chat
Discord ID: 496515828372602890
158,305 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 461/634
| Next
I am fully American and see that Democracy destroys the exact values we want to keep.
Yes gib role
Democracy is a false God.
Fully american means ur genes are britbong
Rip
Indeed
Ur like me
You are not American if you want to impose tyranny
Anglo americans are your brothers
So as long as it's Democratic tyranny you're okay with it?
Begging for roles will not give you roles
Good virtue signaling.
Calling something a tyranny doesn't make it so
Reee
I got some sick new roles
<:feelspepoman:385617707044962304>
Just wnat image role
Monarchy/=Tyranny
Democracy=Tyranny
This is the cycle, and it is eternal.
What about both
You do realise the US is a republic not a direct democracy?
Constitutional Representative Republic*
Electoral college prevents tyranny of the majority that comes from democracy
Monarchy is retarded
The electoral college doesn't vote against the people, even when it's in their best interest.
Why
you have to rely on hereditary values only
Democracy is retarded
Thats not an argument against monarchy being retarded
Pure democracy is retarded
You have to rely on everyone, even those completely incompetent, to make a proper choice based off of values and not their wants
monarchy is rart
Representative Democracy is no better if the Representatives are absolute shite.
Relying on one person to align with your values is no different
and a monarch is far harder to remove and stays in power for life
Monarchy is no better if the monarch is absolute shite
A monarch typically has more on the line. His legacy is the success of the nation, and he has been raised to make it succeed. When in an inter period of social transference to a new system, a monarchy makes more sense than the whim of the people or the whim of a the representatives.
I don't like monarchies for the sake of monarchies, I like monarchies to achieve end goals more in line with the original values.
You have an entire history of mad kings and tyrants to look back on as evidence of your folly
Hi people
hi
<:GWnanamiRokaNaisu:398860628476952576>
Relying on the lowest common denominator to pick the people with power
You have a history of tyrants in democratic states too lol
You have an entire history of empires and successful kings. You also have a history of ruined Democracies or representative Democracies.
Your point is?
>Sometimes things fail
There is no president that has ever lived who even rivals the most mild of europeans tyrants
Even if they were on par the length of suffering would be at 4 years
KEK
4 years is a better span of time to endure a failure than a lifespan
The world doesnโt revolve around the US
Absolute monarchy or consitututional monarchy?
Most kings didn't live a lifetime of rule, and most US presidents haven't achieved what kings do.
Plus it was pretty shit depending who you were
This is all just wild assumption
Like during the Indians wars
I'll just hope my tyrant king dies within the next 60 years
If you were a black
This isn't a fucking assumption
A wamen
why vote him out in 4 if he can die in 60
None of the Anglo kings ruled their entire lives
You're talking about a modern monarchy
None of the Egyptian kings ruled their entire lives.
It's usually a 10-20 year period.
unless you're asking for a return to medieval medicine and cutthroat politics you're going to have lots of Queen Elizabeths living forever
These damned monarchists I say
You can always set an age cap.
Do you still think with the technology we have we couldnโt detect mental illnesses and either fix it or remove then from secession
Isn't like Democracy alleviates the situation of imbeciles in power for decades.
Who enforces an age cap in an absolute monarchy? Or is this a constitutional monarchy, i.e not a monarchy
>Did I say absolute Monarchy
Or if t happens in the reign of the monarch have a mechanism
So you want a monarchy on the parliamentary model of Britain?
Also every monarch no matte rhow absolute relays on others
With a figurehead monarch?
Nooooooo
Britain Monarchs literally do nothing
That only has the illusion of power allowed to them by actual politicians
Those two clearly fucked
A pajeet in the street and a pajeet in the sheets
Gross
I just figure that a man raised from birth to rule is more effective at it then a man who was elected by ignorant individuals for their own personal gains. And about the 4 year thing, there's plenty of instances where wars could've been avoided and were mostly started because of the President.
What would you do if a big bellied indian man appeared at your doorway and AFFORD to be your bride
But he will marry you and you can raise a little happy brown family
Can't please this guy
And fuck your monarchy
you're definitely getting the musket you Benedict Arnold
Is that a personal threat?
And about the four year thing
All those wars started by presidents were ended by his successors in a shorter span than your 100 year war
Sure sounds like it
Are you feeling threatened
appeal to the king for military intervention
Did I say I wanted monarchy for the sake of monarchy and monarchy only?
The king will tax all the gold out of your pocket
no more coins for you
The niggers in office already do that
Thinking a king won't tax you
Thinking a Democracy is any better
Wow
Thinking a king will have opponents to his tax laws that have the power to remove
him
They don't remove those who impose taxes now
T R U M P
Tax Rate -------------
decreasing
decreasing
tax relief literally happening right now
imagine king obama for 100 years
Imagine a coon being king of anything
๐บ๐ธ ๐
Four-score and fuck off buddy
AMERICA WINS AGAIN
OH SAY CAN YOU SEE
OH SAY CAN YOU SEE
OH SAY CAN YOU SEE ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ ๐บ๐ธ OH SAY CAN YOU SEE
king of trash
for sure
You can be pedantic and say "X can be bad"
No
Fucking
Shit
Any leader can be a bad leader. The benefits of a Monarchy in establishing a true Libertarian society are 1. the reduction of overhead influence 2. the centralization of changing force 3. the whim of the people is not the driving force
I like how you're trying to make me out as the Britbong when I literally don't want a government lmao
Libertarian King <:merchlaugh:476417893916082176><:merchlaugh:476417893916082176> <:merchlaugh:476417893916082176>
>A king for transition
That is it
In my libertarian society government is centralised in a single tyrant we are free and independent as long as our king declares it so
Lmao
And who shall be the great king of our united states shall it be you?
