gaming_tech
Discord ID: 356288574485954561
9,508 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 21/39
| Next
Next to the revert button
sorry
this is my first time overclocking
I'm aware
lol
should i click start with windows too
because its unchecked
even though the windows icon on the control is lit up
Start with windows where? In settings? Sure
ok thanks
Still gonna call you an aerospastic
i am
lastly
is it normal for gpu fans to not be spinning
i turned off afterburner and kombustor
and the fans stopped
Yes
ok
Some GPU's will turn off their fans entirely when the card is under a certain temperature/demand to minimize noise in office workloads.
nice
so thats it
thanks
later businesspastic
heh
Yeah np. Once I get on my PC in a couple of days or maybe longer, I'll help you with CPU OC.
A lot more trial and error with that
nah its fine
But I can teach you how to do it properly for future reference too
I recommend it
dont feel the need to
dont really run cpu dependent tasks
Every task is CPU dependant
True tme
i mean
that the REALLY
like video editing
on hardware monitor
cpu usage never goes above 10% for me
Trust me, it's worth squeezing a higher frequency out of your CPU, especially if you can do it without increasing the voltage much more than stock.
It's easy to do
you said its a lot more trial and error
and i fucked up that gpu oc pretty bs
bad
Depends on what you want to do, but there isn't really much trial and error with GPU overclock, it's more straight forward.
aight
And then we can use voice chat
i look forward to overclocking
And you can use video on your phone so I can walk you through it.
kk
aight cya l8r
Cya doot
yo
do you have your pc yet
we have to do the cpu oc today
Y
not gonna be able to after spring break
y
ors unday
prof emailed us said works gonna be ramped up
We can do it on Sunday lol
kk
ill be able to really late
11 pm sunday sound good?
I might be able to, maybe a bit earlier because of work though.
im gonna get back to college by like 11:00
wait
does overclocking void warranty @Wayne
im watching a bunch of vids on it and overclocking cpu doesnt seem to be as easy or necessary as gpu
@Bearchoyboi it is detrimental to general performance beyond just gaming framerate, and many games benefit noticeably from higher single-thread performance.
why are you questioning it so much
I OC'd my Xeons on a modded bios
16 cores, 32 threads at 3.6 :)
each CPU or both collectively?
mind you, that's two packages
collectively
older xeons?
E5 2680 v1's
what architecture is that again?
sub Ivy right?
I had some 2650v2's which are basically the same
before Ivy
no, those are Ivy Bridge
orly
neat
v2 is sandy bridge
I have an Ivy Bridge E i7 4820k
ah nice
yeah, the 3000 series was on the LGA 1366 boards
It has great single-thread and multithread, but I want more multithread for encoding
same with X5000 series xeons
the turbo boost from that generation was shit
I was thinking i7 8700k but I want an 8-core for the most possible versatility
it didn't have multi-step, and it was either all or none as far as cores go
so you either had all of your cores turbo boosting, or none
when it comes to CPU's a high single-thread performance 8-core with hyptread is pretty future proof
gonna last like 4 years ez
4th gen fixed that
I'm looking to upgrade to some 2670 v2's when they start retiring those and the price goes down
right now they're like 250 for one
the 2680 v1's that I got were 110 each
also the cool thing with an 8-core, make your primary 4-cores faster for gaming, and allocate 4 for streaming since they are under the consistent load of the encoding you have set
I wouldn't buy a xeon though, this is for personal rig
this is my personal rig
honestly love them, it's still snappy
so I want 8700k st with 8core multi
but the st is so low with xeons
it's slower, you're right
great for media servers and video, but not for gaming alone
if you do gaming and recording, 8-core with high st is best imo
but for what I do, it's good, none of my games are all that hurt by it
so my graphics drivers just vanished from my computer
what do you do?
yeah, 8 cores is the best balance right now
that actually has happened to me before
like 3 times in the last 5 years
happened to me once
praise nvidia
@Sverd windows has that issue especially when you have multiple gpus installed on risers. how many gpus are u running? just reinstall them.
who wants a very high quality version of "nights in white satin" in FLAC
it's just irritating
fucking around with reinstalling drivers
because god knows integrated can barely operate
before i switched my rigs over to HiveOS i was running windows - had that issue on reboot sometimes when drivers wouldnt register. just had to keep uninstalling/reinstalling them
who has a GPU at or above the performance of a GTX 980 in here?
me
what about Pingoy OS? @SchloppyDoggo
GTX 1070
post your Firestrike extreme scores
i got twin 1080tis in my personal computer/main system
I don't have firestrike
just look up reference scores
ugh
no
@.PunishedShlomo i havent messed with it. from what i understand its just a custom build of ubuntu - not designed specifically for mining
I went on an overclocking run and I got a pretty good balance between temps, but it had crashed so I went back by 4mhz on the core and 8 on the memory.
what was your memory at?
over stock
im still waiting for jewgle to release quantum core processors and that architecture. itll be hard af to even get ahold of one but im ready to buy.
