looks like a drug user

auschwitz arms

Her the lighting and the sun was good, if we exclude the part where she stops interpreting other people and starts developing her own idea

interpreting otthers is valuable too

sounds like you just don't like her

You don't like somebody you have met

I can throw a rock at a crowd in northern Europe and find a prettier girl

you are an autist

I'm not a huge fan of her writting

But it's readable

I am just not a fan of ugly girls

pretty girls only

You haven't been to Northern Europe recently

I like russian girls and scandi

Russian and Ukrainian girls are hands down the most beautiful

However

They all get fat after marriage

you've been warned

i like women with deep and mysterious eyes

I am already married

My wife is russian and Icelandic aka perfect, and she is naturally skinny and I keep her fit

http://www.savitridevi.org/images/photo-passport17.jpg

Ossian

*lesbian

late Ruslana Korshunova had almost completely grey eyes

http://z3.ifrm.com/67/29/0/p460603/600full_ruslana_korshunova.jpg

Hit

Hot

slavic moonface

She killed herself by leaping from a skyscraper

Quality

Russian women are always fatalistic ❤

Good

She died young and pretty

Emotionally damaged and requiring a Nazi s&m relationship is the best way to go

I'll keep that in mind

"You may now collar the bride"

can your son do pullups whilst chatting on irc with his other hand yet

No

give him a few months

how come you're ok with yarfy crapping on christians all day if you are one

Mormons are not normal Christians at all

And Mormons are not 1% as hardass as the book or our early prophets say to be

The new testament I think is 75% Roman lies

reading all the Mormon books without the new testament completely removes the "Jesus as king dalit" vibe

Instead it is almost entirely the "sack Jericho, kill everyone and even the livestock, and do not even take their gold" Jesus

Then you add Joseph Smith and Brigham Young and it becomes white power polygamy and anti government survivalism

have four wives, 3 kids each in the name of the 14 words and Hitler

Mormons basically look and behave like conformist second hand car salesmen

I despise that

The other half look like national traitors and Israel-loving sponges

they all get jobs selling solar panels or snooping for alphabet agencies

They entirely stopped being cool with the black priesthood heresy

That single event is where they stopped being white power polygamy cultists as far as I can tell

"they all get jobs selling solar panels or snooping for alphabet agencies" or starting multilevel marketing companies

romney lol

Yes

sales gimmicks, mlm,feds

all of those I find morally repulsive

salesmen are human pollution and I don't care who knows it

I almost wish Romney and Rick Perry would have ran together. Best quaffed hair ever.

you know that nordics have become lazy when swedes dont respond to your emails on saturday

Salesman. Bleh

I can't wait to be rich enough to get away with telling gays and promiscuous women that they deserve to be thrown from the rooftops

just right to their face

one admirable thing about Islam is the low tech, brutal punishments

I stopped caring about gays or promiscuous women some 3 years ago

Whether society comes or goes in general

scandinavians aren't far removed from gays

Scandinavia is just a geographical term nowdays

all the people i've met who had a scandinavian fetish were nomies or supercharged normies

the cool people fetishize slavs

Slavic countries are also infested with normies and progressively minded people

They only still act in a traditional way through reflexes

But remember, so did America in 90's

And today?

that's one interesting definition of 'traditional' you got there

Hongaria will become a holy ground for people like us

those on the know know that america from the start was a liberal program overthrowing the dvine right of the aristocracy and thereby setting the stage for anal sex and global warming. isn't that right @diversity_is_racism

if Orban will stay president... If they don't elect a faggot

Hong aria

America, speaking of a state

Always, since it's foundation

Acted on a global stage as some sort of vigillante, throwing out the rulebook and considering itself innovator and young

how did it throw out a rulebook

Much of it was based in it's demographic strenght, but much of it also due to ignorance that is always inherent in a population of people who posses strenght but are unaccustomed

nations always invade others for their own uses

america just pretends it's doing it as a favor

However, America has still, to this day, kept this spirit

Of being a vigillante nation

Remember, America is the only country in the world

America is a dixie quadroon shit hole

That practices forcing other nations to arrest their cizens, extradite them to America, where they are tried under laws of country they have no relation to, for crimes it has no right to judge them, and then imprison them on her own soil