Democracy is socialism in slow motion
You're not comprehending what I am saying whatsoever.
Do you think we could Democratically create a Libertarian society?
The best way to secure a libertarian state is monarchy
Do you think crackheads will Democratically give up their welfare?
Or poor people
You NEED a Pinochet style figure or a king.
It can't be piecemeal
You need the whole fucking pie.
Or the agriculture giants their subsidizes
Essentially you want to put a king in power to ensure that there is no resistance to removal of welfare and non-libertarian concepts is that right?
But the very act of putting a king in power will create that resistance?
No heโs not saying that
Lel
Heโs saying with a king those things wouldnโt be possible
I am saying you would need some entity applying significant force against the will of the people.
As that would undermine the state in the long term
So the only way for this to work is for a king to already exist
because you cant install one currently
This monarch could be a king, a dictator, I do not care. But you do need some form of leader who is not reliant upon fulfilling campaign promises and pandering to niggers.
That is all.
We donโt leave in a vacuum
Things change
You fellas are pretty wild
I love America
I mostly love the Constitution
(I prefer the Articles of Confederation to a degree)
I just find that Democracy is ruining this nation as of now.
I donโt care much for the constitution but thatโs another question
<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Calcifer#6044 was banned***
People who have no concept of economics are becoming the leaders of the economy
Men with no concept of proper rationing of federal aid are being in charge of it.
That is insane. The fact that they're elected does not change the insanity, and the fact that they're elected is indicative of the ignorance of most.
You need, at some point, a central figure to dissolve the state as we know it.
What happened lol
Mods are tyrants
as usual
We ShOulD VoTe foR tHe mOdS
I like how you're comparing the Libertarian Confederalist to a die hard Monarchist. <:FeelsLELMan:356316501105442817>
It's pretty ironic tbh
How will you install this monarch?
No earthly idea. I would figure it would be similar to the US Revolution or any other massive change. I don't see how you could Democratically elect someone who is antithetical to half the nation.
and before Drumpf....
When the democratic state was imposed by force
Lmao
Drumpf is stil a Statist and is fucking mild by my measures.
I don't understand this
So you just want a monarch for the transitory period
but you are willing to fight a civil war and utterly destroy your opposition
why not go straight to a libertarian state?
Unless you are using the monarch to enforce it
Because it canโt survive in a democratic state
which means you get a libertarian state for as long as that particular monarch lives
What part of that are you not getting
Why not abolish the centralised government entirely?
The US was a libertarian state until maybe the 1850โs
Because thatโs retarded
Iโm not even a libertarian
Im actually chatting to the other fella bop
but i appreciate your wise input
Libertarians think the state is some kind of disease, they do not realise that the state developed naturally.
First there were tribal families, which then formed tribes with other families. Multiple tribes later joined together and formed a town/city, eventually those towns and cities needed a central administrative body to join them together. There you have it - A state
I considered myself libertarian
If you remove the state today, the only result will be either a foreign power invading and taking your land since it doesn't legally belong to anyone, or someone else takes control - be it a wealthy family or oligarchs - which reinstates the state
these guys sound more like anarchists
Fuck cyan, go turquoise
Rip
Every time I come here I see someone get banned...
BARAUMPH FEAINUEHSED
@Kraftzmann the Free of course he does, that doesnโt surprise anyone
Turns out Alec Baldwin won an emmy for his SNL donald trump sketches
ready to burn down hollywood now
<:npc:500426131493617684>
<:npc:500426131493617684>
<:npc:500426131493617684>
Hi how are you <:npc:500426131493617684>
I
i
i
Itโs like
40F where I am
It su NS
OOOOOF
Sh kap
Sucks
penis
Yesterday it was 85 ish
Welcome to Texas
Alec Baldwin commits literal treason (felony) on NBC and somehow criminal charges are not filed against him.
Damn
36k views
2k upboats
The missing gold dust has really hit him hard
Report him to the Secret Service
Itโs not like it would really matter
Heโs veiled by ((Hollywood))
We knew that was coming
ahhh alec baldwin just jelly he wasnt the celebrity to come up with the "ima be president" meme and pull through with it
Fuck relationships im gonna die alone.
@S u z u take @chattitude back if yourself so desperate
H A
..wtf
My crush was taken away by a polygamous couple.
Does nobody here love Israel? ๐ญ
i
i
i
i
i
i i i i i i
#nerdbash2018 <-- google it you fuckin virgins
u never had sex b4
u 2
u 2
ur mum 2
U Thot
XDDDDDDDDD
One to many thots.
Time to bring law and order.
SVU coming for you.
HAHAHAHAHA please run Pocahontas.
I will bet my net worth on Donald Trump and advise you fellas do the same.
158,305 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 461/634
| Next