quantum CPU's require extreme cooling
well, stock speeds are 1366 on the core, 3505 on the memory, I got the core to 1450, got the memory to 3628
not because fo power draw/heat it's because they can't function properly without it
980 at 1450 is pretty high
I know, I was surprised
dropped off after 1460
but honestly, lowering that to 1425MHz for the stability exchange wont hurt at all
gonna stress test it all of tomorrow and see
not even 2% difference
for huge stability benefit
yeahhhhhh
so you're wasting time lol
I might :^)
just do 1425 core and 3600 mem and be done with it
1425 is already like
over 17% reference stock clock
not factory clock
for non-reference
I got 6384 on FSE, which is pretty good for a 980
GTX 980 Engine Specs:
2048
CUDA Cores
1126
Base Clock (MHz)
1216
Boost Clock (MHz)
the card came at 1366 boost
and it ran nice and cool
1270 base
relative to stock card boost you, get just over 17% higher freq with 1425mhz
just leave it there and be done with it
and 3600 on mem
I will, just gotta figure out what voltage it's happy at
you're manually changing voltage for your GPU?
yeah, Precision XOC
If you're going over highest auto-voltage, then you are degrading the card faster, it will barely do shit, but also voids warranty
what's the max voltage increase it allows?
don't do more than like 8% more than max auto volatge
and find a stable spot there
I did like 50mV over lmao
I don't care, gonna run this baby into the ground
@Polygon what card are u tryin to oc?
trying?
I already did, and billy's just being a mom
make and model
Gigabyte GTX 980 gaming, three fan version
ive never oc'd anything under 1060
cant help
didn't need help
just wanted other's scores
when will the fucking cryptocurrency rape end?
i remember when GTX 1*** series was cheap
and RX 400/500s were like the best deals out there
It's already gotten much better, but is still cancerous
@Wayne Quantum computing is the only way "Artificial Intelligence" will ever come to fruition.
Depends on their productivity. If we can make a quantum computer that allows us to create true AI, then what's to say we can't use conventional architecture processing at an enormous scale to achieve the same goal? Of course there will need to be improvements on many things to achieve what quantum processors could, but who's to say quantum computing is required for it? We already have some intense deep learning performance between GPU's CPU's and more intelligent software. At the rate of progress we're at for that sort of thing, we may be able to create neural networks as complex as some more complex multi-cell organisms by the next decade, but that's just speculation, I can't personally back that up. Time will tell. Just remember, quantum processors can have more packed in atomic transistors with quantum properties that doesn't make them as straight forward as binary processing, but it will likely prove difficult to take advantage of those properties, so the software side of quantum computing alone could easily set us back.
Also the precision of the current CPU manufacturing process is as fine as 10nm, and the amount of transistors in one confined area is incredible. So the benefit we'd get from quantum transistors, especially given our current progress is debatable until there is observable benefit.
hey nerds
gaming desktop or gaming laptop
why not both
poorfag
@GirlBeGood depends, are you in college?
because in all reality, get a chromebook for on the go, and invest most of your money into a nice ass desktop
unless you really need portability desktop is way better value
you're a degenerate...but I agree
@Wayne going over the highest auto-voltage doesnt necessarily kill the card fast enough for it to matter lmao
of course you need to know what you're doing
Now personally i would not advise going higher than the regulator circuit allows
I'm fully aware of that, going like 50mv over isn't even close to 8% over peak anyways
well i've had a r7 240 running at 1.4v (max the regulator will allow) for about a year now
What's the typical max voltage under load?
i think it was like .9v or 1v one of the two
lemme check the bios if i still have it
I douuuubbbt it
My GTX 760's will go up to 1200mV
Continuously as a max
Never heard of a max under like 1100mv
nevermind
ok its 1.15v max
it just usually runs around .9
Yeah, but you wanna measure max so you know your peak after the increase
That's like 21% higher then
i mean its the max the card can physically do without physically modifying it
How much benefit do you actually get out of that extra .25v though? What's the max freq for no-voltage OC versus that 1.4v?
Stable ofc
no voltage OC is +300mhz, 1.3v gets +780mhz, but i keep it at 1.4v because i want to see when itll die since its a cheap card
And you game with that +780 no issues?
the card runs at 780mhz max without overclock
yeah
though im not personally using the card anymore
And there's no freq difference between 1.3 and 1.4?
still, its in my household getting used daily (lmfao fallout 4)
correct
if there is, its too small for me to care to measure
What's the cards total frequency?
Before oc
730, 780 when it goes into the manufacturer's boost clock
oh yeah i forgot to mention 1.3v helps with memory overclocking a bit but its not by much
the card doesnt memory OC very well anyways
There's a 45% difference in frequency for that 21% increase in voltage. I mean, I won't believe that until I see it, because you get less return in a sloped path, the higher the voltage gets.
how do you want me to prove it?
if it matters to you enough, that is
Also you're like doubling the frequency, it has to perform at least 50% better
however take note
A video I guess
it overclocks high at stock voltage
What's the OC at stock voltage?
The 300
+300
thats rough though since i havent done it in a while
Yeah, but you're saying that a 21% increase in voltage is getting 45% higher frequency
That doesn't really make much sense
9,508 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 21/39
| Next