trump
Discord ID: 513098339961798676
188,487 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 657/754
| Next
A different bill with that included was blocked in the senate
Trump separately did an EO
he passed with an executive order
he bypassed the senate
cuz they are rinos
> “I don’t know if you have had the misfortune of having health economists tell you about Danish cement,” said Amanda Starc, an associate professor of strategy at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern, one of several scholars who mentioned a paper with a punny name: “Government-Assisted Oligopoly Coordination? A Concrete Case.”
> Everybody loves the Danish concrete example!” said Matthew Grennan, an assistant professor of health care management at Wharton, who has studied the effects of price transparency on hospital purchases.
> The Danish government, in an effort to improve competition in the early 1990s, required manufacturers of ready-mix concrete to disclose their negotiated prices with their customers. Prices for the product then rose 15 percent to 20 percent.
and hate him
Lol
Who do u guys think the nominee at the end of the primary my current predictions are sanders 50% Bloomberg 15% Biden 5% Warren 5% brokered convention 25%
So it’s not a silver bullet, for once in a blue moon I hope it’s struck down by some judge in Hawaii.
But I support Trump’s good efforts of increasing FDA generic approval by deregulation
buttigeg hopefully
And increasing imports from other countries.
The abstract
> In 1993 the Danish antitrust authority decided to gather and publish firm‐specific transactions prices for two grades of ready‐mixed concrete in three regions of Denmark. Following initial publication, average prices of reported grades increased by 15–20 percent within one year. We investigate whether this was due to a business upturn and/or capacity constraints, but argue that these seem to have little explanatory power. We conclude that a better explanation is that publication of prices allowed firms to reduce the intensity of oligopoly price competition and, hence, led to increased prices contrary to the aim of the authority.
Buttigieg I don’t think he can win his support among minorities is less then 5%
Maybe if he can build up support there
he will once he has more airtime.e
I think Sanders will win the nominee
besides it's not like voters actually choose the candidate
Yeah anything can happen in this crazy field
Unless the Nevada caucus fails lol
Which it probably will.
Yeah I think sanders has a real good shot
sanders would get blown out by trump
in this economy especially
Yeah I think trump would have a larger margin of victory
just name one swing state u think he might lose to bernie?
certainly wont be florida with all the Cubans running from communism
u think the rust belt like bernie?
he barely won new Hampshire with only 5k votes... so sad
Yeah I don’t see any I see trump holding Wisconsin Michigan Ohio Florida Pennsylvania in that match up as long as economy stays where it is
even a slight recession wouldnt impact him depending on when it starts and how bad it is
Yeah
I think the only way trump loses is if he makes a key error going up to re election the economy falls jobs fall or if the democratic candidate that wins is in the middle which I don’t see any in the field at the moment there was Yang which was kind of middle but not really Delayne was he was gone really quick Biden can be seen as middle but he is done that leave Brenie Bloomberg Pete Warren Klobuchar none strike me as a middle candidate all have pretty far left policies none as far left as Bernie except maybe Warren
Lol
That’s an impressive pile of opinions backed by nothing
So, Bernie’s base aligns pretty well with WI and MI, not so much with PA
His base is uneducated whites and young
Young votes don’t show up to the polls
I SUPPORT TRUMP!!!
I second that @The Official Max
🐐
GG @The Official Max, you just advanced to level 2!
greetings
im pro-trump
how bout u
Lel
I can’t wait for the election it’s going to be epic
Trump 2024
Monarchy forever
Capitalism forever
We will see the victorious outcome of the republican leadership this November as dems seem to be slipping out of reality. They have called for more investigations into trump in an attempt to derail his campaign as a counter attack to trumps major success as president.
I would be okay with zero immigration for 5 yrs followed by very selective and mild immigration for 1 year. then zero for five and so on.
@Sophie "Trump is losing his base"
> More Americans now identify as Republican than identify as Democrat
https://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx
I suppose we'd need a stat that compares those who identify as Reps versus those who identify as Trumpists.
I doubt Gallup does those though.
94% of Reps support Trump.
I think that's good enough.
Right, but maybe she has a point.
Plus, don't forget:
❌ to doubt
she might have evidence!
Hey, it's no laughing matter.
You said it yourself: saying one has evidence means they do.
So, we just need Sophie to tell us that she has evidence, and then you have to admit she does.
You set the standards, bud!
Trump trump trump
peepotrump
“Supersonic” missiles
How old is he
How old is who?
Trump?
73
It was an expression
He said “supersonic” missiles in his speech
The amount of plastic surgery he’s had is ridiculous
lol
Venezuela’s oil
^americas
dotard destroyed
@Vlad And Trump just got a 46% approval rating, highest on 538
(Likely & Registered voters)
Ya, 'cause across all polls it's significantly lower I imagine.
"All polls" is 44.4%
Disapproval is 51%.
Also, I am sure that it must have been higher at the start of his presidency.
Yeah at like the first day
It always is.
Ever since it's been low, but increasing.
On likely voters 50% disapprove, 46% approve
That's nuts.
The is is easily the best part of one of the polls
> And the poll has President Donald Trump's approval rating tied for his all-time high in the NBC News/WSJ survey, while also finding that the most unpopular candidate qualities in a general election are being a** socialist**, being **older than 75 years of age** and having a **heart attack in the past year**.
Trump has higher rating than Obama, unfortunately leftist dems think they have the high ground lol. They thought the same in 2016 and lost in a landslide.
Money for pardons.
feelscorruptman
> President Donald Trump granted a full pardon and clemency to a construction company owner whose family donated over $200,000 to his presidential campaign.
> Paul Pogue, the construction company owner, pleaded guilty to underpaying his taxes by nearly $500,000 and received three years probation.
