trump
Discord ID: 513098339961798676
188,487 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 45/754
| Next
Now this is important because the lower-middle has always been an emerging and disappearing class.
hence the Dream Chaser
These are the people that pursue the American Dream and their optimism to pursue it.
And they are essentially the voter base of every national election.
Middle Class simply don't care about healthcare
because one: their job can give it to them or two: they can afford it
Now these lower-middle people however they can't.
They're not poor enough that the government will subsidize for a majority of their healthcare
nor are they wealthy enough to buy it on their own
So both parties intend to enfranchise these people.
Ever since labor unions have decreased in strength and power, the lower-middle has been fucked from everywhere
from the government, from their jobs, and from society.
For government, they simply don't qualify for programs that should make them qualified.
For jobs, they feel their work are underappreciated and underrepresented (hence why labor unions even start up)
For society, where they're expected to suddenly "git gud" and "stop being poor"
GG @Techpriest, you just advanced to level 20!
Now both parties actually try to solve this problem.
Democrats propose for government problem: let's just raise the qualifications and increase the programs' funding!
Republicans however prefer a more federalism approach where "let's just give the states a block sum grant of money and then have the states decide what qualify"
Both have varying success rates ofc.
For jobs, Democrats want to increase the minimum wage while Republicans want to cut taxes.
For society however, this is where the parties are currently fighting over.
Democrats want you to stop being poor and getting good by granting affirmative actions and regulating immoral business practices.
Republicans however believe that how the fuck can people get good and stop being poor because of regulation and reverse racism?
I'll give one good example for instance in California.
The Housing Market is easily imagined for the 5 classes.
Upper - (can afford multiple and may even rent out)
Middle-Upper - (owns a house and almost done paying it off)
Middle - (paying the house on mortgage)
Lower-Middle - (high-risk house-buyer)
Lower - (rent only)
Now for the upper class, the housing market in California is particularly lovely.
House prices are going up, thus rent prices can go up. All this money upper class people are making
easy
The middle-upper and middle enjoy this because they probably bought a house already and just paying it off.
However, the lower-middle and lower are fucked in the ass
They can't afford to buy a house given a shit house is worth a mansion in Texas and rent prices are ridiculously high.
So what does the majority Democrat party do?
On government side, they're helping the lower class by providing subsidized housing where the government will pay almost $2k/month for you to live there and be affordable for you. (the lower-middle however... some do not qualify) OR they'll sponsor a construction firm to construct low-income apartment complexes.
On jobs, no one is actually building any houses due to regulations made by Democrats years ago. You will need permits to "build on this area" which can take decades to do so and increases the housing cost.
So currently democrats are doing nothing about the job situation.
They're still imposing more ridiculous regulations to make house-building impossible.
On society however is very interesting.
Every politicians in California wants everyone to "afford housing"
yet do nothing about it.
They keep complaining about how some people who are qualified aren't using the low-income houses and subsidized housing.
But no one actually understands the lowkey workings of it.
Low-income houses in CA are literal shitholes
Just think of these low-income houses as Detroit where drug usage and gun violence is very dangerous.
And the problem is that these low-income houses wouldn't be a problem if we didn't stack them up next to each other like a neighborhood
But what affluent area would want a low-income house complex in their area?
It would drive them down their property prices!
*wink*
So what is Trump been doing for the dream chasing lower-middle class?
Cutting their taxes, decentralizing grant programs, and curbing regulations.
Exactly what he's been doing.
For people who served in the military, these people are often placed in the lower-middle class already.
They're not poor enough to be lower, but they're not wealthy enough to be middle.
And if they're not careful
They'll end up lower class because of their military conditioning.
So Trump's been trying to stop that.
Trump's also been trying to cut taxes by increasing your kid tax deductions.
1 kid being tax deducted is now worth 2 kids pre-trump tax deducted.
So a lot of poor families will actually see more tax returns than usual.
Despite what the mainstream media gives shit examples like (1 couple of 2 homosexuals will end up paying more because they are upper class???)
Trump's been also empowering the small business owners (middle-upper)
This will be my last segment and the middle-upper are an important class.
They're the one that will basically be the biggest taxpayers
Trustfund babies, retiring white-collar working boomers, stock investors all fall under this category.
Now they're not the biggest taxpayers in term of federal government
nono
these are the biggest tax payers for your state and local government.
They pay city permits, property taxes, and capital gains taxes... much more.
They're also your #1 local lobbyists as well(different from the main lobbyists that lobby for corporate[this can be discussed if @ me])
But they're not exactly large enough to vote
after all 1 (wo)man, 1 vote.
