How have you not just BEGGED THE QUESTION

I can simply say, that the ultimate reality is allowed with the existence of a big spaghetti penis.

> Elaborate diction

https://www.facebook.com/uniladmag/videos/3574441822578851/

> Same arguments

i think im going to be sick

@buster ROOOOOAAAAAAASTED

Squishy? Did you watch some of it yet ?

The reason it can't do these things is because I define the nature of reality so

hey

who the FUCK

said we don't tolerate anime here?

Careful... @SmugAnimeGirl

Weebs got Trump elected

the revelation of @Snoo and @red

See how Trump does in 2020 if you alienate his weeb base

i have to eat dinner xd

the revelation of @Snoo and @red and @Alex the er... owl guy.

I would like to see Trump do his hair up like Goku

word spaghetti

I would like for Trump's hair to be erratic.

But I do like it in it's trivial form.

Every day it's something new?

the personal authoritative revelation of @Snoo and @red and @Alex the er... owl guy.

@Alex the er... owl guy. Yes.

I'd be happy with that

dont overtalk

😄

thats funny

imma use this

DONT OVERTALK ME

@red IF U BELIEVE IN THE FUCKING UNIFORMITY OF NATURE

@red THEN U BELIEVE IN SOMETHING WITHOUT PROOF

SO UR OWN CLAIM

IS WITHOUT PROOF

OR U JUST LIVE ON A CHEESE CAKE

@TYLER You have to assume the uniformity of nature before you can believe in God.

the personal authoritative revelation of @Snoo and @red and @Alex the er... owl guy.

@SmugAnimeGirl NO

ur proof is cuz god said

revelation

not cuz u said so

@TYLER Please tell me how one can come to believe in God without first assuming the uniformity of nature.

but its jerking off to theory

@TYLER Please tell me how you could convince a blubbering retard with no sense of reason why God exists.

wat

u cant

@TYLER Exactly.

@TYLER You don't realize that this is just word spaghetti?

so what

god is absolute and just , i can rely on a universal eternal standard of justice

One is claiming they know. The other isn't. Yes, both of those ideas are based off reality, but that doesn't make them synonymous.

@TYLER So you're using the uniformity of nature to justify God, putting you on the same level as the rest of us.

It's illogical word spaghetti

Jesus christ

they claim they know he is not real

so you are wrong

@SmugAnimeGirl im using revelation to the principles

of uniformity

you are not going to say you have no positive statements

YOU DO

causality

even design

Nope

and if you say you dont you are a liar

i would say

so you are a liar

"I don't know" is different from "I know"

@TYLER How can one read revelation without the uniformity of nature? How can one read or understand anything without operating under the assumption of uniformity?

Sorry?

You say God does not exist

WRONGH

I say

that is Atheism

I

Dont

Know

@SmugAnimeGirl yeah so?

and?

@TYLER Without the uniformity of nature, you couldn't comprehend the bible.

you dont konw

And?

@SmugAnimeGirl yeah so

And thats the difference

then you have no merit inthe conversation

I say I dont know

You say you know

Thats the difference

youare just a centrist cuck

Yes

@TYLER So God is built upon an assumption, just like the beliefs of any athiest or agnostic.

Check out @L0gg0l’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/L0gg0l/status/926877962233942016?s=09

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfIIg1KUZuw

@SmugAnimeGirl not really. the bible is real and a revelation of years of in person accounts

osama bin laden's favourite naruto game

you just choose to disbelieve

@Zephial Not really.

you just choose to believe

yes really

@Zephial How can you read the bible without first assuming the uniformity of nature?

lol

@Zephial I consider it early Philosophy.

@SmugAnimeGirl god is truth, theres no assumption in truth

@Zephial How can you read the bible without first trusting your senses.

he created the uniformity of nature so yes

@TYLER There is assumption in Truth.

when u know a law and a principle ,theres no reason for assumption

what assumption is there

doesnt seem lik you understand anime girld

Did god create ununiformally the uniformity?

hahah

?

You said he created it

He just created everythign

So was god ununiform when it created uniformity?

he is above everything you inbred

@TYLER Yes, but the laws and principles you claim to rely on are themselves reliant on other assumptions.

lmao

Uniformity does not even have to be attributed to a deity.

