No, I value order, racial ascendance, and spiritual purity.

the only difference is someone hurt you bad in the past

Moral philosophy is partially based on emotional axioms

moral philosophy is a post rationalization of axiomatic intuitive emotional reactions to things

Okay, so Vril, a hypothwttical.

If an alien race came to earth much more advanced than you, would be okay with them harvesting your bodies?

No

Of the entire white race elts say

Why would I?

What arguemnt would you give to them to have them not destroy you?

Or do you have none?

There is no argument, if they can do it and they want to, they have no reason not to

Youpeople are dark man

what argument would you give

What's your damage?

just saying the word "empathy" isn't an argument

I would say I value all sentient life, and each has a certian set of basic rights it is entitled too.

Ultimately it is, you value race

I would argue that if you allow us to ascend we can fulfill our genetic potential, and in so doing we can form alliances with your civilization in the future perhaps when we ascend to galactic civilizations. Also space faring civilizations which show mercy to the lessors would be more well received by their equals.

i value empathy.

So the incentive for them not to kill us would be an appeal to empathy and an appeal to their own self interest, wherein if they attack and destroy us their equals in another encounter might see this and grow weary

What genetic potential?

why do you value all sentient life, and why would an alien race (who likely exterminated all of their competition to get where they are, just as humans did to other sapient species on earth) value us because we are sentient

pre-emptively attacking them

and destroying them

YOu do realize that's no how evolution works?

Not

It kinda is

Normie what would the laternative be?

the alternative to what?

Your right it's my base presupposition

so what is yours?

That the species maters the most?

@Somedudewithaname I do understand how evolution works, but since I am NS I believe in eugenics. Genetic potential within the human context is us selecting for phenotypes, and genotypes which benefit our ascension to become higher order beings.

And what if the white race is outclassed by asians?

Good for the asians

This is the idealist NS outlook on genetics

Ahhh.

@Somedudewithaname They aren't, but I have no interest in lording over other races

I am an isolationist

They have higher IQ/s

I want to largely ignore other races and peoples so long as they don't tamper with us

this isn't true actually

what makes you think that would benefit you?

Yes it is actually.

if you control for removing hispanic whites they have comparable and higher IQ's for western Europeans

Vril don't get bogged down in an argument about chinese IQ

and American whites

hispanic-whites are what bring down our average

but my argument isn't based on IQ he's right

it doesn't matter in the long run what the chinese score on their IQ tests

that's an alt right talking point, I am not alt right

as long as you aren't literally retarded as a population (blacks), you can make it work

Still doesnt change the fact singaprorians have the highest iq

SO you just want to be left alone?

Even if your pov was correct it wouldn't change anything about my ideology.

Becuase....

I just don't understand why?

Because it's not linked in any way. Singaporeans having a high IQ is irrelevant to an ethnonationalist isolationist society.

Why would we care?

if anything it would just give us more incentive to practice eugenics

Why does an ethnostate matter so much to you?

to raise the avg IQ

@Somedudewithaname because other races are not tolerant like we are being

So you want to excute the low iq whites inyour ethnostate to?

Okay lol

they are competing with us and we are refusing to acknowledge this

Ilove irnoy

we need to resume competition with them

Because homogeneity creates order, harmony, and allows us to focus on a specific group of like minded people spiritually and culturally to ascend into the stars.

Your evidence?

Ultimately because it encourages social cohesion and stability

America became the largest supperpower on the backs of immigrants

the usssr had many ethnic groups

most empires have not bee nhomogenous

@Somedudewithaname I recommend you look up alternative hypothesis's website, he cites mountains of studies on the subject of social cohesion and racial homogeneity

I have

his studies rely on misinterpeting data

And ultiamtely i dont care

I think you're confusing technological achievement which was largely subsidized by the state and developed by Europeans and in some cases Asians as some achievement of globo homo.

What do you want then?

muslims in europe for example, actively seek supremacy in our own nations
what would you do in response to this? @Somedudewithaname

If you don't care about technolgical advancements, what advancements are you expecting?

Social cohesion?

who is this pebble fag and why should i care

I just said, a racially homogeneous pan European America which has a National Socialist set of policies.

Give me an example of an ethnostate

China

Japan

They don't

IF they do secularize them

At least they don't over here in america

@Somedudewithaname The advancements I'm expecting are an increase in intelligence, higher understanding of spiritual reality, higher optimal nutritional ability, sturdier and better bodies through years of proper breeding etc

cause we llearned to get along with immigrants

it wasn't that hard

because they are less than a percent of the USA

WAit wait...

what will you do when they are 1/3 of germany

A good example of what is effectively an ethnostate in the modern world is Japan

Not all white posses these traits