Which is by definition kidnapping

Why ? Because it can

Also wars

American tourists

American wars are not pure national self interest, of acquiring space and resources, but rather an enterprise of vigillantes, like piracy

Because piracy was utterly unpatriotic

everything is bad. only the intangible fantasy shit I imagine is good

They use piracy with green bills

Jamestown had blacks

America does not conquer, America robs

they can print their own bills

America was dalit from day one

they give it to jerks that have ressources

People compare American wars to colonization which is insult to countries who had colonies

jerks have money, they are happy, and all is fine

The liberals are right, America was never great, they are just wrong about why

Not really

America vassalised us, west europeans

Western Europe begged on her knees for America to enrich her

after WW2

Western Europe was eager to be Americanized

America was pedestalized in Europe since 19th century

Yes, Europe was like a suburban kid being desperate to be black, becoming a wigger

Europe became tourism country

Europeans sort of imagined themselves in position to use their "sophistication" and vast American resources and potential to make some kind of perfect match

in 19th, Europeans countries were powerful

But in reality, Europeans only wanted welfare state, decolonization and negrification = less responsibility

European reflex in relation to America was "Dear Lord, let's transfer our responsibilities accross the pond"

"We need, to decolonize ? Good, just keep an eye on our safety and shit"

Sometimes, even though Americans complain about it for all the wrong reasons

They are right when they callit European "rot"

Post-revolution europeans

Because that's how Europeans perceived themselves, as geriatric, high tech shop clerks and wine tasters

the WW1 suicide of Europe was basically caused by French and German diplomacy

WW I was caused by the Germans

Europe was doomed with abolition of monarchy

Europe's response to consequences of war was equally childish and reeking of desire to avoid future responsibility

It was always "we must come closer and be loving and embracing so we don't have any wars"

It was never the consequence that naturally result from war, that is, subjugation and conquest and domination

The tragedy of WW I is only greater thanks to the almost incredible fact that Germany was able to start another war

Napoleon waged war accross Europe, the germans, as a consequence, formed the nation and took revenge in 1870, they reenacted the same policy during WW1 & WW2

these 2 countries depleted Europe

Which is solely fault of British stupidity and arrogance, and French incompetence

of a new system

abolition of monarchy

The fact that Germany wasn't fully and frontally invaded in 1939 while it was herself invading Poland, is notorious incompetence

kill of monarchs

"dalits" who get the power

And I'm not saying this out of malice towards Germans at all

This is just common sense

British always approched Germans with that senseof arrogance and completely unwarranted confidence

instead of an alliance with germans in 1940's

we chose war

Alliance was impossible

But Germany should've been invaded in 1939

Because France and Britain pledged to do so, and had responsibility to do so, in respect to their fallen in WW I and for the sake of sparring another generation of well born people of slaughter

France was a liberal country with a fucked up government

Soviet Union was ironically, the last saving grace for Britain and France

Britain, i don't know, but they didn't xant wxar too

Because all the millions killed in the east would have had to fall in the west instead

Soviet Union just fucked up Europe

They even counted on this scenario

Yes they didn't want war

That's what kid says when he must go do a chore "I don't want tooooo"

Reality is, consequences were clear

Consequences of lack of proper response to another German agression

i don't put the fault on them defense

but the fact is

It is well known that only complete fools get tricked with same trick twice (pre-emptive invasion through Belgium)

soviet union fucked up europe

Even greater and even more impossible fact

in fact, the fault is hitler's

is that British and France *planned in advance* that they will defend again in northern france and will repeat WW I

Which is utterly horrific

and deeper in fact, the fault is french's Traité de Versailles

You pledge to repeat the same completely flawed strategy because last time it ended with your pyrrhic victory

France didn't accept reality, tactitians were uncompetant

And partake no pre-emptive action yourself

It's par exellence the type of burreaucratic thinking common to Europeans

"stick with what worked last time"