That is just a human generalization.

then do you know what it can be attributed to?

It can be attributed to anything justified.

what would that be?

Hence, A huge spaghetti penis.

These people can't comprehend the difference between claiming "I know" and "I don't know". And Darth is using word spaghetti to basically just keep repeating, over and over again, "Your belief is just as ficticious. Because both are based off reality. And you can't measure anything. Because a measuring of something is based of nature. So the measure might not be 'true'"

It's absurd

legless we get it you dont understand basic concepts

its k

@red Already seen.

/ face palm

@SmugAnimeGirl like?

@Zephial I would think the contrary.

Sorry.

@TYLER Like the uniformity of nature, or some basic trust in your senses.

idk what you are talkingabout wheelz

sorry

@Zephial You know exactly what I am insinuating.

i honestly dont

@SmugAnimeGirl what assumptions

Zeph was god ununiform before it created uniformity?

@Zephial Then my point is proven.

: )

?

cool

@TYLER An assumption that nature is uniform. The notion that if x implies y, and you have x, y follows.

https://twitter.com/viperwave/status/926276435836145664

Was god nonlogical before it created logic?

you won an arguement i didnt know was going on i guess

@TYLER everything hinges on this assumption

@SmugAnimeGirl theres no assumption in final authority of those principles

initial point of creation

@TYLER To even begin to comprehend the existence of a final authority, you must already be familiar with those principles.

initial conditions

Presumably god created the ability to create, but if he could already create, then he couldn't create the ability to create again... god is a contradiction and can't exist

If it is charged with creating everything

https://www.vogue.com/article/sneakers-eytys-yung-lean

including the ability to create

You believe in the science lie that we originated as cells or something and that the world is extremely old

you come from a completely false reality

that is maybe why you cant understand

That's a deflection

christ is lord

You can't address the paradox

"Nothing matters and you can believe anything because our reality is a derivative of nature."

".....but that's irrelevant. The point is one person is claiming they know the origin of the universe and the other isn't."

"You aren't comprehending what I'm saying."

Herp derp

im not paying attention to your garbage arguments

I can post it again if you like Zeph

you arent worth anyones time

you are a fucking shill

EURO FAG

If god created everything, this includes the ability to create, but if he could already create, then he couldn't create the ability to create again... god is a contradiction and can't exist

>christian world view

axiomatic

how can he not create the ability for us to create?

are you retarded?

design

to design

how did he create if he hadn't created the ability to create?

That's the issue

design

not create

design

but he can work

with spirit, we cant

we are sinful

Design might have different implications

design

in his own image

design

But this is to say that things exist without being the result of the intentions of god

u can design

which means things exist outside of god

and if thats the case, why is god required?

well under his design, including time being his design, how can u surprize him

how can u surprize an infinite being

THEN THE WINGED HUSSARS ARRIVED

@Gurgio cringe.jpg

COMING DOWN THE MOUTAIN SIDE

oof

That's /pol/ btw

This is DDs claim

halfchan nerds are pure cringe

/pol/ showed up to Nov 4th in some city

/pol/ is nowhere near that fit

This isn't a problem that DD is posing

Their banner literally says /pol/

That's not a problem

It's a problem for the theist

becuase the theist believes god is personal

The deist does not

what do u mean personal

God is somehow detectable through his actions or states to ones experience

In christian theism, this is things like revalation and Jesus coming to earth etc

But that's just a theistic constraint

what

so what

whats ur point

So its not an argument against Diesm

hes not personal, hes universal

the argument is revelation

That isn't an arguement either

other revelation doesnt explain

That just presumes his position is true,

which is to beg the question

sorryh

let me correct that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9H1pTw0p4A

the laws ,the principles are explained in revelation, if u dont beg his authority, u beg your authority

i trust the final authority of design

He is pressuming Wheelz position to be false because he assumes his own position to be true, and that is to just beg the question

against Wheelz

he has given his reasoning

i presume nothing

guess you didnt listen as usual

He hasn't given reasons

he has

What was it?

Revelation

God having authority and contact with the world

Deism does not

Right, so Wheelz denies revelation, how would Darwins argue it

Because all he can do, is assume revelation

WHICH BEGS THE QUESTION

Which is not an argument against Wheelz

Well the bible is actual acccounts of happenings in time