we have

William I

We don't need aristocrats to be clerks

Augustus

That is not their natural position

Being a clerk is counter-definition of aristocracy

Henry VII, Henry VIII, Elizabeth I

Hey, Elizabeth was great

And apart from TV shows, Henry VIII was a popular ruler

Aristoracy isn't there to manage the state, though it can occupy *leading* positions in military business and politics

Aristocracy is there to be the best part of society and produce the best possible products of culture for society

But what if the King is the king as he has the biggest army and he has the biggest army as he's the King of the Peasants?

like many medieval English kings

and Roman emperors

Social stratification of society was still strong in Imperial Rome

The Roman Emperors were populares against the aristocracy

it can be easily deduced from criminal law

where noble men were still drastically more leniently punihed than lower class people

There is social stratification but the Emperor can take wealth away at will

he can put new people in those positions

though it is true that trend was moving towards more equalitarian model, where noble people were losing their status and dignity

and give them those names

As he's the head of hte post-Marian reform army

which governs all rural life

and is the rural economy

so he is basically the economic and social bastion of the 90% of the population that lives outside of the cities