Soviet Union is the result of all of that

Hitler-Stalin pact is the result of French and British incompetence

Which would have never happened have they only pledged to invade Germany as soon as it reoccuppied Rhineland, or mess with a neighbouring nation

All the beggining is Napoleon

like said @Salt

They only had to pledge to do so, because Hitler would've never did all he did if he didn't observe complete lethargy

Well, Napoleon was in many ways a better leader than what followed

He was ambitious yes, but his "acts" were always backed up by rifles and boots

He was distrustful of burreaucracy

in Hearths of Iron 4, i invade earth cause it's cool

in the real world, this is stupid

Hitler paid too

like many other empires

Napoleon never really invaded countries just like that

It was a complex, but not entirely outrageous series of consecutive vents

events *

He left all major monarchies intact

In fact, he created some more, like Italy

Napoleon wanted for himself dominant spot in Europe and he wasn't the first or last European to try to do so

Napoleonic wars were mostly defensive, but the consequence was the spread of 1789's ideas

I don't really believe that Napoleon was agent of these ideas

Nor helped their proliferation

he was not, he stopped the mess in France, but he had some of it

His position towards revolution itself was entirely cynical

Funny thing is, while Stalin commited many great errors in his domestic rule

the human's rights was one of his prime ideas

He was way more serious in his foreign policy

Which was recognized by Hitler, who considered Stalin (he didnt directly say it) his greatest opponent

Not only due to the immediacy of their conflict

STALIN DID NOT SMOKE ROYAL YACHT

Americans were more powrful

IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER

STALIN SMOKED "HERZEGOVINA FLOR"

AND NEVER CLEANED HIS PIPES

But because he understood that Stalin "owed nothing to demagogy" (Hitler's words)

MR. MUNDUNGUS

DEMAGOGY => DEMOTISM

Stalin surely did make mistakes in his strategic thinking

But more importantly

He never forgave mistakes

That's why he was Hitler's ultimate enemy

And Britain's saving grace

Studying all of medicine for a big test son

soon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mG5ecRXELoY

I wonder, was the removal of the Turks in the Balkans a positive consequence of 1789 ideas or was it the result of something else?

KIM PHILBY = STALIN'S REVENGE ON UK

Removal of Turks was imminent

In fact, it's miraculous how Turks persisted for so long

Mostly thanks to British support

And Austrian caution towards Russia

But otherwise, Ottoman position was incredibly fragile and perilous

They pesisted only thanks to cunning in diplomacy, in their good fashion

The fact that it was defeated by Balkan League,and alliance of conscripted peasant armies, displayed how completely sub-standard was Ottoman force

It's society, the Muslim population, was weakened, soft, dwelled in towns, markets and dealed solely with trade and craft

It's officer corps drafted from that population, corrupt, ambitious, selfish and unpatriotic

Turkey rallied only in WW I

to become much better force

did the British supplied equipments? at that times the Ottoman were mostly agrarians

AFAIK Turks used mostly French and German equipment

But they had considerable manpower, and long history of conflict and experienced officer corps

How average Mormon looks like

https://youtu.be/TiXT8koTeas?t=1m24s

lame shirt that doesnt fit, on a lame physique, tucked into pants that dont fit, tied with a waist that doesnt fit

face that has given up on anything else besides office and subscription to cable TV

and betraying country

https://beefshield.bandcamp.com/album/the-deep-state-experience

I think that city living is anti-human, city-dwellers know nothing else than cities, and every cities of the world are the same, this is how you kill allegiance and you end up with males with gay haircuts and tight jeans, this is why I think infrastructures are more dangerous than ideology, they built themselves an universe removed from the world

http://www.amerika.org/politics/forging-a-perfect-conservatism/

http://www.deathmetal.org/out.cgi?http://www.cnn.com/

@Salt I agree and have been trying to get prozak to understand for years

Westerners think their happiness is one purchase away

That's what all boils down to

No identity

No real values or loyalties, only imagined stuff

They imagine what they value but in reality are as water, dissapearing without trace facing any trial or test

They refuse the only and most logical option that can improve them vastly