@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ lol it’s a well known fact that party registration leans dem. And are you forgetting about that plurality independents group? Seriously learn to read a poll.
Yeah but not anymore.
Reps are leading registration now.
@!GoldenKingship! landslide = 3rd lowest electoral victory in history, biggest popular loss in history
@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ where did you hear that?
What do you think I tagged you for?
That’s not what that means dumbass
Jesus Christ you’re a moron
And Republicans + Republicans leaner is higher
48-44
Affiliation is not registration
That's one hell of mental gymnastics
It’s basic definition...
You need to take a look at the crosstabs
I'm not interested in semantics, Republicans have more people affiliating with their party than democrats.
It’s not semantics
Dems have a lead in registration. That, combined with the dismal performance trump has among independents
Having a lead in registration is useless if you have more people affiliating as Reps
lol
Should not cause you to re-examine the prior
Independents who vote dem but are not “affiliated” (such as Bernie) are not “useless”
You seriously need to learn to read a poll before you start diving into crosstabs
Amateur move- this is basic stuff
If you're affiliated with a party, you'll be voting for them.
It's a rarity someone affiliates with Reps and votes dem.
Especially with a President with the highest GOP approval ever.
(His approval with independents recently is 42%, one of his bests).
Dems don’t need a single republican affiliated vote
If reps take all reps, Dems take all Dems, and a majority of independents are voting dem, Dems have a lead
Or, for your simpleton brain- 1-1+1=1
Your claim was different, "trump has lost his base"
So you're shifting goalposts.
Yes, he has
Hence why there are more Reps than dems and of those 94% support Trump
Trump won a lot of independents in 2016
He’s lost them
He has the same amount of support from indep's as he did in January
2017
That is a big problem for him
Just inaccurate statement
> 2017 Jan 20-29 89 42 13
Sigh approval ratings are not electoral performance
2020 Jan 16-29 94 42 7
It’s like talking to a child
42 and 42
Read 538
Learn how to read a poll
Learn how these questions are asked
Ok let me go over this again, 42% of independents approve of Trump. This was the same in January 2017.
Where is this "lost" support.
Approval is not electoral performance
<:political_thinking:583244726040264704>
The lost support is the landslides against trump in 2017, 2018, 2019
All of which conformed to the generic ballot
But the approval ratings suggest otherwise.
Which is currently dem +6
This is about Trump, not his party.
I’m talking about actual votes, not approval ratings
The actual votes were back in 2016
Anything between then is not a representative.
Mhm, the 3 years after 2016 are more recent than 2016 honey
Of course they are
Because we get this
> "Nearly two-thirds of the Trump voters who said they voted for Democratic congressional candidates in 2018 say that they’ll back the president against all three named opponents."
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/04/upshot/one-year-from-election-trump-trails-biden-but-leads-warren-in-battlegrounds.html
Trump was very much “on the ballot”
...yes
No, he wasn't.
His party was.
Let’s walk through that statement
Nearly 2/3rds
This is what people said in 2010 about Obama.
That is catastrophic for trump
Not really, combined with the people who *didn't* vote.
That's a good sign.
2012 also conformed to the generic ballot
That means a full 1/3rd of people who voted for trump in 2016 but voted for a dem in 2018 are definitely voting against him in 2020
Not exactly
That is not a good sign for trump- it’s a sign of...
Many of those haven't made their mind up.
HIS BASE SHRINKING
No, literally that’s what that means
If his base is shrinking, party affiliations would be going the inverse way.
That’s not accurate.
His approval would be falling.
Again, no evidence to support that
A rising approval means there's something wrong with your hypothesis.
No, it really doesn’t
It just means you don’t understand what approval rating is measuring
Well it clearly does, more people approve. And damn approval ratings are good predictors of wins
Approval of Trump, simply put.
Lmao
a. Approval ratings are not indicative of wins right now
They've been for ages?
b. His approval rating is super low
Not till about March
>49%
>Super low
...yes
I'm pretty sure all he needs is 45% to win.
44% is a more accurate number
on 538 that's 46% lol
How is "44%" an accurate number?
Aaaand no president has won with under 50%
Yes, we'll see that go above soon.
It's trending upwards, I mean have you seen 538 recently?
<#542037236053442561>
538 has him at 44
46%*
You're not using registered or likely voters.
and an dis-approval of 50%
You’re mixing metrics dude
Jesus Christ
Not really, I like using this since it's closer to the true value.
Then you have to do an apples to apples comparison
What was Obama’s approval
I just did lol
I'll check
No, you’re comparing a LV model to a general approval rating
Alright some of us have jobs
Learn to read a poll, then check Gallup’s pollster rating
I will return later
On gallup, it was 46%, while Trump has 49%.
According to RCP 46%, RCP has Trump at 45.7%
> No, you’re comparing a LV model to a general approval rating
Because... it's more precise.
Why do you think the GOP lets him do whatever he wants? They want to cram as many pyscho judges and terrible legislation as they can before their boomer extinction.
@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ uuuh it’s not a matter of “precision” it’s a matter of apples to apples
Yeah Dems will have to pack the court
Just to make it fair again
> before their boomer extinction.
lol
lol
A phenomenal read.
Thnx
Ok Boomer!
ew
i can’t believe you said that
<:milady:591248801189330944>
the “ok boomer😂” joke was never funny idc
locals will rlly laugh at anything
Ok Millenial!
omg that was creative
<:zoomer:583662070462021633>
India is building a wall to hide the slums ahead of trump visit.
Golden, don't flood the chat with emotes.
Pretty pls.
Ok vlad but you must insist that there was context behind the conversation so i emoted as a reply which is a visual response to the other persons comment.
188,487 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 657/754
| Next