Smashes their compression a bit too

oh you're just talking about shooting in 4k

not actually outputting in 4k?

Well, the 4K mastered stuff are kinda limited atm

New BDs and specific Netlfix stuff

hardly industry standard

and all that means is that it's the minimim quality reqiorements used for professional work

if you can afford to shoow above 1080 go for your life

all i'm saying is that you dont explicitly need to for a while

wrong channel

The major resolutions are generally only important to cinemas and such

for instance my microphone is industry standard and it gets the job done well but if you want to go above standard to advanced or even higher there's nothing stopping you other than your wallet

I think most people will have a hard time going past 4K for a while

having acess to a computer that can render long 4k videos is another problem

plus storage space

whole list of expenses

All of those are getting better and better, though

And cheaper, too

yes they are

Especially drives

yes they are

I mean, 6TBs for 160 bucks

that doesn't make it better and better and cheaper right now

just means it will be eventually

I don't know how I would define "cheap" nowaday, though

where we are right now it's not totally viable for every person to go start making 4k videos

Due to long periods of Chink shopping

But considering people pay premiums for phones and such

It wouldn't be surprising for them to find stuff like these affordable, if they were to pursue it

People are spending more and the companies are taking advantage of this

i woudn't consider using a phone with 4k for 4k video or anything other than hobbyist level shooting

I wouldn't go for that kind of phone it that really was what I'm going to do with it

I bet people would go for Oukitel style battery life over 4k cameras right now

i would

What's that thing packing?

battery life is the main problem with phones now

even though i have no issues with battery life after getting that Xiaomi bank

6000-10000mAh

Gotta be at least 1440p screen tho

Oh, a variance?

Is the higher capacity one bigger or something?

Oukitel is sweet, played with the 4000 Pro, amazing phone

6000 Pro model is the most recent

and there's the Oukitel K10000

it has worse specs though

they're bringing out a K6000 Premium with 6gb of ram

OOOOH

6gb!

It's funny that they're called "OUKITEL"

Literally means "Big phone" in Japanese

(will it be a 12 core?)

In this case the battery

http://www.gearbest.com/cell-phones/pp_349081.html?wid=21

Well, the price premium isn't that significant

Only 50 bucks more

http://www.androidheadlines.com/2016/04/oukitel-k6000-premium-to-sport-6gb-of-ram-6000mah-battery.html

I think the K10000 is butt ugly

compared to the K6000

looks like a Michael Bay Transformer cummed it out

comfy

http://cdn.gsmarena.com/imgroot/news/15/12/oukitel-k10000-pre-order/-728xw3/gsmarena_002.jpg

that chink phone worth ?

kek, what's up with that logo

is that a seflie light built in at the top?

worth what?

I bet I can commit murder Agent 47 style pretty effectively with it

lol

the K4000 Pro is heavy as fuck

but it feels a good heavy

kek

I want

like it won't slip out of your hands like pixie dust

This phone can charge other phones

If only screen was 1440p

yeah the k10000 can charge an iphone 3 times before dying

it's a phone stalin

I need dat ppi tho

i'm sure you do

I'd buy this phone just for the kill potential

And armament factor

Gotta read the tiny terminal text in irc tho.

I could probably power a stun gun and taze someone

And read two pages of a book at once

And once it's out of juice, I'd use the phone as a fist weapon

reading irc on a phone instead of on your powerglove

there's chink stress tests for it

using the oukitel to put together a table

as the hammer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjDSOZy0ox8

is there one attached to a wrecking ball machine where they use the oukitel to bring down a house?

1080p is just not good enough for the amount of reading I do

i dont believe you but whatever this is /g/

i already see teh pixels on my g3 which has 1440p

Stalin has 20 monitors

he needs those pixels

gotta lift those cables off the floor so i can hear my music better

Cannot unsee pixels

holy shit ..... that one is more stronger than CAT new prototype ?

I got some computer parts today

what's wrong with seeing pixels?