But they're been the biggest to be affected by politics nowadays.
Democrats simply don't want to tax the big companies because they'll just loophole away.
Well, Democrats that aren't of AOC kind that is.
So Democrats try to simply tax the middle-upper class.
Whenever a new program needs to be funded
They tend to tax/regulate these people the most to space
Republicans however try to do the opposite and ensure these small business stay thriving and growing
but that means oh wait corporations get to thrive and grow bigger than ever as well
So if you really want a better American society.
You have to ensure that the gap between the upper class and middle-upper class remain steady and not grow at an insane rate.
Make sure you don't piss off your middle class because they're the one that leans the most radical to either socialists or new rightists(not alt-right).
Make sure you don't disfranchise your lower-middle class or else they'll join their middle class brethrens via government, job, or social policy.
and you babysit the lower class to prevent them from inflicting harm to society.
Now two radical literary novel offers an insight into what a better society could look like radically.
You can either adopt the *1984* concept where the upper class is the ruling party, and the middle-upper, middle, and lower-middle class are all being monitored and babysat very carefully while the lower class get to be careless and become indoctrinated.
OR you can adopt the *Brave New World* concept where the upper class, middle-upper, and middle are formed as one ruling group that distance themselves away(by distinguishing themselves one way or another) from the lower-middle and lower classes who are essentially sedated and oppressed(but a lack of self-awareness prevents them from realizing this)
However if those are two radical for you, we can just continue what we're doing right now with Trump's administration.
Hoping we don't fuck with the lower-middle and middle-upper class too much to flip the spectrum left. After all if the Republicans don't succeed in their efforts, the Democrats will try again and the so the spectrum flipping left to right to whoever remains based and dominant.
Fin.
-warn @Techpriest dont spam
โ Warned `Techpriest#2590`
I agree with this
@Big Smoke ะงัะฝะณัั Was that sent to you?
Some dude sent me this on instagram because i said obama was a bad president
LOL
hes a beta
I said he was a retard for using too much emojiโs
And then called me far behind while he doesnโt make sence!
Lol what a beta
If anyone thinks Obama is a good president they are either illegal, living off welfare, or plain stupid
i did not know mary
was a guy now
Obama wasn't a great president. But I'm uneducated on his actions so defending him would be asinine.
An interesting debate would be to see if you guys believe that the Mueller Report was accurately a complete and total exoneration of Donald Trump and his campaign?
I don't think the Dems will stop (even though they should and it will damage their image more if they carry on with the Russia shit) but I do think Trump is innocent himself
I think you're right in the sense that we have completely stopped pushing towards important programs and law changes for the betterment of the country. However, I also think its important to hold everyone accountable. No matter where they stand politically.
Clinton should be charged for utilizing an unsafe email to conduct government business.
If it were found that Trump directly worked with Russia, then he ought to be charged too.
I just don't understand why it was repeatedly lied about that there was zero connection to Russia when it was found that the campaign met with Russians over 100 times.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/828939235499638784
You say something like this repeatedly to the press and then we find out about Trump Tower Moscow
GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 4!
that tweet made in 2017
trump is the best
What? It doesn't matter. Did he change his mind or sum?
If people actually understood how the Mueller Report was conducted
it would be understandable how true it was
all he did was literally interview everyone in the trump's campaign if they were talking with russia
!ban @YT_MainFrame
@YT_MainFrame did '**Unspecified.**' and got the ban hammer! <:CHECK6:403540120181145611>
@Deleted User donny the clown did the same thing, he refused a safe secure phone, he kept his personal phone, that has the chinese and sow-dees tracking it
@CallMeTruckson Kushner lawyer said that Kushner spoke to a foreign country about nukes... on a private email.
@Deleted User i dont care about kushners personal lawyer,
Yeah well you should when it involves national security
ุฃูุง ุฅุฑูุงุจู
@Deleted User and donnies garbage son gave nukes to the sowdees, they already have satellite pictures
GG @CallMeTruckson, you just advanced to level 1!
Did you know that Osama was a Saudi national too. Idiots blame Iran and Iraq for 9/11 when it was the Saudis.
@CallMeTruckson
@Deleted User yes and the religitard right doesnt seem to care, but hillary is a horrible demon for giving uranium to russia though right?
How is trump so stupid about climate changes
>so stupid
consider these propositions
Our economy will take a 10% downfall
just so we can barely dent mankind's emission to global warming
Besides the Paris Climate Accords has been rigged from the start.
It forces all major emission nations to subsidize for green energy if they do not reduce their own emission
IN OTHER COUNTRIES
China doesn't have this problem
They are forcing green energy on every area
So they don't have to subsidize poor nation's green development
trumps german father would have wanted the green new deal, he would have gotten to its oranges
you're actually slow
Meet the new and programmed NPC
its oranges will be found portee, trumps german father would want it
Imagine only listening to left wing Propaganda
just a quick question, how can you be an atheist republican? they despise atheists
you can be Conservative and Atheist
they do exist
well i guess they take what they can get
falling for the stereotypes again
smh
^
wtf i thought you couldnt have christian democrats?
when all their policies have to do with religion and you claim to be atheist
WTF MUSLIM REPUBLIACNS?
Not really
CNN BTFO
Free market has nothing to do with Religion
You can advocate for a policy
for completely different reason
and free market has nothing to do with republicans
LOL
like you can be pro-life
from religion
or you can say you just don't want to give woman a choice
Yes
completely two distinct things
I'm pro-life and I'm not religious
but religion has no right telling anybody how to live their life
you don't have to believe in a god to be pro-life
Religion does not
im pro choice because its whats right
LOL
okay bud
indeed
People choose to live there lives according to religion
Yes
actually im anti-choice
and anti-life
oh
women dont get to choose and we abort all babies
overpopulation crisis solved
i disagree
im also pro-healthcare
IMO its the womens choice
the REAL pro-healthcare
I believe healthcare should be taking care of the healthy
instead of taking care of the sick
im against free heathcare in america it could never work
The baby has a right to freedom and pursue happiness
Why the fuck is government spending so much money for the sick?
They should be spending money for the healthy
Do sicks work?
They take day-offs
they can spend billions bombing other countries
very based
dont forget socialists stopped the 1000 mia khalifa lookalike from existing in our timeline
if we kept the iranian shah
we would have been living in a timeline where middle eastern porn would be mass-produced
and mass-distributed
jav btfo
in fact we would have 2 powerful ALLIES in the middle east
Israel and Iran
but no muh socialists party has to topple down the shah
and now we get a shithole in Iran and the rest of the middle east
lol we have a shithole in the middle east, wow you would think after constant bombing they would clean up...
We have a shit hole because socialists tried to larp as liberating the government
If we kept the Iranian Shah, Iraq would have been kept in check and Afghanistan wouldn't be a shithole after the USSR failed to invade them.
But instead we disposed of Shah, get the Iranian clergy in power instead of the socialists (ironically because socialists werent popular in the first place)
Then Iranian Clergy starts prosecuting Iraqi to no mercy
Forcing Iraq and Iran in a war
With both side of the US and USSR profitting
Then with USSR attempting ot support socialists in the Afghanistan
Iran and Iraq were both in no situation to help Afghanistan
thats what the world is for tech, meddling to make money for the defense contractors
so the US decides to help Afghanistan
"just focus on the guns"
"we will give u food and water"
and then once the USSR stops invading afghanistan
no more food and water supply lines
and then afghanistan is a shit hole full of guns
if that never happened those PMC companies woulnt be as rich though...
And all started because the Iranian Shah
the most based man in the middle east
had to be disposed off by socialists
If you seen Persia under his rule, women need not apply clothes to all of their body
women were free to express themselves
yes because america is set up like an EA game, pay to win, but in the 100 million dollar variety
women were allowed to drive
but instead the socialists were too greedy
and forced the shah out of his benevolent rule
"muh muh democracy"
and democracy got the iranian clergy elected instead of the socialists
what a surprise
socialism is the worst political system, besides all the others
The monarchy is the best political system
undisputable redpills
๐ค
His private and public interest overlaps
He cannot be rich if his kingdom is not rich
He rules with the sovereignty that he represents all interest of his people.
In a democracy, the politicians are only representing SOME interest of the people.
Democracy Politicians are elected by Charisma and Money.
whereas a monarchy is elected and appointed under the social contract of the governed and govern
That the monarch will do his best to serve the general will
It is also true that the King has no opponents against him and that's a good thing.
Look where America got them in the issue of slavery
It took them 4 years to fight a war losing 5% of their population
to ban slavery
That doesn't sound very good
Whereas the King only wrote a law
outlawing slavery
and slavery was outlawed without losing a single drop of blood
Wouldn't that give the Government more power than it already has?\
If he serves the interest of you better than the politicians of democracy
would that be a bad thing?
Let's consider Trump
188,487 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 45/754
| Next