I know the K4000 Pro could bludgeon someone so definitely strong

feels THICC

in your hand

i can't see the pixels on my m9

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq39ybJQrOs

1Its harder to read tiny af text when you see the pixels

resolution on this phone is 1080 and 441ppi

can't see the pixels

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z4w5P3Vsrs

My phone is like 1cm away from my face while reading tho

>using your phone to read things

that's how you get short sighted

have fun

so this is student life in 2016

G3 is only 538ppi

@comfy lol. I only use my phone to read fantasy and sci fi

and irc if i remeber you saying correctly

Gotta escape reality somehow

>reading fiction on your phone

get an Ecig to

and an E-mail

Ereader pixels tho

instead of putting your phone 1cm from your face

you can't see them if you hold it further from your face

Like 210ppi

well im still rocking @Deleted User with my nexus 5

the new kindle has high dpi

but $$$$

this is an issue you're creating for yourself

The new kindle is the 200ppi one

I thought the kindle keyboard was good enough and still do

that tech matured to completion the second it was born

Also If I take my glasses off (required to save eyesight while reading) O can only see 3" in front of my face

oasis is 300dpi

god this is the equivalent of someone talking about lightbulbs in lumens and total lux per room

ppi*

which is p high for some text

Dae 140w bulbs tho

here we go

no one is going to buy a kindle oasis

except extreme end richfags

how sharp does text on a screen need to be

amazon needs to stick to poorfag tech

like their tablets

>mfw i keep my room optimised between 25 - 50 lux

Fr tho the last phone I had before this was an original iphone 4 and it was fine

all that presious lumens

P I S S

Lol

>above 50 is literal cancer kys

I bought it right after It came out when I first begrudgingly got a smartphone

>his lumens is above 320
>I bet he he uses halogen
>Thinking he's going to get laid with that many lumens

he's a student with ten thousand monitors

of course he's getting laid

>Still using edison screw

what else is there to do in college, study?

@ark just use my gasmask as a cieling light

>buckwheatclark in the voice chat

oh shit green flashes

he's left his mic on again

>Gasmask
It's like you want uneven spread of light in your light per meter

he does that every day

:^)

what happens when you graduate and can't run up a $10000 electricity bill?

selling it all?

he was havihg an aurgument with his friend about ammunition

@buckwheatclark you have to work on labour day?

Lol, get an apartment where electricity is included :^)

trigger him by saying medium rounds are easily the most efficient rounds

remember when Buck was on the podcast and people were in the thread saying he knows nothing about guns? Made me sad for him

45acp all the way nigga

@buckwheatclark Hey dude you left your mic on

they did use the term "medium sized ammunition"

I think he turns his monitor off

or walks away

he rarely responds

Gotta use thos 1" rounds

haha really

once in a while he comes to the chat to settle an argument

but mostly it's him arguing with his parents

yeah

doesn't respond to @

he probably uses above 50 lux

damn okay

>never had a prolonged period of being single to go full autist about lighting and ppi

no one on g goes autist about lightbulbs

I got one of those chink lightbulbs

it's ugly as fuck

hey what's up

sup

you left your mic on

forever

i always forget

btw medium sized rounds with proper grain are far more efficiant at killing people than larger rounds with less gunpowder

they don't teach muricans in the south proper mic control

too busy teaching them that gays are the devil

efficent as in cost effective or how often it hits?

efficient as in it kills better

really .223 or 5.45 from the militaries of usa and russia

are about right

we're judging by maximum death per bullet

has anybody lined up some liberals to test this?

we know that liberals have softer, more spongey flesh than conservatives

might throw off the data a bit

at closer ranges lighter grains fly straighter and get better groups generally

and most militaries assume that their conflicts will be in close proximity

but that's silly imo

at what lux are these results tested in and at what ppi are you reading this info?

i just look at history of bullets

if i remeber correctly

because it could be misinformation below a certain lux

the .223 came from the .222

but how good are they at killing

@buckwheatclark how many liberals has your dad got buried in the back garden?

none 'yet'

are we talking at a ratio of 1 - 2 or lower

macmanera

or however you spell his name

came out with statistics

i know medium bullets kill at a minimum of 1.32 dead people per bullet squared

lol

that's silly

buck

yeah?

are your family still voting for trump?

yeah

dad thinks trump is controlled opposition though

but a .223 will kill a person

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSE-XoVKaXg

it's not silly when you think about the populatoin of china, if you put them shoulder to shoulder, you'd be able to shoot and kill far more chineese people on average than any other humans densley packed together with medium sized rounds

@buckwheatclark Your dad might be right

but 1 .223 bullet is usually between 40-60 grains

.30-06 which is what we were talking about

starts at 120 grains

normal is 150 grains

how many grains in a clip though?

8 for m1 garand

so 8 x 150

yeah but the muzzle velocity of the bullet doesn't matter if you have 10 Square meters of people to shoot at

we need the nips to get back into imperialism

they did valuable killing chinks research

yeah it does

how many they can behead in a half an hour etc

what if they're 2000 yards away?

i said point blank earlier

oh

where are you getting 2000 yards from

in a magazine of .223

in a magazine of medium bullets